blackbenzz

Nice! Any idea how much these cars weigh? Looking forward to the tune numbers! This might be my next car

RDOCA

3924

RW Carbon

Damn these are some impressive numbers. Can't wait to see this thing hopped up performance parts!!

Will617

Aman's c63s without the Pano was 3865. Pano weighs 190 lbs

blackbenzz

Thanks. Sub 4k is not bad at all. Is this with a spare etc? I'm gonna go test drive one this weekend. I got a 15 S5 but it's so slow

Will617

Correct, with spare

Test drive will impress you. I thought I was ready for my test drive but the feel and the exhaust note with its pops and crackles is amazing. Have fun

RDOCA

I didn't think they had a spare??? I thought they use the MOE (extended) tire somewhat like a run flat but not same spec.

blackbenzz

Nice I can't wait to drive it! I'm used to driving fast cars so this will be nothing new but I think would make a good daily driver

Will617

Remember the front tires are smaller then the rear tires so it has to be one of those narrow ones.
Most BMW's have run flats so there is no spare at all

betrezra

BlackBenz - glad to see you tune in here. I got rid of the clk55 Kleemann and got into one of these C63S. I bet if you turned your tuning/mod skills loose on this platform we would see some major et's........... but I'm sure you already know what Jerry has cooking for this.

blackbenzz

Oh nice I didn't know, congrats!!! I've found the major constraints on Benzes are in the tuning. Do you know if these have forged internals from the factory or do you have to get a special package like the P31 in the W204 C63 to get forged pistons? I picked up a 2015 Audi S5 as a daily in November. Styling and interior are amazing but it lacks power. Does great for the snow we get up here though

betrezra

BB - Yup. forges rods, pistons. Not sure about crank. And per amg rep there is plenty of extra boost cap on the table.. as shown by the 4 cyl turbo cars. 3-6psi dep on who you talk too.

I would love to see you throw your enthusiasm/skills at this platform...... 9's!

b0kix

Bone stock made 415 whp on our mustang dyno in 90 deg weather....

Iceman II

That's quite a drop off from OPs numbers. The weather is about the same too.

betrezra

there is a difference, so much, people will go to the less conservative for bragging rights.

Will617

That's by far the lowest. Doesn't sound right somehow

houstonT

I was on a dynojet machine which historically reads higher than a mustang dyno. Furthermore what cf was the 415 rwhp? My uncorrected number was 455 rwhp, 95 degree heat and Houston humidity.

b0kix

This was done on our mustang dyno reads very low and it was 90 deg weather outside.

blackbenzz

The dyno should have a temp reading. Shouldn't base the temps on outside temperature

Vic55

All that matters is who wins on the street dyno (run em) ... way too many variables on rollers.

Will617

C63 Correction. No spare. Electric compressor pump with "slime kit" in trunk.

blackbenzz

I see you're still ballin on here

JPMBenz

My car weighed in at 4,065 pounds with a full tank of fuel, pano, and standard seats...

spacegeek

I think we need several (two or more) cars on the same type of dyno, same environment to baseline the engine. I'm not sure how accurate the "corrected" or "loss" calculations are. Seems they vary depending on who you ask.

TheOtherDodge

Nice!