C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: 2013 SL63 AMG or 2013 C63 AMG Black Series
2013 Mercedes Benz SL63 AMG
39
52.70%
2013 C63 AMG Black Series
35
47.30%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll

2013 C63 AMG Black Series or 2013 SL63 AMG?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-25-2012, 01:48 PM
  #26  
Zod
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 2,597
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
C63 blk is very cool...but if u already have an SLS its kind of pointless having both
unless you can have a third later on
Old 05-25-2012, 02:56 PM
  #27  
Banned
 
Guilty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,838
Received 69 Likes on 58 Posts
'16 C63-S
Lol post this on the W204 forum and everyone will say go for the CBS, post this on the SL forum and everyone is gonna say go for the SL.
Old 05-25-2012, 04:18 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
_AMG_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63
Biturbo SL63 gets my vote.
Old 05-25-2012, 06:37 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
-=Hot|Ice=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 1,390
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Cars.
SL63 AMG. I saw the new SL on the road today and my god does it turn heads.
Old 05-25-2012, 06:51 PM
  #30  
Super Member
 
Pickles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
(a)'12 C63 P/P, LSD, 19" m/spoke,comfort pack. (b)Astra SRI.
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by natman316
how about an sl65?
Yes, what a way to go....he could even look for a B.S?
Cheers, Pickles.
Old 05-25-2012, 08:03 PM
  #31  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SLS Qatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
I think I have made up my mind. I gave the C63 AMG BS order to my cousin since I have an SLS and I think there is no point of going to another M156 engine. The SLS is faster and has better performance and handling.

So I think it is time to switch to luxury and MASSIVE TORQUE


Thank you all for voting and sharing your inputs
Old 05-25-2012, 08:10 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
I think I have made up my mind. I gave the C63 AMG BS order to my cousin since I have an SLS and I think there is no point of going to another M156 engine. The SLS is faster and has better performance and handling.

So I think it is time to switch to luxury and MASSIVE TORQUE


Thank you all for voting and sharing your inputs
S65?
Old 05-25-2012, 08:19 PM
  #33  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SLS Qatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
Originally Posted by propain
S65?

no, not really. It's a whale It's not even a sports car. It is not for me.

I'm looking for combination of sport and luxury. The 2013 SL63 would be best I think.
Old 05-25-2012, 08:46 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
GuppyC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C63, CLS550, CLK BS, Sprinter Passenger Van, Odyssey
Originally Posted by Fung63
had a thought. Guy here is wealthy.

why not both?
Old 05-26-2012, 12:41 AM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
natman316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2012 C63 2015 C300 sport
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
no, not really. It's a whale It's not even a sports car. It is not for me.

I'm looking for combination of sport and luxury. The 2013 SL63 would be best I think.
I ask my previous question. Any particular reason you don't want an SL65? Just wondering
Old 05-26-2012, 09:49 AM
  #36  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SLS Qatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
Originally Posted by natman316
I ask my previous question. Any particular reason you don't want an SL65? Just wondering
sure I could answer that.

I think the 63 is just powerful enough and there is no need to go further since I will get my SLS supercharged in the future and have a powerful lightweight car which will be even faster than the new SL65 even if modded.
Old 05-26-2012, 12:22 PM
  #37  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
natman316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2012 C63 2015 C300 sport
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
sure I could answer that.

I think the 63 is just powerful enough and there is no need to go further since I will get my SLS supercharged in the future and have a powerful lightweight car which will be even faster than the new SL65 even if modded.
ahh true...but then the SL65 does have a more luxurious interior
Old 05-26-2012, 04:35 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
justthebest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'09 SL Black, '12 ML63, '13 SL63, '14 E63 Wagon, '14 458 Italia
SL63 FTW.
Old 05-27-2012, 01:30 AM
  #39  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SLS Qatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
Originally Posted by natman316
ahh true...but then the SL65 does have a more luxurious interior
I believe both have the same interior options, as far as I know
Old 05-27-2012, 01:52 AM
  #40  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
justthebest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
'09 SL Black, '12 ML63, '13 SL63, '14 E63 Wagon, '14 458 Italia
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
I believe both have the same interior options, as far as I know
I'm pretty sure it takes some significant Designo additions to the 63 to match the 65.
Old 05-27-2012, 08:53 AM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
no, not really. It's a whale It's not even a sports car. It is not for me.

I'm looking for combination of sport and luxury. The 2013 SL63 would be best I think.
You said luxury and big torque. You would be hard pressed to find the S65's equal in this department.

Its not whale... its a 747 in the first class section! Not every car has to be a sports car. Its the best $210K you will ever spend.

Stock with 4 people in the car.... Now TUNE it....

Old 05-27-2012, 09:23 AM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
rory breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NA
Posts: 1,675
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Yes
What an ahole...waves bye bye to the four door luxury sedan with four people in it getting their glutes massaged while he's in his murci barely walking them.

Ps this is a no brainer, get the sl63.
Old 05-29-2012, 02:41 AM
  #43  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
SLS Qatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 SLS AMG, 2009 SL63 AMG, 2008 C63 AMG(SOLD)
Originally Posted by propain
You said luxury and big torque. You would be hard pressed to find the S65's equal in this department.

Its not whale... its a 747 in the first class section! Not every car has to be a sports car. Its the best $210K you will ever spend.

Stock with 4 people in the car.... Now TUNE it....
I prefer a real 2 door sport car. The S65 is not for me.
I raced a tuned 2010 S65 with modded exhasut with my bro's 2009 SL63, when it had tune and primary cat delete only. The SL63 was ahead. So with the new 5.5TT V8 2013 SL63 it will be completely different especially when it is tuned. I might get it tuned only as I wouldn't really car about racing with it that much.
If anyone messes with me I can just pull out the SLS when it is supercharged and give them a lesson

BTW that Murcielago is of year 2005 so it's not a surprise . Anyway Lambos and Ferraris in my opinion are over rated in terms of power and performance. I don't even buy magazines' claims.
Old 05-29-2012, 02:58 AM
  #44  
Super Member
 
balthaser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 512
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2009 C63 AMG
2013 SL63/65 is just too dang sexy to miss. Go for it.



Old 05-29-2012, 04:46 AM
  #45  
Junior Member
 
pushemekuratz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 70
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
c63
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
I prefer a real 2 door sport car. The S65 is not for me.
I raced a tuned 2010 S65 with modded exhasut with my bro's 2009 SL63, when it had tune and primary cat delete only. The SL63 was ahead. So with the new 5.5TT V8 2013 SL63 it will be completely different especially when it is tuned. I might get it tuned only as I wouldn't really car about racing with it that much.
If anyone messes with me I can just pull out the SLS when it is supercharged and give them a lesson

BTW that Murcielago is of year 2005 so it's not a surprise . Anyway Lambos and Ferraris in my opinion are over rated in terms of power and performance. I don't even buy magazines' claims.
+1
Ferrari wont even let you review one of their cars without them making some serious changes to the test car. With that being said get the SL63!
Old 05-29-2012, 07:42 AM
  #46  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
natman316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
2012 C63 2015 C300 sport
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
I believe both have the same interior options, as far as I know
I dont know about in Qatar but in the US, at least on CL and S class, the 65 interior is nicer. better diamond leather and less plastics .
Old 05-29-2012, 09:26 AM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by SLS Qatar
I raced a tuned 2010 S65 with modded exhasut with my bro's 2009 SL63, when it had tune and primary cat delete only. The SL63 was ahead.
You beat a 575/780 rw S65 with what? SL63 tuned plus cat delete... 450 rw? I understand there is an 800lb difference between the two but the S65 has almost 400 more lb-ft torque to deal with that.

Im callin BS.
Old 05-29-2012, 10:26 AM
  #48  
Zod
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Zod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 2,597
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
Originally Posted by propain
You beat a 575/780 rw S65 with what? SL63 tuned plus cat delete... 450 rw? I understand there is an 800lb difference between the two but the S65 has almost 400 more lb-ft torque to deal with that.

Im callin BS.
I have to agree to a degree here
why.. well because i have seen the NA 63 SL and well it is not a step up from a 55k SL and on top of that i have seen the 65 in all its tune formats.Lets put it this way...its a monster I am talking 530whp minimum...
tuned you looking anything from 550-600+whp
Lets not even mention the torque

This includes multiple races, not just referencing to dynos
Old 05-29-2012, 10:29 AM
  #49  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
Cylinder Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 6,729
Received 560 Likes on 370 Posts
'19 E63S, ‘16 CLS63 RIP, '09 E63 Gone, '06 M5 Gone, '97 Supra TT Gone
Originally Posted by pushemekuratz
+1
Ferrari wont even let you review one of their cars without them making some serious changes to the test car. With that being said get the SL63!
This is unfortunately very true and has forever soured me on Ferraris.

SL63 or bust, you're nuts if you choose the C!
Old 05-29-2012, 10:36 AM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
propain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
See Sig
Originally Posted by Zod
I have to agree to a degree here
why.. well because i have seen the NA 63 SL and well it is not a step up from a 55k SL and on top of that i have seen the 65 in all its tune formats.Lets put it this way...its a monster I am talking 530whp minimum...
tuned you looking anything from 550-600+whp
Lets not even mention the torque

This includes multiple races, not just referencing to dynos



S65 runs 11-11.3 @129 on drags tune only. With exhaust work much better.

Stock for stock on a roll on the S65 would MURDER a tune only SL63. The S65 stock walks a M5 on a roll on by about 20 cars.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2013 C63 AMG Black Series or 2013 SL63 AMG?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 PM.