C63 or M4?
Personally and based on experiences with mechanics where I work, BMW is a lower quality product than Mercedes, they have so many problems, is amazing, 7 series are the worst cars made, only last (barely) 30/40K without a problem, everytime we get some they need new tranny.
3 series are good, and M3 if you race is better, but overall I'd choose the C63 all day.
And as I've said before, would you really want to deal with all the growing pains associated with getting a car during the first model year? Rarely does that turn out well.
Not really, first year of new model, if it is a total redesign, specially talking about BMW, can/may be a total disaster (hopefully it won't), they don't test it enough, they don't have enough information, and they will tweak/fix the problems to second year...Their cars drive great, but are far from being reliable.
You can think however you want, but first depending on certain manufacturers usually have more problems, and i BET BMW is one of them, I know many BMW CM and they always tell that.
You can think however you want, but first depending on certain manufacturers usually have more problems, and i BET BMW is one of them, I know many BMW CM and they always tell that.

Also one thing to keep in mind is that BMW has full maintenance for 4 years covered (at least in Canada, and MB doesn't). I never paid a cent in a BMW dealer, even for the rental car etc. Which makes the first year issues a little less painful
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
BMWs really need investment after 60-70K, and by that time your "included" maintenance is gone.
BMW has to nail the new M3/M4 or their long standing performance cred is in trouble IMO... I'm sure they'll sell a ton of them either way but doesn't mean it will be a better car than the E9x. The rumblings on M3post for years has been that the letter M now stands for Marketing vs Motorsport... especially with things like the X5M/X6M.
Also, to quote Car & Driver ... "WHY IT MATTERS: Stepping into the Sasquatch-sized shoes of the M3 coupe, the M4 needs to repair the M division's heavily dinged reputation. "

PL
Then tell anyone with an M4 to come close to you.. Yeah you might not be fast in the corners.. but you'll be that far ahead of him that you can take your corners as slow as you want before he even gets to them.
Nothing will come close to you..
The quality of a C63 sh*ts on bmw and their generic interiors.. Every single class from 3 series up has the same interior.
Get a C63 from 08-13, don't touch the new Twin Turbo sh*t.
507, P31.. all the same **** meh.. a tune and some mods will have you blowing the doors of most of these cars.
Necessary Evils: LSD, Tune, Suspension.
Luxuries
Kleeman or Weistec Blower, headers etc
Previous BMW was an '08 335i -- that coupe was a better compromise between performance and comfort than the c63 coupe. I was also part of that mess with the HPFP and wastegate issues that the original 3.0TT engine had, so from experience, if I were interested in the new m4 (which I'm not), I would wait and see how the new engine plays out...
V12TT a superb engine and car's super comfy, but after test driving C63 recently(among others), i ended up getting 07 E63 and really enjoying the smaller/sporty chassis for daily driver. planning to sell the S600 now.
PL
Honestly, anybody who buys a M or AMG car is looking for straight performance. Even though BMW tried to accomplish better fuel economy, this still shouldn't be the reason to put a series car engine in an M car and just tune it to 420HP. The smart car enthusiast, would buy a 335i with the M package, and tune it to M4 standards. You will save money and have an M car.
Enjoy
Last edited by w204_Generic; Apr 25, 2014 at 11:22 AM.





