CLA 45 AMG (C117) 2013 to 2018

First dyno. 340 WHP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old 07-11-2013, 11:35 AM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
My daily is an SRT-4, and it runs 16-17lbs peak. (Stage 1 PCM) Now talks of potential 35psi on a stock turbo, insane.

I hope the aftermarket really takes off on this car. Does anyone know what size the turbo is, or make and model?

Can't seem to find it anywhere.

Last edited by Nachtsturm; 07-11-2013 at 11:38 AM.
Old 07-11-2013, 12:43 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
T.H.Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 685
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
2012 w221
its a borgwagner I believe.
Old 07-11-2013, 05:24 PM
  #28  
Super Member
 
ML63 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 963
Received 58 Likes on 43 Posts
CL63 AMG
Originally Posted by csexty3
Coming from 2 Evos and an STi ... I wonder how much turbo lag the CLA has. Need to see a torque curve vs. RPM dyno graph.

I personally could not stand my Evo/Sti's in hot weather with the AC blasting...the cars just had zero grunt off the line and felt like they lost 200whp lol. The more power you make on a 2.0 the more lag you get, naturally, but I wonder if and how AMG has possibly alleviated this.
It's a twin scroll (similar to twin turbo) so the lag will be greatly reduced versus a standard large single turbo.
Old 07-12-2013, 12:21 AM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by Hotsoss
Just out of curiosity what is the highest rwhp that Evo 9s, 10s, and even the STIs achieve on the stock turbos? I know this is an entirely new engine, but these were the epitome for 4 cylinder turbo engines prior to the new motor from AMG.
Well into the mid 400whp on the Evo 8 and 9s. The STIs are under 400 on the stock turbo. Again, we are talking AWD to the wheels here.
.
Old 07-12-2013, 12:24 AM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by ML63 AMG
It's a twin scroll (similar to twin turbo) so the lag will be greatly reduced versus a standard large single turbo.
Two different concepts and far apart. The twin scroll is just the input shape or the turbo from the exhaust manifold, the twin scroll is a twin intake vs a a regular single intake.

The twin scroll suppose to give you the advantage of accepting the air from two cylinders at a different pulse thus enhancing spool characteristic. The single scroll is just all 4 cylinders putting air on the opening and interfering a little bit on the flow.
Old 07-12-2013, 12:29 AM
  #31  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
Originally Posted by PurpleHeartAMG
With a 2 liter engine and a turbo already pushing supposedly 26lbs of boost I doubt there is much wiggle room in the tuning world.

Depending on internals, I'm picture a lot of people upgrading to bigger turbos, larger fueling/intake capacity, and if need be the internals themselves to get a lot more power out of these. I don't even want to think about what that would cost.

Needless to say, great numbers for a stock car but I just don't see much improvement without changing out major components.
I concur with you. At 26PSI already from factory that is pushing it. It probably has the latest on turbo technology like twin scroll , ball bearing and hopefully a HTA compressor wheel and some high PSI waste gate actuator from Factory but I just see a power limit already. I think that they squeezed as much as they could keeping in mind the drivebility and reliability. Injectors would be super expensive for this set up specially because the engine has direct injections and the PSI is probably above 2200psi. Same goes for the fuel pump, VW fuel pumps are very pricey on the MKV GTI and MKVI GTIs. my ,2c
Old 07-12-2013, 09:28 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
Good points C63newdude.

Here is an interesting read I came accross this morning: http://***********.com/content.php?3...AMG-dyno-graph
Old 07-12-2013, 03:52 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C63newdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
C63 AMG
^^^Thanks for the link, I saw this video about two weeks ago and I liked it. The couple of things that I don't like is the 100%FWD to 50-50% traction. In real hard driving situations accelerating from a dead stop you want more like 65% rear and 35% front or even 70% rear-30 front. I am saying this from owing 12 AWD cars (4 Evos, one STI, one WRX, 2 VR4s, one Carrera 4 and 4 DSMs).

Another thing that doesn't convince me is the watercooler intercooler. It seems like the water cooled intercooler"suppose" to offer better cooling than the air to air but a good FMIC with a decent size and shape does the job very well. Just thinking about having this hot water trying to cool a core doesn't make much sense to me, ironically I currently drive a car that comes from factory with a water cooled intercooler (or heat exchanger), this is a Passat TDI.

Last edited by C63newdude; 07-12-2013 at 04:00 PM.
Old 07-12-2013, 04:10 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
The couple of things that I don't like is the 100%FWD to 50-50% traction.
Yeah, I was a little surprised that AMG would do that. I think this might be due to the fact that this is a front wheel biased vehicle. Could that be a factor? It'll be interesting to see if the CLA45 has the same distribution.
Old 07-12-2013, 04:13 PM
  #35  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ghiaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,155
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
C55 AMG, 300D-T & Karmann Ghia
Originally Posted by Hotsoss
I think this might be due to the fact that this is a front wheel biased vehicle. Could that be a factor? It'll be interesting to see if the CLA45 has the same distribution.
That is exactly why. The CLA will be the same, I can't help but see this as a let down due to cost savings. Who can blame them though, they needed to work off the base CLA and not totally reinvent the wheel.
Old 07-12-2013, 05:09 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
I would still seriously consider the CLA along with the upcoming ATS-V, and maybe RS3 if I was in the market for a smaller more fuel efficient vehicle in future. I really like this car styling and it has real world performance. It'll run with just about anything you will encounter on the road from 0-80mph and with a few mods run neck and neck or faster than C63s
Old 07-13-2013, 12:15 PM
  #37  
Newbie
 
Bimbpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55
Originally Posted by Hotsoss
Good points C63newdude.

Here is an interesting read I came accross this morning: http://***********.com/content.php?3...AMG-dyno-graph
Perfectly fitting, thanks for sharing!
Old 08-07-2013, 12:44 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by T.H.Carrera
its a borgwagner I believe.
Found the actual model turbo.

Twin-scroll BorgWarner B03 turbocharger
Old 08-07-2013, 01:07 PM
  #39  
Member
 
Rafiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: CHICAGO, IL
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2016 AMG GTS
It's a 4 banger at the end of the day, unless major upgrades are being hanged I don't see more than 40~50 being squeezed out from it, the engine is already been pushed to its max by AMG
Old 08-07-2013, 01:29 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
In this month's Motortrend article for the CLA45 the reviewer is say that this is the best I-4 motor he's ever driven. He says the power is very linear like a N/A and the torque is immediate. Hey if the aftermarket can make this car accelerate faster than a M135i which is a beast when tuned then the CLA45 will be a force to be reckonned with once second hand buyers get there hands on one with no real concern about factory warranty.
Old 08-07-2013, 01:32 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by Rafiki
It's a 4 banger at the end of the day, unless major upgrades are being hanged I don't see more than 40~50 being squeezed out from it, the engine is already been pushed to its max by AMG
LOL. Maybe on stock turbo this will be true. Depends if the aftermarket takes off. Direct bolt on turbo kits I do not consider major upgrades. The block is sandcasted w/ a closed deck, and the whole bottom end is forged.

Let's look at another FI 4 cylinder car with strong internals.

A stock srt-4 dyno's around 230whp, 300whp can be extracted with bolt ons and tune. Granted a stock srt-4 doesn't push 26.1psi stock, circa 14-15 peak.

Turbo swapped srt-4 50 trims make 400+whp, This can be done relatively cheap, even the 50trim can run on stock internals.

While GT35 turbo srt-4's have broken the 500+whp mark. Others are even higher. Red Sled comes to mind.

Do not discount a car just because it is a 4 cylinder. This isn't 1970. That turbo 4 stock is dynoing similar to what my modified M113 V8 can muster.
Old 08-07-2013, 03:28 PM
  #42  
Member
 
Rafiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: CHICAGO, IL
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2016 AMG GTS
Originally Posted by Nachtsturm
LOL. Maybe on stock turbo this will be true. Depends if the aftermarket takes off. Direct bolt on turbo kits I do not consider major upgrades. The block is sandcasted w/ a closed deck, and the whole bottom end is forged.

Let's look at another FI 4 cylinder car with strong internals.

A stock srt-4 dyno's around 230whp, 300whp can be extracted with bolt ons and tune. Granted a stock srt-4 doesn't push 26.1psi stock, circa 14-15 peak.

Turbo swapped srt-4 50 trims make 400+whp, This can be done relatively cheap, even the 50trim can run on stock internals.

While GT35 turbo srt-4's have broken the 500+whp mark. Others are even higher. Red Sled comes to mind.

Do not discount a car just because it is a 4 cylinder. This isn't 1970. That turbo 4 stock is dynoing similar to what my modified M113 V8 can muster.
Not in anyway discounting the car because it's a 4, but how many of those SRT4s end up with blown engines at the end of the day, or rather can those with 500whp on their neons run that same setup for two years, if the money is there you can even get a smart fortwo to put down monster numbers, it's how long those set up can last for , now that's the trick
Old 08-08-2013, 02:01 AM
  #43  
Super Member
 
ML63 AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 963
Received 58 Likes on 43 Posts
CL63 AMG
Interesting... The new BMW N55 turbo engine also uses the twin scroll Borg Warner B03 turbo (albeit with weaker internals).

I think 400whp for fully maxed out (including all possible bolt ons) is the absolute max you would push it. The real question is, how much can the DCT and PTU in the transmission handle. The PTU that sends power rearward is a very small unit, I would be shocked if it can handle more than 400whp with launch control.
Old 08-08-2013, 09:16 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
Hotsoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Morristown, NJ and Philly
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Current: Cadillac CTS-V (V2), Chevy Cruze Past: E55k
The real question is, how much can the DCT and PTU in the transmission handle.
Good point.
Old 08-12-2013, 06:24 PM
  #45  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nachtsturm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2015.5 Volvo V60 Polestar
Originally Posted by Rafiki
Not in anyway discounting the car because it's a 4, but how many of those SRT4s end up with blown engines at the end of the day, or rather can those with 500whp on their neons run that same setup for two years, if the money is there you can even get a smart fortwo to put down monster numbers, it's how long those set up can last for , now that's the trick
I know over several stage 3(330-380whp) cars personally that are still doing fine today. 6-7 years maybe longer. Maybe not on the original clutch. But original engine for sure. Also know of a couple 50 trims that are still doing great as well. I personally don't know anyone with a 500whp SRT-4. I am sure you can still find them on the SRT-4 forum. Do some of them blow engines, sure. Bound to happen when pushing the envelope or trying to out smart the tuner. The CLA45 will be no different. The internals are there, now we just need the aftermarket.

I personally think a CLA45 with a hybrid turbo setup (similar to N54 setup) with supporting mods will have no problem engine wise. I am more curious to see how the transmission will hold as others have said. Then again Mercedes is not known for its strong aftermarket. So, only time will tell.
Old 08-13-2013, 06:30 PM
  #46  
Super Member
 
EVOII_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 981
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Mercedes Evo II
The a45 is sick car really! I am rarely impressed but It's an insane machine amg and Mb managed to make! i drove one a go-kart typed racetrack and It's just perfect imo ! so precise, idiot proof, very quick and so so much fun to slide

Never experienced turbo lag unlike in the sl 500 i test drove before on the road... Imo the only issue with the a45 is that it sucks without the performance exhaust
Old 08-13-2013, 09:23 PM
  #47  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MBfinatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: VA
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
e36 318i, 2004 sti
Thats amazing! Wonder how much power they could make using alcohol injection.
Old 08-23-2013, 09:21 AM
  #48  
Super Member
 
dav461's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Russia
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
GTR
Originally Posted by EVOII_Racer
Imo the only issue with the a45 is that it sucks without the performance exhaust
This is good point
No point to order it without this option..sound is completely different.
Old 08-29-2013, 08:56 AM
  #49  
Junior Member
 
Exekious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rafiki
Not in anyway discounting the car because it's a 4, but how many of those SRT4s end up with blown engines at the end of the day, or rather can those with 500whp on their neons run that same setup for two years, if the money is there you can even get a smart fortwo to put down monster numbers, it's how long those set up can last for , now that's the trick
It will all depend on how the engine is designed.

I think the aftermarket will really take to the CLA45. We are going to see lot's of high horsepower versions of this car. Tuners will figure out what the true limits of the car is. I would not make an assumption on the limits until it's been fully tested. I remember back in 2004 when I put HKS 272 cams in my Evo and had it tuned at 320whp that numerous people expected me to blow up my motor. Now most people know that Evos can take a lot more then that on the stock block.
Old 09-20-2013, 04:00 AM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Koru_Kinshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,276
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2018 E63S AMG, 2003 SLK 230 Sport, 2004 SL 600, 2006 SLK 55 AMG, 1998 E320 Wagon
Originally Posted by ML63 AMG
Interesting... The new BMW N55 turbo engine also uses the twin scroll Borg Warner B03 turbo (albeit with weaker internals).

I think 400whp for fully maxed out (including all possible bolt ons) is the absolute max you would push it. The real question is, how much can the DCT and PTU in the transmission handle. The PTU that sends power rearward is a very small unit, I would be shocked if it can handle more than 400whp with launch control.
So much for 400 whp max...

http://www.autoevolution.com/mercede...son-66810.html

That's a massive gain from just a tune. And to top that off, Carlsson is an authorized MB Tuner, so Mercedes will still honor the car's warranty with their parts on it.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: First dyno. 340 WHP



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 PM.