C63 AMG (W204) 2008 - 2015
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Comparision between the m156 (6.2L) to a 392(6.4L)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-05-2019 | 10:31 PM
  #51  
brad65ford's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 654
Likes: 73
From: SWF
2020GLC63
Originally Posted by AMG6.3
OP if 392 has higher TQ numbers early in power band is due to the rear end gear ratio in the Dodge is higher than vs the MB this more TQ.
This is probably the best piece of information I didn't think about. If I'm guessing correctly the w204 c63's are 2.82 gear ratio, and the 392's are 3.09. Not much of a difference but still something.
Old 08-12-2019 | 11:50 AM
  #52  
Texas E63's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 289
From: Houston, TX
Built 2008 G55 & one big 80 Series LandCruiser !
Add to the mix LTH's and E85 for the M156, and some other minor bolt-ons and 520rwhp is doable .... while the SLS stuff makes amazing HP it does cost a ton and drops torque on the lower end, and then there's the cost....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Comparision between the m156 (6.2L) to a 392(6.4L)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 PM.