My Cl-a Total Lost Or Repairable?
#51
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yes, it is much more like a 6 than a 3 series....but that isn't saying much. 6's are 70k....CL's are 100k. Big difference. That is a 6 and 3 for a CL. BMW interiors are not even in the same area code as the CL interior.
#52
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2005 Chrysler 300c and 2004 Range Rover hse
Originally Posted by ndabunka
I always wonder why all these M3 lovers show up to ruin the party... ![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#53
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NSX
I am not going to speak for everyone, but I live in Boston where the M3 is the car of choice for every spoiled boy racer student that attends college here and has daddy buy them a car they can never appreciate. They are the most dangerous, most obnoxious drivers on the road, and all think that car is the coolest thing ever made. I have never been turned off by a group of owners as I am by M3 owners, mainly because of their driving habits.
That's just my experience here, and I am not saying it applies to everyone. Obviously the car is a good car and has made C&D's 10 best list many years in a row. Its just not a good car to compare to a CL. And I agree with MJR24 because I don't even think the 6 is as good as a CL, let alone the 3. I test drove 3 different versions of a 6, 3 times, and then bought a USED CL600 for more money than I could have bought a brand new 645ci for.
That's just my experience here, and I am not saying it applies to everyone. Obviously the car is a good car and has made C&D's 10 best list many years in a row. Its just not a good car to compare to a CL. And I agree with MJR24 because I don't even think the 6 is as good as a CL, let alone the 3. I test drove 3 different versions of a 6, 3 times, and then bought a USED CL600 for more money than I could have bought a brand new 645ci for.
#54
Originally Posted by BiTurboV12 AMG
Dont get an M3 they are over rated. you will hit your self in the head for getting one. the problem with the M3 is to go fast you have to be over 4,000 RPM and its just not practical on the street. and if you get SMG your really going to hate your self. take my word get a C55 AMG if you want a small fast car. even a CLK 500 is only a second off the pace of the M3 and you will love the CLK more cuse of having that torque it makes it more of a practical car. I am not saying the M3 is a bad car its just not a good street car its made for the track.
personaly I would go with the the c55 I would imagine it would be a more practical car although I have never driven one so I dont realy know for sure but all I can say is most merc sports seem very smooth and liveable, although bare in mind theres a new c in 2007!
p.s I also reckon the clk would be a very good choice.
#55
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bel Air, CA
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03 SL 500 Launch Edition, 98 ML 320 (sold), 01 S 500 (sold), 03 CLK 55 (sold)
Originally Posted by BLK 300C
TRUMP TOWERS TO A MOTEL 6??? ARE U KIDDING ME??? HOW ABOUT IF HE SAYS IM THINKING ABOUT A HONDA ACCORD, YOUR GONNA PUT THAT IN THE SAME CATEGORY OF MOTEL 6 WITH THE M3??? STOP TALKING OUT OF YOUR A$$. THE M3 IS SICK. YOUR STUCK ON THE PRICE BUDDY. JUS CUZ ITS 60K AND NOT 110+ DOESNT MAKE IT ANY LESS OF A CAR. MAYBE THE M3 ISNT AS LUXURIOUS AS THE CL CLASS BUT ITS DEFINETLY NOT A MOTEL 6 ![beat](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/beat.gif)
![beat](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/beat.gif)
Keep in mind, M is 1/3 of AMG.
65, body, casmiami, cost, frame, guaranteed, made, mercedes, perfect, progressive, repairable, repairs, shop, straighten, tv, unibody, vette
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)