C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015

2014 507 Tire Size Question - Again... Gurus Please Help!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-23-2014, 04:18 PM
  #26  
Super Member
 
johnny--2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 ATS-V
For reference, here are the 275 Michelin PSS on the stock 18's, no spacers, stock suspension, no performance package.

Filled up some of the wheel gap quite nicely versus the stock 255's, which is the last picture for comparison.

2014 507 Tire Size Question - Again... Gurus Please Help!-imag2382_1_zpsjhgn2mnf.jpg

2014 507 Tire Size Question - Again... Gurus Please Help!-imag2384_1_zpsajs7zimx.jpg

2014 507 Tire Size Question - Again... Gurus Please Help!-imag2385_1_zpskijwmjy4.jpg

2014 507 Tire Size Question - Again... Gurus Please Help!-hdr5_zpsad3e17be.jpg
Old 12-23-2014, 09:37 PM
  #27  
Super Member

 
Thrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 975
Received 50 Likes on 39 Posts
2014 C63 AMG 507 sedan
Originally Posted by johnny--2k
For reference, here are the 275 Michelin PSS on the stock 18's, no spacers, stock suspension, no performance package.

Filled up some of the wheel gap quite nicely versus the stock 255's, which is the last picture for comparison.
What did you do with the front? Spacers or wide tire too?
Old 12-24-2014, 01:00 PM
  #28  
Super Member
 
johnny--2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2016 ATS-V
nothing, fronts are still the stock 235's. They have not required replacement yet, so I'm just running them until it's time to replace them, then I will go with the 245 like everyone else.
Old 12-30-2014, 02:40 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
HBC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,075
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
'18 C63A Cabriolet


The 275-30-19 tires on my stock 507 wheels 19 x 9.
Old 12-30-2014, 09:18 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
WESLEY KAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 C63 AMG 507
Looks great! I'll be going 275 in the rears as well but with Michelin PSSs
Old 12-31-2014, 12:44 PM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
 
HBC350's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,075
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
'18 C63A Cabriolet
Originally Posted by WESLEY KAY
Looks great! I'll be going 275 in the rears as well but with Michelin PSSs


I got a set of Sumitomo HTR ZIII's for $730 out the door from my local tire guy. 245-35-19 and 275-30-19. If I get 10K out of them I will be satisfied. They're quiet and so far adequate.
Old 12-31-2014, 12:50 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
WESLEY KAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 C63 AMG 507
Originally Posted by HBC350
I got a set of Sumitomo HTR ZIII's for $730 out the door from my local tire guy. 245-35-19 and 275-30-19. If I get 10K out of them I will be satisfied. They're quiet and so far adequate.
Hmm....Ill have to take a look at those. I am now leaning towards the Nitto NT05s front and rear...well at least rear. They won't last long......I'm all over the place right now. Also looking at the Vred Vorti's.... 245/275 combo still
Old 12-31-2014, 07:11 PM
  #33  
Super Member
 
JRHolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Las Colinas (Irving, Texas)
Posts: 542
Received 51 Likes on 36 Posts
2024 GLE 63 S AMG SUV
I am going to go with the 245/275 setup as well when the OEM tires wear out

I have never had very good experience with "Value Priced Tires". I know you can save some money but personally I feel that the trade off in ride comfort, noise and wet & dry traction are not worth it to me. If I was driving a Honda civic I am sure it would be fine but not on a performance car.
Old 12-31-2014, 10:32 PM
  #34  
SPONSOR
 
K-Mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,451
Received 145 Likes on 115 Posts
Mercedes-Benz CLK 550
Originally Posted by JRHolt
I am going to go with the 245/275 setup as well when the OEM tires wear out

To further improve tire life it is worth noting:


Since the mid ‘90 model’s, with the ever increasing speed of vehicle assembly lines there has been no front or rear Camber (or front Caster) adjustment facility fitted OEM


Only current adjustment is front and rear Toe and situations where there is insufficient rear Toe once the issue of lack of Camber is overcome!

To attempt to return vehicle to factory specs to resolve costly premature inner edge tire wear, improve traction and fix steering pull the only current alternative for front Camber and Caster is to fit offset, slotted bolts (for the front only). But these are inaccurate - one only position bolts - offering a minimal .3 of one degree adjustment (3mm / 1/8”).

It’s no wonder many owners continually change tire brands or go from one MB Dealer or alignment shop to another trying to get it right/fix the problem!



We saw the need therefore "to fix it right the first time" by designing, developing, patenting (and re-instating from the 1990's) fully adjustable front (and rear) suspension for virtually all models.

The current K-MAC kits have up to 4 times the adjustment of these one only position offset bolts (both Positive or Negative). And unlike these one position bolts that require labour intensive jacking and disassembly each time, the K-MAC kits only require use of a single wrench to accurately adjust on car(under load) direct on alignment turntable (no need for labor intensive removal/replacement each time).



Providing ongoing full, precise adjustment of both Camber and Caster settings if altering suspension height, fitting wide profile tires/wheels, curb knock damage or being able to quickly fine tune/change specs on race days (extra Negative/plus track width to go deeper into the corners/lower lap times). With the unique K-MAC patented design only requiring use of a single wrench/no disassembly.

For the rear, similar kits for precise Camber adjustment (with also additional Toe to compensate for the new Camber facility). Importantly unlike the alternative rear upper adjustable Camber control arms available K-MAC kits do not move top of tire outwards - this reducing essential clearance top of tire to outer fender when adjusting to fix premature inner edge tire wear/improve rear traction.



Also instead of spherical bearings as used on many of these upper control arms which prematurely pound out allowing metal to metal contact. At K-MAC we have developed long life elastomer bushings.


Bonus with all the four front and four rear K-MAC bushes is that they are also designed with twice the load bearing area and replace the highest wearing suspension bushings. And with K-MAC no special tools are required to fit.


Note (Product background re bushings): Majority OEM bushes have air voids to allow 2 axis movement. So control arms can travel through their required arcs without binding, locking up.


Essential with today’s modern designs of “multi-link” arms with different angle mount points!


Yet most “aftermarket” replacement bushes the industry standard is to eliminate these air voids in an attempt to improve both steering response and reduce wheel hop, loss of traction under brake and acceleration.


The opposite is often the case – the elimination of the air voids causes even more severe wheel hop, loss of traction through binding, locking up of arms.


K-MAC bushes – with 50 years now of bush technology are designed without the air voids but where needed with “full 2 axis movement”. Result is power to the ground – maximum traction/acceleration/braking - along with noticeably improved directional control and steering response for highway driving, lane changing.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2014 507 Tire Size Question - Again... Gurus Please Help!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:52 AM.