M177 Engine
#26
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
'09 C63
What I would really like to see in the new AMG C-class is moderate to heavy use of carbon fiber construction; not just the bits (diffuser, spoiler, lip, etc.) but body and chassis. I'm sure they can justify the pricing with carbon fiber, since it's prevalent in the market already. Wouldn't cost too much to produce.
#27
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
'09 C63
![smash](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smashfreak.gif)
#28
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: On a oil lease cracking rock to recover glorious sour oil
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Modded 2010 Harley Edition F-450 and a '13 S5
A turbo will make more power than a S/C any day of the week. Just consider the parasitic power loss alone.
Anyone that would have a s/c car over a turbo charged car has never been in a turbo'd car that has proper turbo sizing.
Anyone that would have a s/c car over a turbo charged car has never been in a turbo'd car that has proper turbo sizing.
#29
MBWorld Fanatic!
6.2L vs 4.0L thats quite a bit of displacement loss as well. The new motor definately wont suck down gas like the current model probably close to 30mpg highway 20mpg city vs 15-22mpg on the 63 lol. The 5.5L turbo's dont really have any lag but still dont compare to a blown 63's torque in the idle-2krpm range. they also dont pull as hard as a 63 in the top end 5k+ but its not exactly fair to compare a factory tt 5.5L direct injected to 6.2L aftermarket tuned and supercharged. muchless something 1.5L smaller. Theres alot of differences to compare the two. ultimately usually turbo motors are built much stronger and detuned heavily tuned in stock form. Im all for turbos but for a daily driver where your in lower rpm blowers do the job better for instant go.