C63 AMG (W206) 2022 - (Upcoming AMG)

who actually wants a w206 C63?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-27-2023, 10:07 PM
  #101  
Senior Member
 
eatmydust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 354
Received 43 Likes on 35 Posts
2020 C43, 2008 E350
Originally Posted by CarlosAMGBR
The new C 63 S is such a joke and such an awful value proposition, that you are either crazy or stupid to buy it. It keeps none of the factors that make an AMG an AMG, its crazy complex, its crazy expensive and fugly. A ****ty overstressed 4 cylinder engine, with a crazy complex and heavy hybrid system that adds so much weight the car has the weight of an AMG GT 63 S.

Its awful, it represents everything wrong with the current Mercedes line up and its ****ty products. The brand has lost its way. I am proud to say I own a W 204 C 63 AMG. I would never be proud of owning this awful 4 cylinder jokes.

I hope it flops miserably so Mercedes learns that we don't want stupid screens, stupid gimmicks, the stupid TikTok integration (WTF), we want V8 cars with awesome build quality, with the usual Mercedes smell, and refinement. Not some overpriced joke. To make matters worse, Mercedes even screwed up their build quality, the W206 feels 2 cuts below the W205/W204 in build quality. Such a shame.

Why are you going and posting this same thing everywhere? Let it go man jesus.
The following 2 users liked this post by eatmydust:
AV1 (08-03-2023), AzurSL (07-29-2023)
Old 07-28-2023, 04:37 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
cls5504matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 478
Received 120 Likes on 108 Posts
C63 Vert
Watch collecting taught me that more expensive things aren't always better and that newer isn't always better.
Old 07-28-2023, 04:49 PM
  #103  
Super Member
 
Dima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 158 Likes on 126 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by cls5504matic
Watch collecting taught me that more expensive things aren't always better and that newer isn't always better.
it's a bit different though, cheap quartz watch might be more accurate than Patek, but you buy craftsmanship, history, rarity and value retention.
Old 07-28-2023, 04:57 PM
  #104  
Senior Member
 
cls5504matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 478
Received 120 Likes on 108 Posts
C63 Vert
Originally Posted by Dima
it's a bit different though, cheap quartz watch might be more accurate than Patek, but you buy craftsmanship, history, rarity and value retention.

and a rolex submariner gmt or daytona will beat out almost any patek and audemars while keeping much better time under real world hard use.

i bought an ap royal oak at 17 and learned this.
Old 07-28-2023, 05:08 PM
  #105  
Super Member
 
Dima's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 158 Likes on 126 Posts
AMG
Originally Posted by cls5504matic
and a rolex submariner gmt or daytona will beat out almost any patek and audemars while keeping much better time under real world hard use.

i bought an ap royal oak at 17 and learned this.
You know how AMG technician builds an engine? Rolex uses machines for most of its watch assembly, AP and Patek use much less. Rolex is more robust, AP is more jewelry-like and Patek has best complications.
Also Rolex produces many many more watches.
Ok enough about watches otherwise they'll shut the thread down.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: who actually wants a w206 C63?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 PM.