





2013 C63 AMG Black Series or 2013 SL63 AMG?
So I think it is time to switch to luxury and MASSIVE TORQUE

Thank you all for voting and sharing your inputs
So I think it is time to switch to luxury and MASSIVE TORQUE

Thank you all for voting and sharing your inputs

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I think the 63 is just powerful enough and there is no need to go further since I will get my SLS supercharged in the future and have a powerful lightweight car which will be even faster than the new SL65 even if modded.
Its not whale... its a 747 in the first class section! Not every car has to be a sports car. Its the best $210K you will ever spend.

Stock with 4 people in the car.... Now TUNE it....
Ps this is a no brainer, get the sl63.
Its not whale... its a 747 in the first class section! Not every car has to be a sports car. Its the best $210K you will ever spend.

Stock with 4 people in the car.... Now TUNE it....
I raced a tuned 2010 S65 with modded exhasut with my bro's 2009 SL63, when it had tune and primary cat delete only. The SL63 was ahead. So with the new 5.5TT V8 2013 SL63 it will be completely different especially when it is tuned. I might get it tuned only as I wouldn't really car about racing with it that much.
If anyone messes with me I can just pull out the SLS when it is supercharged and give them a lesson

BTW that Murcielago is of year 2005 so it's not a surprise
. Anyway Lambos and Ferraris in my opinion are over rated in terms of power and performance. I don't even buy magazines' claims.
I raced a tuned 2010 S65 with modded exhasut with my bro's 2009 SL63, when it had tune and primary cat delete only. The SL63 was ahead. So with the new 5.5TT V8 2013 SL63 it will be completely different especially when it is tuned. I might get it tuned only as I wouldn't really car about racing with it that much.
If anyone messes with me I can just pull out the SLS when it is supercharged and give them a lesson

BTW that Murcielago is of year 2005 so it's not a surprise
. Anyway Lambos and Ferraris in my opinion are over rated in terms of power and performance. I don't even buy magazines' claims.Ferrari wont even let you review one of their cars without them making some serious changes to the test car. With that being said get the SL63!
Im callin BS.
why.. well because i have seen the NA 63 SL and well it is not a step up from a 55k SL and on top of that i have seen the 65 in all its tune formats.Lets put it this way...its a monster I am talking 530whp minimum...
tuned you looking anything from 550-600+whp
Lets not even mention the torque

This includes multiple races, not just referencing to dynos
why.. well because i have seen the NA 63 SL and well it is not a step up from a 55k SL and on top of that i have seen the 65 in all its tune formats.Lets put it this way...its a monster I am talking 530whp minimum...
tuned you looking anything from 550-600+whp
Lets not even mention the torque

This includes multiple races, not just referencing to dynos

S65 runs 11-11.3 @129 on drags tune only. With exhaust work much better.
Stock for stock on a roll on the S65 would MURDER a tune only SL63. The S65 stock walks a M5 on a roll on by about 20 cars.







