Need a larger hard drive
If i'm not mistaken (it's been ~2 years) this is the guy I bought mine from. Had no problems.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEW-Genuine-Original-PCMCIA-TO-SD-PC-CARD-ADAPTER-Supoort-SDHC-for-Mercedes-Benz-/251450828237?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3a8ba325cd
You can't put anything on the hard drive that isn't ripped into full CD format. So each song then goes from the 5-10MB mp3 to ~40-60MB wav.
There are options to go from PCMCIA -> CF Flash, but i personally chose SDHC. Personal preference the adapters are 17-$30 then its just a matter what kind of card reader/cameras you have around the house.
The initial load time for me & my 4 foldered 3000 song collection was about 30 seconds. By the time I got down the driveway & just to the stop sign it would be working.
Of course occasionally (once per 3-4 months) it would need reseating, but that was about the frequency I would want to add new songs anyway.
HTH
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
pfft, Childs play :P
I have a 15 drive array with 2TB drives, 4 128GB SSD's for cache and log (ZFS) dropped into a quad quad_core E5 series Xeon server with 192GB of ram.. fear my VMWare server
And funny thing is.. not a single movie or song on it... I am sad :PAlso, the weight on that server is like 150 pounds lol, carrier/server grade chassis in a rack.. hell the CPU heat sinks are like 5 pounds each.
I have a 15 drive array with 2TB drives, 4 128GB SSD's for cache and log (ZFS) dropped into a quad quad_core E5 series Xeon server with 192GB of ram.. fear my VMWare server
And funny thing is.. not a single movie or song on it... I am sad :PAlso, the weight on that server is like 150 pounds lol, carrier/server grade chassis in a rack.. hell the CPU heat sinks are like 5 pounds each.

I have a 15 drive array with 2TB drives, 4 128GB SSD's for cache and log (ZFS) dropped into a quad quad_core E5 series Xeon server with 192GB of ram.. fear my VMWare server
And funny thing is.. not a single movie or song on it... I am sad :PAlso, the weight on that server is like 150 pounds lol, carrier/server grade chassis in a rack.. hell the CPU heat sinks are like 5 pounds each.
It is not mission critical data, I would not worry about it. ZFS is just nice and scales well, and is not reliant on hardware. you can in theory remove all the drives, put them in a new machine in a different order, on different controllers, and your arrays and by extension files will remain intact
It is not mission critical data, I would not worry about it. ZFS is just nice and scales well, and is not reliant on hardware. you can in theory remove all the drives, put them in a new machine in a different order, on different controllers, and your arrays and by extension files will remain intact

Also, note that the comand system was built way back in the day when XP was the dominant kiost type software (there was not Windows 7, or even Vista for Kiost/ATM type devices) XP fro embedded devices has always been 32bit, since most embedded devices use 32bit hardware.
This is a hard limit, and in most cases, updates and patches cannot fix that (although for regular xp, you could use exFAT, or if you installed NTFS drivers, which are a pain in the *** and were never meant for XP), then you can increase the sie
Also, note that the comand system was built way back in the day when XP was the dominant kiost type software (there was not Windows 7, or even Vista for Kiost/ATM type devices) XP fro embedded devices has always been 32bit, since most embedded devices use 32bit hardware.
This is a hard limit, and in most cases, updates and patches cannot fix that (although for regular xp, you could use exFAT, or if you installed NTFS drivers, which are a pain in the *** and were never meant for XP), then you can increase the sie
computer nerd

BTW Is that english?
That looks to me, like some of the stuff I post does to others
Last edited by Ingenieur; Oct 20, 2014 at 04:38 PM.






