Headers inner diameter
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
2005 E46 M3 - sold 2013 C63 Coupe
Headers inner diameter
I'm looking to fabricate my own headers, specififically in the mid power range. As of now, I'm looking towards a 4-2-1 setup. My question is, what inner diameter would be optimal for each section/transition? Understood there are many factors involved, just seeing if there is a rule of thumb for our engines, Or if I should follow the theoretical formula for scavaging?. Any insight would be greatly appreciated!!
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,493
Received 431 Likes
on
354 Posts
2012 C63;1971 280SE 3.5(Sold);2023 EQS 450 SUV 4 Matic (Wife's)
I have no idea of how to do the calculations but 4 into 1 Long tubes ( collector after the final bend) are generally 1 7/8 " primaries on the M156. MBH is using 2" primaries on his Tri-Wye Long tubes. Some people say 2" primaries on the tri-wye are a little too large for NA but more suitable for FI but it may just be the design of the tri-wye vs the 4 into 1.
Last edited by Mort; 09-09-2018 at 11:06 PM.
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
I would not go 2in primaries unless you want to supercharge down the road.
I would also stay stock piping and just go catless.i know people will say I'm crazy but the car does lose throttle responce when you go full 3in piping and 2in primaries.
dynos show wot runs and dont exactly show how the car feels part throttle on the street
I would also stay stock piping and just go catless.i know people will say I'm crazy but the car does lose throttle responce when you go full 3in piping and 2in primaries.
dynos show wot runs and dont exactly show how the car feels part throttle on the street
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
2005 E46 M3 - sold 2013 C63 Coupe
I wouldn't go 2" or wider. Just interesting how they work well without FI. Wondering what was intentional or prioritized (ie., bends, diameter, and fitment) as opposed to a by-product (ie., HP)