C63/C63S AMG
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C63S vs 997 C2S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-11-2016, 06:32 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
7th_gear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C63S 997.1 C2S
C63S vs 997 C2S

Happen to own both cars, so a short review:

The look
Porsche is more eye catching no matter which generation it belongs to, while the C63S might summon more trained eyes to appreciate, which means it is more subtle.

Adore the front of the C63S, but the rear is too mudane and varies little versus the other C-class. 997's rear is also too timid, but looks better than 996. 991 is really cool, especially 991.2.

The Interior
Well, no comparison here, C63S is hands down in all aspects. After all, it is almost 10 years apart in term of technological advancement. Same level of interior rattles, when the car is collected brand new, both needs time to blend-in, I hope...

The audio
Engine sound, C63S is obvously more outspoken, while the flat six in the 997 is always sounded a little bit lazy (the same to my preivous Subaru WRX Sti). When you rev both cars, they are just as adrenaline-pumping, and the Merc rev faster and reached a certain speed faster as there is more power and torque to it.
I have the Bermeister options in the Mercedes which I find the high pitch are really sweet, but bass lack the reasonable punch at normal settings. While in the Porsche, despite the lesser filtered engine noise, the audio is more in your face and really more sporty. I guess this is the manufacturers' positioning.

The feel behind the steering wheel
Well, despite it's a decade-old technology, the steering feel of the 997 is so precise and leaning to heavy weighted, that provided the road information to the driver. C63S steering is light, and will sudden gained weight in the middle of a corner, a bit unnatural, and in general it's too feather light. Feedback is lagged and let's blame the omission of the hydraulic system. Ride on the other hand is exceptionally comfortable in C mode of the Merc, I experienced the Sport mode, which is pretty close to the ride feel of 997. Comfort mode is really more suitable for city traffic amid the road condition in this part of the world. RR has it advantage here, as I found it is more easier to have a lose rear end in the Merc than in the 997, I have the Dunlop Maxx RT MO1 which I guess is really inferior to the Michelin PSS on the 997 barring the difference in engine position (FR vs RR) and size (265 vs 305).

Enjoy both cars, really different characters and commands different mentality when driving them. Will post more comment later, cheers all.
Old 02-11-2016, 11:02 AM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
callmiro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,515
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
2016 C63 S


I've got a C4S with a Single Turbo and straight exhaust. Sounds incredible.


The two are apples and oranges, but you definitely get way more attention in a 911. Its always been an aspirational achievement for the masses.

You get a Porsche and you made it...and people notice.


Old 02-11-2016, 09:55 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
7th_gear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C63S 997.1 C2S
No offense as I adore both cars, as you said, I am comparing apple to orange, just that I need a proper sedan as kids no longer fit in the back, and looking to share some thoughts.

Old 09-01-2020, 08:13 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
JL1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 38
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2016 c300 4matic
Edit - wrong thread

Last edited by JL1000; 09-01-2020 at 08:52 PM.
Old 09-01-2020, 08:49 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
FLC63s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Flat Earth
Posts: 1,453
Received 399 Likes on 307 Posts
AMG C63s Sedan , AMG C43 , AMG G63 , GLK 250
Originally Posted by JL1000
I have a 2018 c43 sedan with jb4 only and on map2 with 3 gallons of e85 I can tick off 12.0@115mph 1/4 all day long in warm weather and in colder weather high 11s with a best of 11.7 @ 118. 0 to 60s best of 3.6 and always under 4 seconds. I briefly brake torque up to 2200 rpm and let off. Tc in sport and suspension in comfort. I have no idea how you could even brake torque up to 5k.
and ??? What does that have to do with this thread ??
Old 09-01-2020, 08:53 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
JL1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 38
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
2016 c300 4matic
Originally Posted by FLC63s
and ??? What does that have to do with this thread ??
nothing- wrong thread lol
The following users liked this post:
IvanC63S (09-02-2020)
Old 09-02-2020, 09:15 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
elitex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: ATL
Posts: 385
Received 95 Likes on 76 Posts
2020 C63S Coupe, 2021 Bmw X5M Competition
I am really itching for another Porsche in my life. Thinking Cayman GT4 (Long gearing is a big detractor) and keeping the C63 or maybe GT3. GT3 prices are so close to Mclaren 600LT (Already owned 570s)..... And there's my deilema., I can't make up my mind.

As nice as the C63 is, it just cannot compete with a proper sports car. At least not on feel and performance. And performance is not necessarily straight line speed.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C63S vs 997 C2S



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM.