Can't find any performance skid pad or 0-60 for 2008 CL65!!
03-10-2008, 05:43 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BEVERLY HILLS
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S550
Can't find any performance skid pad or 0-60 for 2008 CL65!!
I was googling info for 2008 cl65 cant find any.
I read that the S65 handles better than S63 is it true?
I think i cant find a good used S65 all asking to much money. Imma settle for less LOL.
I was just wondering if the CL65 is any good at the skidpad or 0-60? Hehe I am going to take some pictures of my friends CL65 it just arrived today. He is still trying to sell his CL63.
I read that the S65 handles better than S63 is it true?
I think i cant find a good used S65 all asking to much money. Imma settle for less LOL.
I was just wondering if the CL65 is any good at the skidpad or 0-60? Hehe I am going to take some pictures of my friends CL65 it just arrived today. He is still trying to sell his CL63.
03-10-2008, 05:45 AM
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: BEVERLY HILLS
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
S550
Oh he was asking if there is a way to make the exhaust sound little louder or louder without changing the mufflers
I suggested remove resonator...
I suggested remove resonator...
03-10-2008, 12:51 PM
#3
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2007 Escalade EXT, Stealth TT 600 AWHP
The S63 should handle better, as it weighs less. Suspension components are the same in both.
As for the CL, you can remove the resonator, but it gets obnoxious in the car from the exhaust drone. I dont recommend it. Mufflers are a better idea.
As for the CL, you can remove the resonator, but it gets obnoxious in the car from the exhaust drone. I dont recommend it. Mufflers are a better idea.
03-12-2008, 07:51 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2011 Hyundai Elantra GLS
[QUOTE=DynamicMotoring;2700550]The S63 should handle better, as it weighs less. Suspension components are the same in both.
QUOTE]
Actually, one of the several reputable magazines (i believe Brittish) concluded that the V12 was much more of a handler, and a better satisfying drive overall, after testing both back to back. Also, other magazines have had a consensus that the V12's superior torque made for a much better experience with the S Class weight.
QUOTE]
Actually, one of the several reputable magazines (i believe Brittish) concluded that the V12 was much more of a handler, and a better satisfying drive overall, after testing both back to back. Also, other magazines have had a consensus that the V12's superior torque made for a much better experience with the S Class weight.
03-12-2008, 09:39 PM
#5
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Lotus Elise SLK55
[QUOTE=Ferri;2705566]
That is correct. Most automotive critics preferred CL600 over CL63 hands down and S600 over S63. CL/S65 are on a totally different level and costs a lot more $$$
The S63 should handle better, as it weighs less. Suspension components are the same in both.
QUOTE]
Actually, one of the several reputable magazines (i believe Brittish) concluded that the V12 was much more of a handler, and a better satisfying drive overall, after testing both back to back. Also, other magazines have had a consensus that the V12's superior torque made for a much better experience with the S Class weight.
QUOTE]
Actually, one of the several reputable magazines (i believe Brittish) concluded that the V12 was much more of a handler, and a better satisfying drive overall, after testing both back to back. Also, other magazines have had a consensus that the V12's superior torque made for a much better experience with the S Class weight.
