C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tech help! Camber adjustment C63 W204 (rear rubbing issue)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 29, 2016 | 02:17 PM
  #1  
L.C.A.D.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
'13 MB c63 AMG
Tech help! Camber adjustment C63 W204 (rear rubbing issue)

Hey guys,

I have a '13 C63 AMG lowered on KW V3's DDC coilovers. I have upgraded my rear wheels from the multispokes OEM 19's (spec:19x9 ET54 w/ 255/30/19 conti tires) to 19's ZE40's (spec: 19x9.5 ET49 w/ 265/35/19 R888 tires).
I rub pretty bad on the rear right side whenever I turn left in normal driving conditions. I'm really looking to deal with this annoying issue because I purchased these wheels and tires for track purposes.
I looked into quality adjustable camber arms or bushings info on the forum, and there doesn't seem to have many options available. I found stuff on K-Mac kits (pricey) and SPC (I contacted SPC and they were not sure the kit was available for AMG's, they are going to get back to me on Tuesday).

Now, I know the 35 profile doesn't help, and was frustrated since I ordered 265/30 but realized they shipped me the wrong size after rubbing while test driving the car...

However, I don't rub on the rear left side while turning right.

Here are my rear values after alignment was done:

Camber: -2.5 left / -2.1 right (optimal from alignment software is between -2.3 and -1.5 and recommended is -1.9)

With an adjustable camber option, I could set it up to -2.5 instead of -2.1 and that would MAYBE solve the problem. However, my question would then become if that is too much negative camber, resulting in excessive unequal tire wear?

Have any of you guys experience with camber adjustement on this platform? What would you guys advise?

Thank you so much for your help!
Attached Thumbnails Tech help! Camber adjustment C63 W204 (rear rubbing issue)-2016-05-26-19.21.52.jpg   Tech help! Camber adjustment C63 W204 (rear rubbing issue)-2016-05-26-19.22.05.jpg  
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 02:24 PM
  #2  
medamullet's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 162
Likes: 11
2011 C63 AMG
Originally Posted by L.C.A.D.
Hey guys,

I have a '13 C63 AMG lowered on KW V3's DDC coilovers. I have upgraded my rear wheels from the multispokes OEM 19's (spec:19x9 ET54 w/ 255/30/19 conti tires) to 19's ZE40's (spec: 19x9.5 ET49 w/ 265/35/19 R888 tires).
I rub pretty bad on the rear right side whenever I turn left in normal driving conditions. I'm really looking to deal with this annoying issue because I purchased these wheels and tires for track purposes.
I looked into quality adjustable camber arms or bushings info on the forum, and there doesn't seem to have many options available. I found stuff on K-Mac kits (pricey) and SPC (I contacted SPC and they were not sure the kit was available for AMG's, they are going to get back to me on Tuesday).

Now, I know the 35 profile doesn't help, and was frustrated since I ordered 265/30 but realized they shipped me the wrong size after rubbing while test driving the car...

However, I don't rub on the rear left side while turning right.

Here are my rear values after alignment was done:

Camber: -2.5 left / -2.1 right (optimal from alignment software is between -2.3 and -1.5 and recommended is -1.9)

With an adjustable camber option, I could set it up to -2.5 instead of -2.1 and that would MAYBE solve the problem. However, my question would then become if that is too much negative camber, resulting in excessive unequal tire wear?

Have any of you guys experience with camber adjustement on this platform? What would you guys advise?

Thank you so much for your help!
If you're tracking your car you need to run the proper camber for the track and tires not to prevent rubbing. Raise your car up or roll and pull your fenders to stop the rubbing.
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 03:08 PM
  #3  
sirius9's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 211
Likes: 44
From: Hampshire, Great Britain
W204 C63 saloon
The only way around this is to either roll/pull fenders or order tires with narrower side wall (ie not bulging) or mill the inside of the left rear wheel by 2-3mm to make it ET 51-52.

Reason is becoz of the way Mercedes subframe is set up. U will find that looking from the rear, your left side rear (ie Drivers side) stick out more than the right side, despite similar camber, tires and ET on both wheels.

I had similar issues with mine (in UK) when I bought ET40 wheels on the rear, the right side (drivers side) stick out more and was rubbing as mine was lowered on H&R springs.
I had to have the rear wheel milled by 3-4mm to solve this.

Hope this helps.
Reply
Old May 29, 2016 | 03:48 PM
  #4  
BLKROKT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,074
Likes: 2,867
From: Los Angeles
2012 P31 C63 Coupe Trackrat, 2019 GLE63S Coupe Beast
You have 4 options:
1. KMac - probably won't fix your problem, and you don't need any more camber in back
2. raise the height of the car - does it have to be that low
3. roll fenders - you can get about 10-15mm more clearance
4. new tires - obvious

Honestly, it doesn't help that you ordered wheels with totally wrong offsets - I wouldn't be surprised if you had an inch of clearance to the suspension on the inside. I mean, it could be the angle, but look at how far your rims are sticking out past the fender. I have 10" wide rims in back with 285/30 Dunlop r-comps (which run more like a 295) and it sits totally flush and I just rolled/pulled the fenders a bit and no problemo.

Good luck.

Last edited by BLKROKT; May 29, 2016 at 04:12 PM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2016 | 07:19 AM
  #5  
L.C.A.D.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
'13 MB c63 AMG
Thank you guys for your inputs!
I'll start by looking into how much more room I can get with rolling the fenders.

As for camber adjustment, I imagine values differ from wheels, tires and tracks, right? Are there any other options than K-Macs? How much negative camber can you have?
Reply
Old May 30, 2016 | 08:39 AM
  #6  
Mort's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,649
Likes: 484
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
There is a metal tab in the fastening system between the bumper and quarter panel/fender joint. Looks like you are rubbing on it. You might be able to remove the inner fender liner and grind the metal tab down a little. That might give you some relief from the worst of the rubbing if not correct it all together.

KMAC's camber bushings will allow you to set your camber so that it is equal side to side and maybe lower the more negative side to within spec. I don't think you should increase your camber values past the -2.5*, you already have, to solve your rubbing issues. I think you are already maxed out on your rear cambers for street driving. You will likely just increase tire wear and maybe cause some handling issues.

Last edited by Mort; May 30, 2016 at 08:43 AM.
Reply
Old May 30, 2016 | 02:51 PM
  #7  
Kriston's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 409
C63 AMG
You have 35 profile tires out back. That will be 1 main reason for your rubbing. Drop down to a 265/30/19 and then check back with us.

You can get adjustable camber arms for the W204. But before you play with any more negative camber, swap your tires to the correct size.

You rub on the passenger rear because that's where the battery is. Another 40-50 LBS of dead weight right over your wheel.
Reply
Old May 30, 2016 | 04:41 PM
  #8  
Wobble64's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 53
From: Cincinnati Area
C63 507 with BS Body; 2008 SLK 55
As was said before, by lowering you will get higher negative camber automatically. When I installed my Clubsport coilovers and went really low, I bought KMacs to LOWER my camber. Even on track, you do not really need more than 2-2.5 degrees in the rear (around 3.5 in the front). Your rims outer edge is 11 mm further out than stock and the 35 cross section does not help.
Milling a part of the inner section of the rim off is dangerous, as the amount of metal where the lugnuts hold the rim to the knuckle, gets thinner. Not a good idea at all, especially if you consider tracking the car.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 31, 2016 | 07:20 AM
  #9  
L.C.A.D.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
'13 MB c63 AMG
Originally Posted by sirius9
The only way around this is to either roll/pull fenders or order tires with narrower side wall (ie not bulging) or mill the inside of the left rear wheel by 2-3mm to make it ET 51-52.

Reason is becoz of the way Mercedes subframe is set up. U will find that looking from the rear, your left side rear (ie Drivers side) stick out more than the right side, despite similar camber, tires and ET on both wheels.

I had similar issues with mine (in UK) when I bought ET40 wheels on the rear, the right side (drivers side) stick out more and was rubbing as mine was lowered on H&R springs.
I had to have the rear wheel milled by 3-4mm to solve this.

Hope this helps.
Yeah I am considering this option as well, just unsure how risky it is and how the wheel can sustain it?
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 07:25 AM
  #10  
L.C.A.D.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
'13 MB c63 AMG
Originally Posted by Mort
There is a metal tab in the fastening system between the bumper and quarter panel/fender joint. Looks like you are rubbing on it. You might be able to remove the inner fender liner and grind the metal tab down a little. That might give you some relief from the worst of the rubbing if not correct it all together.

KMAC's camber bushings will allow you to set your camber so that it is equal side to side and maybe lower the more negative side to within spec. I don't think you should increase your camber values past the -2.5*, you already have, to solve your rubbing issues. I think you are already maxed out on your rear cambers for street driving. You will likely just increase tire wear and maybe cause some handling issues.
Thanks for your input. I agree more negative camber wouldn't be good, so K-Mac will likely won't be my first option at this point. Maybe later to even both sides.
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 07:28 AM
  #11  
L.C.A.D.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
'13 MB c63 AMG
Originally Posted by Kriston
You have 35 profile tires out back. That will be 1 main reason for your rubbing. Drop down to a 265/30/19 and then check back with us.

You can get adjustable camber arms for the W204. But before you play with any more negative camber, swap your tires to the correct size.

You rub on the passenger rear because that's where the battery is. Another 40-50 LBS of dead weight right over your wheel.
Thanks. Good point regarding the battery on the rear passenger side. I know the 35 profile is an issue, I wonder how much difference the 30 profile would make though. It's frustrating I received the wrong tires in the first place, and anyway I should have checked but was too eager I guess.
I'll see how much space I can get with rolling the fenders and may buy or get my tires replaced with a 30 profile.
Reply
Old May 31, 2016 | 07:33 AM
  #12  
L.C.A.D.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
'13 MB c63 AMG
Originally Posted by Wobble64
As was said before, by lowering you will get higher negative camber automatically. When I installed my Clubsport coilovers and went really low, I bought KMacs to LOWER my camber. Even on track, you do not really need more than 2-2.5 degrees in the rear (around 3.5 in the front). Your rims outer edge is 11 mm further out than stock and the 35 cross section does not help.
Milling a part of the inner section of the rim off is dangerous, as the amount of metal where the lugnuts hold the rim to the knuckle, gets thinner. Not a good idea at all, especially if you consider tracking the car.
Thanks for your input. I agree with you milling the wheel is also not my favorite option, but anything that will help I will consider for now.
It seems for some reason rear camber is setup differently from the start by Mercedes on this car, lowering just makes it worse. Like I said, I will see how rolling the fenders help, and will look into having my tires replaced or either purchase a 30 tire profile. This situation sucks though.
BTW, the Clubsport must be awesome at the track, but how's your ride on the streets?
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE