Official Pics
Its great AMG is making the CLA all it can be.
If its light, and handles good, it might end up being the most track capable AMG yet and make the other AMG's look like posers.
Excluding the SLS BS of course.
Last edited by lunarx; Mar 27, 2013 at 10:11 AM.




Bet you the torque is instant
Why?
Go test drive the Kia Optima SX 2.0 turbo 4... zero lag. Amazing really. 274 hp and matching tq
Mercedes-AMG masters the essential challenges concerning the response of small-displacement turbo engines by means of a twin-scroll turbocharger, minimized restrictions in the exhaust system and an innovative injection strategy. The twin-scroll technology makes effective use of exhaust gas back pressure, temperature and momentum to provide a more spontaneous build-up of boost pressure. This results in a quicker build-up of torque from low revs. As a positive side effect, the twin-scroll technology also benefits fuel consumption and exhaust emissions. With a maximum boost pressure of 26.1 psi (1.8 bar), the AMG 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbo engine also leads the field in this respect.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




The raw hp numbers are similar but the engines couldn't be more different.
The C32 is 0-60 in 5.2 seconds mag times... This car is est 4.5 from MB... typically they undervalue their cars (see 55 amgs, 63 amgs, 550s, etc).
I am thinking the car will do 4.3 or 4.4 stock... with a tune its probably 4 seconds flat 0-60... for $50K, new AMG, they hit a homerun. I got rid of my CLS63 because the interior looked like an antique... This will be my new daily driver when it comes out AND its larger than the current w204
BTW the 2013 C63 with the new 5.5 TT engine .. MB claims 4.2 0-60...
FROM MBUSA:
2013 C63 AMG ... 5.5-liter biturbo V-8; Transmission: 7-speed AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT automatic; Performance: 518 hp, 516 lb-ft, 0 to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds
The trans in the new CLA45 will be better than the current offerings in the 2013 models across the line. The w205/ new S class, etc. will likely use the 7 speed DCT
Last edited by InTheBenz0; Mar 29, 2013 at 05:38 PM.
The raw hp numbers are similar but the engines couldn't be more different.
The C32 is 0-60 in 5.2 seconds mag times... This car is est 4.5 from MB... typically they undervalue their cars (see 55 amgs, 63 amgs, 550s, etc).
I am thinking the car will do 4.3 or 4.4 stock... with a tune its probably 4 seconds flat 0-60... for $50K, new AMG, they hit a homerun. I got rid of my CLS63 because the interior looked like an antique... This will be my new daily driver when it comes out AND its larger than the current w204
BTW the 2013 C63 with the new 5.5 TT engine .. MB claims 4.2 0-60...
FROM MBUSA:
2013 C63 AMG ... 5.5-liter biturbo V-8; Transmission: 7-speed AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT automatic; Performance: 518 hp, 516 lb-ft, 0 to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds
The trans in the new CLA45 will be better than the current offerings in the 2013 models across the line. The w205/ new S class, etc. will likely use the 7 speed DCT
The real deal will be 1/4 mile times and i forsee high 12s @ 110-112mph which is slightly better than a C32. I dont see this car faster than the current C63.
At 26psi i dont see how much more a tune can produce. I would like to see how the the twin scroll works in this setup
On a twisty track, it should do very well, with AWD, SMG and less weight than other AMG models.
Not saying its better than other AMG, but it should be a very potent drivers car.
With tunes and mods it will be decent at the drags too.
I won't comment on it's looks or the throttle response of its high strung 2.0T engine.
However, if it performs as I'm thinking, you will start seeing more AMG's at track days.
I think it's a good addition to the AMG line-up.
The raw hp numbers are similar but the engines couldn't be more different.
The C32 is 0-60 in 5.2 seconds mag times... This car is est 4.5 from MB... typically they undervalue their cars (see 55 amgs, 63 amgs, 550s, etc).
I am thinking the car will do 4.3 or 4.4 stock... with a tune its probably 4 seconds flat 0-60... for $50K, new AMG, they hit a homerun. I got rid of my CLS63 because the interior looked like an antique... This will be my new daily driver when it comes out AND its larger than the current w204
BTW the 2013 C63 with the new 5.5 TT engine .. MB claims 4.2 0-60...
FROM MBUSA:
2013 C63 AMG ... 5.5-liter biturbo V-8; Transmission: 7-speed AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT automatic; Performance: 518 hp, 516 lb-ft, 0 to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds
The trans in the new CLA45 will be better than the current offerings in the 2013 models across the line. The w205/ new S class, etc. will likely use the 7 speed DCT
Only one thing though, the CLA is not larger than the current C-Class, it is actually smaller inside, especially in the back seat.
M
FROM MBUSA:
2013 C63 AMG ... 5.5-liter biturbo V-8; Transmission: 7-speed AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT automatic; Performance: 518 hp, 516 lb-ft, 0 to 60 mph in 4.2 seconds
The trans in the new CLA45 will be better than the current offerings in the 2013 models across the line. The w205/ new S class, etc. will likely use the 7 speed DCT
See above. However i read the C Class transmission will be made by ZF as opposed to a in house unit. Maybe they will make a stick shift for the new C63? ZF has built some pretty tough trannys before for some hardcore performance models.
CLA-Class:
Width 1,777 mm (70.0 in)
Height 1,437 mm (56.6 in)
Width 1,770 mm (69.7 in)
Height 1,447 mm (57.0 in)
Width 1,795 mm (70.7 in)
Height 1,447 mm (57.0 in)
Having previously owned an Evo, I was really planning on moving to a 6 or 8 cyl...but this car is definitely tempting.
Btw for anyone considering it, the car is extremely small inside (way smaller than a W204 inside), and feels a little cheap (but still nicer than evos n stis), but otherwise it was pretty nice.





