CL600 vs CL63?
http://www.mercedes-benz.ca/index.cfm?id=507
Suffice it to say, we can barely wait. The dealer said it would get on the January production line and arrive in April, maybe March.
The one option we don't have is the iPod integration kit. Anyone know how complicated it would be to order it and have our dealer up here install it?



1- AMG Body kit (CL63)
2- Beautiful exhaust sound
3- Cheaper than the CL600
I'll be in a car that equalls or exceeds the 65 perfomance at a fraction of the cost.



I'll be in a car that equalls or exceeds the 65 perfomance at a fraction of the cost.
I'll be in a car that equalls or exceeds the 65 perfomance at a fraction of the cost.
However, if you meant that the CL600 would outperform the CL63 you "might" be right but by a small margin in a straight line only. Other than that CL63 will have the advantage over the CL600 especially in the track.
However, if you meant that the CL600 would outperform the CL63 you "might" be right but by a small margin in a straight line only. Other than that CL63 will have the advantage over the CL600 especially in the track.
All and all, personal prefference.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Soo... No 63 motor on any big bodied benz for me. Maybe on a C-class or CLK :P but not on S, CL, even smaller CLS (which I drove and it was OK, but still lacking Torque IMO)
Last edited by 2WT; Feb 23, 2007 at 09:54 PM. Reason: mityped
With racing exhaust, headers, cats, ECU, maybe somewhere over 750 horsepower is very possible.



All and all, personal prefference.
Now I am going to try to take a picture of my CL 600 and get it posted here but I have a small case of digital camera retardation and my wife is out of town. man that sounds sad.




I went with Renntech stage one and got 525 RWHP or around 655 crank hp. See Adam at EuroElites and he will hook you up!
Both the 63s are faster with less torque
Check www.youtube.com videos and other forums




http://www.dragtimes.com/compare2.ph...ame=Compare%21
The V12 biturbo really allows the owner to accelerate with smoothness and comfort; which is something i truly like about the 65/600 Mercedes.
And also, if there's couple of coins lying around, you can increase the displacement of the 600 engine!
Plus is not like I dont have a car to drive at the moment. Don't want to be stuck with a car I am not happy with for 2 - 3 years.
Leaning towards the cl600 with a nice bodykit and an engine ecu upgrade though.
Who cares about cl63 anyways is not like it can go on the track and out perform a porsche, and I don't go tracking.
Last edited by NY_SG; Feb 25, 2007 at 05:16 PM.
Plus is not like I dont have a car to drive at the moment. Don't want to be stuck with a car I am not happy with for 2 - 3 years.
Leaning towards the cl600 with a nice bodykit and an engine ecu upgrade though.
Who cares about cl63 anyways is not like it can go on the track and out perform a porsche, and I don't go tracking.
Stock Cl600 would be more than enough
http://www.dragtimes.com/compare2.ph...ame=Compare%21
I don't see the extra torque played any differences
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIaSzJyb08A
enjoy

Its true though you don't buy these cars to track and i do believe the 600 is faster than the 63 in a straight line but since I don't really drive that fast on a daily basis the looks and the handling of the amg cars definitely more than makes it all up for me, and when there is an occasion for me to have some fun on the highway i dont believe the cl is really lacking any grunt
If it does trying filling it up with the 100 octane gas.
But to each his own and i think the 600 is a fantastic car.My cousin just bought a brabus black s600 and it looked sick.

Here is pics of his Cl65 and SLR he is a benz freak.

I will take better pictures really soon.
Last edited by albert12183; May 22, 2008 at 06:25 PM.
The 63 is one of the best sounding cars in the mercedes line up, and stops on a dime. Not to mention I love the looks for a STOCK car. As for the 0-60 the factory says they are the same; 4.5, but I must admit the 600 with almost an extra 150 FT lbs of torgue feels a bit faster especially from 60 to 120... the power band is completely different and much smoother in the 600. In the 63 u get there but for what ever reason the 600 does it in a more elegant way. Maybe it is the exhaust in the 63 and the noise it makes when you punch it, don't get me wrong here I LOVE it, but I think the 600 is just a touch faster. Not to mention if you punch from a dead stop (with the traction control off) at around 45-55 MPH or so the rear end breaks loose once the turbos get going.
Either way you can't go wrong as these are 2 very stunning vehicles. The 600 leans to the classy elegant side while the 63 is all about RACING.
cheers...
The 63 is one of the best sounding cars in the mercedes line up, and stops on a dime. Not to mention I love the looks for a STOCK car. As for the 0-60 the factory says they are the same; 4.5, but I must admit the 600 with almost an extra 150 FT lbs of torgue feels a bit faster especially from 60 to 120... the power band is completely different and much smoother in the 600. In the 63 u get there but for what ever reason the 600 does it in a more elegant way. Maybe it is the exhaust in the 63 and the noise it makes when you punch it, don't get me wrong here I LOVE it, but I think the 600 is just a touch faster. Not to mention if you punch from a dead stop (with the traction control off) at around 45-55 MPH or so the rear end breaks loose once the turbos get going.
Either way you can't go wrong as these are 2 very stunning vehicles. The 600 leans to the classy elegant side while the 63 is all about RACING.
cheers...





