CLS63
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
CLS63
Who has driven this car? looking to maybe pick one up soon... they put down some serious numbers with a tune.. but i mainly want to know, does this car "feel" heavy? i'm guessing with that motor, no.
talking 2012 body here.
talking 2012 body here.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
2011 E550 4Matic & 2010 Audi Q5 & 2015 C63 507
Yes, heavy and long but it has a strong engine to get to 0-60 in 3.5 seconds with twin turbos engines. For NA engines, they are a bit slower because they might not have 4Matic in 2012. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
#3
Banned
Definitely going to feel bulky compared to a C class but the power of the M157 easily moves this car in a straight line.
Some downpipes and a tune, slight drop with some wheels and the car is perfect. You won't be disappointed I can promise you that.
Some downpipes and a tune, slight drop with some wheels and the car is perfect. You won't be disappointed I can promise you that.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
yea, that is literally all i want to do.
it's between the cls, and m6
Trending Topics
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
yea that is literally all you need dp, and tune. highway killer.
i like the *** of the m6 more, along with the interior, but i love the nose of the cls. tough decision
#9
the cls is a big car, me personally id suggest e63s if you want more power out of a twin turbo engine.
those things are monsters and they arent as big as a cls
the more i think about it the more i really think twin turbo is the way to go, you can get cheap power compared to a NA engine
those things are monsters and they arent as big as a cls
the more i think about it the more i really think twin turbo is the way to go, you can get cheap power compared to a NA engine
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
the cls is a big car, me personally id suggest e63s if you want more power out of a twin turbo engine.
those things are monsters and they arent as big as a cls
the more i think about it the more i really think twin turbo is the way to go, you can get cheap power compared to a NA engine
those things are monsters and they arent as big as a cls
the more i think about it the more i really think twin turbo is the way to go, you can get cheap power compared to a NA engine
e is about 200lbs lighter than cls. or so i read..
the E blends in too much imo. talking 2012 body..
the cls headlights alone look awesome
#11
MBWorld Fanatic!
the cls is a big car, me personally id suggest e63s if you want more power out of a twin turbo engine.
those things are monsters and they arent as big as a cls
the more i think about it the more i really think twin turbo is the way to go, you can get cheap power compared to a NA engine
those things are monsters and they arent as big as a cls
the more i think about it the more i really think twin turbo is the way to go, you can get cheap power compared to a NA engine
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
I've also had an '09 C63, a 2007 R350, a 2008 C350, an FX35, an MDX, two Tacomas, a Merkur XR4Ti, a Galant GS, two Mini Cooper S, a Tahoe, a C1500, an Accord, a Civic, two Dodge Colts, a 1964 Beetle, a Ford Bronco, a Ford Thunderbird, 2 Chevrolet Astro Vans, a 1977 Lincoln Continental, a 1974 Pontiac something-or-other, a 2008 Toyota Corolla, a 1977 Datsun B210, 1984 Corvette, a 1971 Datsun 510, a Corvair Corsa, 2 Suzuki GS550's, a Honda XT125, a CT110, a '65 Honda Dream 305 and probably 5-6 other vehicles I've forgotten about! Believe me, my mind is WIDE OPEN. Ask my wife.
Last edited by HBC350; 09-18-2015 at 05:17 PM.