This is might be the highest number stage 2 record?
what was the correction factor number ? What gear was used and why are you not posting the tenps and baro pressure..
I'm sorry but you won't even make that much torque with ptg 1200 tubos and a 200 shot of nitrous.
how much timing are you running? How much boost? Post up some data logs for us while your at it.
what was the correction factor number ? What gear was used and why are you not posting the tenps and baro pressure..
I'm sorry but you won't even make that much torque with ptg 1200 tubos and a 200 shot of nitrous.
how much timing are you running? How much boost? Post up some data logs for us while your at it.
(was a test version)
Last edited by srO_Michael_Orz; Aug 11, 2020 at 11:54 PM.
Send me the dyno files so I can post up the un corrected numbers.
I can dyno my car in second gear too bud and post 1200 rwt
This car is on a turbo melter tune and really is making 545whp 1.05 std lol
Last edited by skratch77; Aug 12, 2020 at 12:04 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Send me the files
Let's assume you car is in metric and you are posting ps and Newton meters for torque. with a 1.05 cf and converting to hp and ftlbs your car made 556whp and 660 rear wheel torque.
Send me the files
Let's assume you car is in metric and you are posting ps and Newton meters for torque. with a 1.05 cf and converting to hp and ftlbs your car made 556whp and 660 rear wheel torque.
Last edited by srO_Michael_Orz; Aug 12, 2020 at 12:23 AM.
Why don't you post sae or uncorrected numbers? Because you know it falls right inline with every other c63!
I could show uncorrected numbers or SAE CF numbers. But whats the point? Are you going to admit the truth? No! so why you keep asking? And since you saw it with you own eyes, then you still cant believe it.
You dont need to respond for this, let me help you with this one: "graph was done by Photoshop" "You put a different car on the dyno other than you claimed“ Or maybe:"You steal the dyno graph from others"......
Maybe the only way stop you is I have to hold a camera and keep it rolling from I top up pump gas to back the shop, open up the turbo inletpipe let you verify its stock turbo. And then strap down the car on the dyno make a run?
Oh BTW hope you take a look what you posted before, redo some simple math calculation. I even dont want to point out some simple conversion miscalculations.
Last edited by srO_Michael_Orz; Aug 13, 2020 at 01:57 AM.
I could show uncorrected numbers or SAE CF numbers. But whats the point? Are you going to admit the truth? No! so why you keep asking? And since you saw it with you own eyes, then you still cant believe it.
You dont need to respond for this, let me help you with this one: "graph was done by Photoshop" "You put a different car on the dyno other than you claimed“ Or maybe:"You steal the dyno graph from others"......
Maybe the only way stop you is I have to hold a camera and keep it rolling from I top up pump gas to back the shop, open up the turbo inletpipe let you verify its stock turbo. And then strap down the car on the dyno make a run?
Oh BTW hope you take a look what you posted before, redo some simple math calculation. I even dont want to point out some simple conversion miscalculations.
You can shout about your dyno numbers till you’re blue in the face. If you’re not trapping significantly higher than average for stage 1 only tunes on pump (126-127 mph), then all you have is a piece of printed paper with dyno queen numbers.
Honestly, I’d love to see you shut us all up by going to the track and trapping at least above 130 mph. And you should have no problem dipping into the 7’s 60-130 mph.
Instead of responding back to everyone why don’t you take your car out on a back road and get some real numbers?
You can shout about your dyno numbers till you’re blue in the face. If you’re not trapping significantly higher than average for stage 1 only tunes on pump (126-127 mph), then all you have is a piece of printed paper with dyno queen numbers.
Honestly, I’d love to see you shut us all up by going to the track and trapping at least above 130 mph. And you should have no problem dipping into the 7’s 60-130 mph.
Instead of responding back to everyone why don’t you take your car out on a back road and get some real numbers?
That’s my draggy record for now, Stage 2 by labworx, Instakes, Downpipes and running on 93 with 50/50 water-methanol. My 3rd run on a Mustang dyno was at 550 wheel HP and 648 lbs of torque. I NEVER SEEN A 600+ whp and that much torque from a tune with intakes and downpipes on 93. As you said, 60-130 times will prove








