Pre 2003 CL's
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, TX
2011 GL550, 2004 Audi S4 v8
Pre 2003 CL's
Hey everyone!
I had some questions about the 2000-2002 CL's. Can I get some feedback on how they compare from a 500, 55, 600? I only have about $17-19K to work with. If I could afford a 2003+ CL55 or 600 I'd go for it, but I can't.
I really want to know how good or bad a 2002 CL500 or CL55 are. What are some things I should know about. I know the 2003's+ are better.
I had some questions about the 2000-2002 CL's. Can I get some feedback on how they compare from a 500, 55, 600? I only have about $17-19K to work with. If I could afford a 2003+ CL55 or 600 I'd go for it, but I can't.
I really want to know how good or bad a 2002 CL500 or CL55 are. What are some things I should know about. I know the 2003's+ are better.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
CL500
Hey everyone!
I had some questions about the 2000-2002 CL's. Can I get some feedback on how they compare from a 500, 55, 600? I only have about $17-19K to work with. If I could afford a 2003+ CL55 or 600 I'd go for it, but I can't.
I really want to know how good or bad a 2002 CL500 or CL55 are. What are some things I should know about. I know the 2003's+ are better.
I had some questions about the 2000-2002 CL's. Can I get some feedback on how they compare from a 500, 55, 600? I only have about $17-19K to work with. If I could afford a 2003+ CL55 or 600 I'd go for it, but I can't.
I really want to know how good or bad a 2002 CL500 or CL55 are. What are some things I should know about. I know the 2003's+ are better.
Super Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
From: Mercerville New Jersey
1991 560SEC Teal 1989 420SEL Ice Blue 1984 500SEC White
I am following your thread because I would like to get a cl also, but which year what model ... Same questions I have over and over.
Hey everyone!
I had some questions about the 2000-2002 CL's. Can I get some feedback on how they compare from a 500, 55, 600? I only have about $17-19K to work with. If I could afford a 2003+ CL55 or 600 I'd go for it, but I can't.
I really want to know how good or bad a 2002 CL500 or CL55 are. What are some things I should know about. I know the 2003's+ are better.
I had some questions about the 2000-2002 CL's. Can I get some feedback on how they compare from a 500, 55, 600? I only have about $17-19K to work with. If I could afford a 2003+ CL55 or 600 I'd go for it, but I can't.
I really want to know how good or bad a 2002 CL500 or CL55 are. What are some things I should know about. I know the 2003's+ are better.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, TX
2011 GL550, 2004 Audi S4 v8
Well, I would love to buy an 03 CL55 or 600, but money isn't allowing me to. So an 02 will have to do.
I could end up being costly down the road with an 02, but I think with the right aftermarket warranty, I should be alright.
I've had two pre 2003 Mercedes, and had no problems. I'm beginning to think that I'll be alright with a 2002 CL55.
I can also afford a 2003 CL500, but my real question is will I be happy enough with a 500??? I love speed, can the 500 satisfy my long enough? Or sound I not waste my time and just get an older 55?
I'm not concerned much right now with better options on this compared to that year. I just want speed, handling, and some reliability. I doubt the reliability changed for the worst from a 2002 to a 2003 on a CL55....It's common knowledge not to get the first year of a model change
I guess my mind is made up. Let me know what you think BENZITCH....
I know the ABC is and will be a problem,but from what I read it doesn't matter the year, they all fail at some point.
I could end up being costly down the road with an 02, but I think with the right aftermarket warranty, I should be alright.
I've had two pre 2003 Mercedes, and had no problems. I'm beginning to think that I'll be alright with a 2002 CL55.
I can also afford a 2003 CL500, but my real question is will I be happy enough with a 500??? I love speed, can the 500 satisfy my long enough? Or sound I not waste my time and just get an older 55?
I'm not concerned much right now with better options on this compared to that year. I just want speed, handling, and some reliability. I doubt the reliability changed for the worst from a 2002 to a 2003 on a CL55....It's common knowledge not to get the first year of a model change
I guess my mind is made up. Let me know what you think BENZITCH....
I know the ABC is and will be a problem,but from what I read it doesn't matter the year, they all fail at some point.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
CL500
Well, I would love to buy an 03 CL55 or 600, but money isn't allowing me to. So an 02 will have to do.
I could end up being costly down the road with an 02, but I think with the right aftermarket warranty, I should be alright.
I've had two pre 2003 Mercedes, and had no problems. I'm beginning to think that I'll be alright with a 2002 CL55.
I can also afford a 2003 CL500, but my real question is will I be happy enough with a 500??? I love speed, can the 500 satisfy my long enough? Or sound I not waste my time and just get an older 55?
I'm not concerned much right now with better options on this compared to that year. I just want speed, handling, and some reliability. I doubt the reliability changed for the worst from a 2002 to a 2003 on a CL55....It's common knowledge not to get the first year of a model change
I guess my mind is made up. Let me know what you think BENZITCH....
I know the ABC is and will be a problem,but from what I read it doesn't matter the year, they all fail at some point.
I could end up being costly down the road with an 02, but I think with the right aftermarket warranty, I should be alright.
I've had two pre 2003 Mercedes, and had no problems. I'm beginning to think that I'll be alright with a 2002 CL55.
I can also afford a 2003 CL500, but my real question is will I be happy enough with a 500??? I love speed, can the 500 satisfy my long enough? Or sound I not waste my time and just get an older 55?
I'm not concerned much right now with better options on this compared to that year. I just want speed, handling, and some reliability. I doubt the reliability changed for the worst from a 2002 to a 2003 on a CL55....It's common knowledge not to get the first year of a model change
I guess my mind is made up. Let me know what you think BENZITCH....
I know the ABC is and will be a problem,but from what I read it doesn't matter the year, they all fail at some point.
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, TX
2011 GL550, 2004 Audi S4 v8
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Davis
Just so you know, most of the reason people say not to get the pre-'03 is not for reliability reasons. Also not for options reasons. Its the POWER - - there were HUGE increases both in the 600 and the 55 from 2002 to 2003. That's the main reason to go for '03 and newer. If you are looking at just the 500, then this doesn't matter for you.
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
New Mercedes-AMG SUVs Arrive With NEW V8 Engine: 12 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production
Verdad Gallardo
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, TX
2011 GL550, 2004 Audi S4 v8
Just so you know, most of the reason people say not to get the pre-'03 is not for reliability reasons. Also not for options reasons. Its the POWER - - there were HUGE increases both in the 600 and the 55 from 2002 to 2003. That's the main reason to go for '03 and newer. If you are looking at just the 500, then this doesn't matter for you.
Sorry, I don't mean to sound like an ***. It's been a very bad day for me at the Doctor's.
Also, Bo CL500, I can't test drive either unless I drive over 600 miles to find one. I live in Mobile, AL...they don't even know how to spell Mercedes
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, TX
2011 GL550, 2004 Audi S4 v8
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Davis
Now don't take this as the end all and complete answer, but I don't think the power difference by itself (aside from other AMG improvements) would be worth it. 0-60 drops from 6.5 to just under 6 seconds. Reference
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...500/index.html for road test of 2000 CL500
and
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html for road test of 2001 CL55.
Hopefully though, someone who has owned both or at least drive both can comment. Articles or reviews of the CL55 when it first came out are likely to mention a comparison against the "standard" at the time CL500 and whether it justified the minor price bump
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...500/index.html for road test of 2000 CL500
and
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html for road test of 2001 CL55.
Hopefully though, someone who has owned both or at least drive both can comment. Articles or reviews of the CL55 when it first came out are likely to mention a comparison against the "standard" at the time CL500 and whether it justified the minor price bump
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
CL500
i would get the 55 just so you know that you got the top of the line model. if you get the 500 you will always be wondering, what if i just spend the extra buck? but if you get the 55 there will not be any wondering. make sure whatever car you get its fully loaded. there is a comfort package, sports package, ect.... just cuz its the top end MB it dont mean it comes with every possible option, keep that in mind.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
CL500
Now don't take this as the end all and complete answer, but I don't think the power difference by itself (aside from other AMG improvements) would be worth it. 0-60 drops from 6.5 to just under 6 seconds. Reference
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...500/index.html for road test of 2000 CL500
and
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html for road test of 2001 CL55.
Hopefully though, someone who has owned both or at least drive both can comment. Articles or reviews of the CL55 when it first came out are likely to mention a comparison against the "standard" at the time CL500 and whether it justified the minor price bump
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...500/index.html for road test of 2000 CL500
and
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html for road test of 2001 CL55.
Hopefully though, someone who has owned both or at least drive both can comment. Articles or reviews of the CL55 when it first came out are likely to mention a comparison against the "standard" at the time CL500 and whether it justified the minor price bump
i thought the 500 was 6.1 fot the 0-60?
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,021
Likes: 3
From: Fort Worth, TX
2011 GL550, 2004 Audi S4 v8
i would get the 55 just so you know that you got the top of the line model. if you get the 500 you will always be wondering, what if i just spend the extra buck? but if you get the 55 there will not be any wondering. make sure whatever car you get its fully loaded. there is a comfort package, sports package, ect.... just cuz its the top end MB it dont mean it comes with every possible option, keep that in mind.
