BAD430BENZ

what exactly does the CLK have done to it ?

....and i know it's not just a tune

jacob502

Wow Mr. Sherlock is really cracking it

but I'll answer your pathetic question. The CLK is completely NA with these mods:

- PP-Performance ECU tune
- Caragrahic headers+ exhust
- Sport filters with Euro airboxes

Ask Andy, he has all the photos :-)

Anymore questions?

ecampbell

Jacob with all due respect you are getting quite insulting to members. I didn't know what was done to th clk either.

dodger63

Please don't say i asked for a video because I did not

jacob502

believe me, not my intention. I just dont like claims and lies being put on me. Like me giving Jimmy software files from other tuners. I am not that kind of person nor do I work for PP-Performance.

dodger63

Wow remeber when I killed the UGR lambo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRqa...e_gdata_player

Sirex63

With all my respect to you dodger read my post again.

I just quoted your comment to reply to whom asked for the video and you can see that i wrote YOU GUYS instead if YOU DODGER.

dodger63

I hope it all works out for you

Sirex63

Actually the member that Jacob is talking about replied to this thread and I don't think that anybody recognized him. He's a really a good friend of mine and I dont want to lose his friendship when i post the video I taped. I know he will get mad.

If it's okay with him, I would really appreciate if shows himself and give me the permission infront of everyone to post it.

jacob502

looooooool. well the "UGR" lambo wasnt runing with the same M156 engine and didnt switch to to MHP

Zod

I think he was trying to say that his car is fast! , which it is

but then again his car is not your typical Ecu tune and LT 63...I would wager a guess and say not by a long shot

dodger63 do you daily drive your car by any chance?

dodger63

You totally missed the point of the post I'm not trying to say my car is fast, what's you definition of daily drive and what does that matter in this thread and no it isn't a typical lth tune car??

Zod

Am sorry i missed the point, but you posted the vid not me...fact of the matter is i still don't get it
Did not mean to upset you

As for the definition, why its elementary my dear dodger it so happens to lie within the 2 words

Daily: as in within a day to day basis routine (example going to work, picking up kids, shopping, going out, racing.. etc)
Driver: to drive it within the parameters of Daily

dodger63

Def not upset. I drive a pickup daily, but I do those. Activities in the c so Idk

c32AMG-DTM

Your name-calling is insulting, as I'm sure you intended. Have I wronged you somehow?

To clarify, I am not a "mouthpiece" or spokesman for Andy/MHP, and was not "chosen" by anyone other than myself to offer my comments in post #121. Hell, I haven't conversed with Andy at all recently, and maybe a handful of times in the past year or so. I think the last one was sending him a quick congratulatory note once they got cam software working in Keith's car and the dynos were publicized, whenever that was.

Ironic that the qualities you despise in Andy are apparently qualities that you both share. Congratulations.

hhughes1

This has been a very interesting and entertaining conversation as usual. I am actually impressed with what appears to be a slightly heightened degree of civility between the members with opposing views, maybe we are making progress.

Let me start out by saying that if I was in a position to put a blower on my 63, it would definitely be a Weistec unit along with their tune. While I am completely happy with the MHP performance adders that I have had for quite some time, I would at least start with the tune that is supplied with the sc as a baseline to ensure the forced induction conversion was accomplished without incident. Down the road, who knows? I have also met Andy’s current tuner, watched him tweak Keith’s car for NO2 an entire afternoon and he knows what he is doing. My high octane tune is incredible.

But the OP chose a different route and from what I understand is now unhappy with both of the tuners that he gave access to his car.

MHP because the car did not make sc power (above 6,000 rpm specifically the power actually falls off????)

PP-Performance because the car now runs only in limp mode???????

Just an observation, but has anyone ever seen two dyno runs where the power differential is only above 6,000 rpm? Identical power through the entire graph until that point would seem to indicate either a serious and obvious glitch in the software which was not sent back to MHP for evaluation, OR a mechanical problem, most likely a consumption issue relative to fuel and air at maximum ingestion aka above 6,000 rpm. Either way the op chose a vendor who is remotely located to him and once the problem was identified he allowed another tuner to rewrite the ecu the same day!!!!!! Personally if I were Steve or Andy, I would wipe my hands clean of this customer and let him fend for himself with the tuner he most recently chose rather than follow due course for resolution.

hhughes1

Edit, scratch the part above regarding civility, it appears things are heading down the familiar path.

BAD430BENZ

thank you Watson....like i said before , i have nothing invested in MHP so i couldn't care less if a car wins or loses . i just like to see the outcome of races . from all your previous posts , you kept preaching about it being a tune only car . this is why i asked the question after seeing the video . i didn't know what the car actually had

i appreciate you answering my "pathetic" question

BAD430BENZ

don't blame him...it's my fault for being Mr. Sherlock and asking "pathetic" questions

propain

Were good, I have no issue with you. I am just surprised to see you posting bad about MHP. From our previous discussions you stated how untouchable they were and how I should hope to never have to line up with one wit my OE Tune.