😒 CONFIRMED: FACELIFT C63S HAVE SMALLER TURBOS
#101
We have turbos here from a 2020, a 2017 and a 2016. and have measured the comp and turbine wheels. There is no difference, so whoever said there is maybe needs to check again. There is a difference in the inlet manifolds though (not the airboxes). they are a lot smaller.
The following 3 users liked this post by ZAC MOTORSPORT:
#104
Super Member
Thread Starter
Please tell me, when you drive the FL did you feel it didn't have the same rush as the older car? Because I'm telling you, the FACELIFT C63s does not feel like the PREFACELIFT. You can bash me all you want but there is no doubt about it. This and the faux engine noise is why I did not trade in and I was ready with cash............ I took the time to write a whole review thread on this and got flame grilled of course........... lol
The facelift just doesn't have that urgency to me. It's got power but it doesn't have that lunacy and crazy gut wrenching acceleration like the pfl!!!!! Especially in 3rd gear. It's how it felt to me and I want to know if you feel this too???.............
Regards,
George Lisciandro
The following users liked this post:
Jimmy_c63s (09-09-2020)
#105
SPONSOR
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Australia, with warehouse in HK
Posts: 350
Received 75 Likes
on
56 Posts
AMGs :)
Zac............ thank u.
Please tell me, when you drive the FL did you feel it didn't have the same rush as the older car? Because I'm telling you, the FACELIFT C63s does not feel like the PREFACELIFT. You can bash me all you want but there is no doubt about it. This and the faux engine noise is why I did not trade in and I was ready with cash............ I took the time to write a whole review thread on this and got flame grilled of course........... lol
The facelift just doesn't have that urgency to me. It's got power but it doesn't have that lunacy and crazy gut wrenching acceleration like the pfl!!!!! Especially in 3rd gear. It's how it felt to me and I want to know if you feel this too???.............
Regards,
George Lisciandro
Please tell me, when you drive the FL did you feel it didn't have the same rush as the older car? Because I'm telling you, the FACELIFT C63s does not feel like the PREFACELIFT. You can bash me all you want but there is no doubt about it. This and the faux engine noise is why I did not trade in and I was ready with cash............ I took the time to write a whole review thread on this and got flame grilled of course........... lol
The facelift just doesn't have that urgency to me. It's got power but it doesn't have that lunacy and crazy gut wrenching acceleration like the pfl!!!!! Especially in 3rd gear. It's how it felt to me and I want to know if you feel this too???.............
Regards,
George Lisciandro
The following users liked this post:
Jimmy_c63s (09-09-2020)
#106
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,452
Received 501 Likes
on
339 Posts
700HP Facelift converted PFL C63 S Coupe
Thanks for the info, Zac. Like everyone else, I also wonder why they did this. I mean, this must affect power if the facelift c63s inlets are much smaller, right?
#107
SPONSOR
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Australia, with warehouse in HK
Posts: 350
Received 75 Likes
on
56 Posts
AMGs :)
#108
Senior Member
They use the same manifold on the GLC and the motor mounts are different, so instead of making two different parts, they make one part for both cars...at least that's my theory.
#110
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,452
Received 501 Likes
on
339 Posts
700HP Facelift converted PFL C63 S Coupe
The rear of the FL intake manifolds are a lot smaller. Without doing CFD on them (not happening, too complicated to draw) It looks to me like they are trying to increase throttle response at the expense of top end power. Speculation though.. I thought it may have been a packaging issue with the new engine mounts, but externally the mounts are the same.
Here are two photos I have from looking around last night. Is this what you're explaining? Ones got a noticeably bigger chamber and the other is skinnier?
Apart from being left and right examples, these are the correct intake manifolds for PFL & FL yes?
Last edited by Jimmy_c63s; 09-09-2020 at 10:53 PM.
#111
SPONSOR
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Australia, with warehouse in HK
Posts: 350
Received 75 Likes
on
56 Posts
AMGs :)
Searched through EPC and part numbers are also different for FL and PFL.
Here are two photos I have from looking around last night. Is this what you're explaining? Ones got a noticeably bigger chamber and the other is skinnier?
Apart from being left and right examples, these are the correct intake manifolds for PFL & FL yes?
Here are two photos I have from looking around last night. Is this what you're explaining? Ones got a noticeably bigger chamber and the other is skinnier?
Apart from being left and right examples, these are the correct intake manifolds for PFL & FL yes?
#112
Member
The rear of the FL intake manifolds are a lot smaller. Without doing CFD on them (not happening, too complicated to draw) It looks to me like they are trying to increase throttle response at the expense of top end power. Speculation though.. I thought it may have been a packaging issue with the new engine mounts, but externally the mounts are the same.
#113
MBWorld Fanatic!
Generally speaking, for FI applications, you want more plenum volume that can be evenly distributed to each cylinder - so if the PFL intake manifold do indeed flow more CFM, it would make them better suited for high flow/horsepower applications over the FL design.
It’s possible that AMG had to redesign the intake manifolds for the FL C63 and GLC (they appear to be the same), because of the 9-speed MCT transmission. The 7-speed more than likely allowed for more room for larger intake plenums.
The following users liked this post:
Jimmy_c63s (09-11-2020)
#115
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 8,150
Received 3,686 Likes
on
2,461 Posts
2019 C63CS
There's already a long thread on this from last year. Have fun reading it. Don't remember quite what the ultimately conclusion was, but it's essentially irrelevant if even correct. Size matters for response. Smaller turbos are more responsive. The main question is are they efficient for the rated power and that they are. The FL has generally been faster than the PFL, partly because of the transmission as well. Tuning is a different story and if done right requires upgraded turbos anyway. The stock turbos even in the PFL simply can't handle more top end. Most tunes only add more low to mid range torque and power instead of adding more power at the top where you really want it. You need to upgrade the turbos to handle more power at the top. Look at CarBahn's tune with upgraded turbos.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-c63s-...er-turbos.html
https://mbworld.org/forums/c63-c63s-...er-turbos.html
Last edited by superswiss; 04-24-2021 at 05:08 PM.
#116