A class failed ( again ) Moose Test
04-04-2020, 03:29 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Poland
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
MB W177 A250 4Matic
A class failed ( again ) Moose Test
As on topic A class failed moose test
vs Old A Class
I blame tires ( got Bridgestone Turanza ER300 on previous car [ Seat Leon 5F } and they were awful... ) but i dont think this is all about tires
Freaking Skoda Scala is way way better...but it does have better tires which do not justify his good results
And yes moose test is real life test where there are different weight distribution on sudden change of lane than on tracks where ride is predictive, Those tests like "Oh lets put skoda on nurburgring and see who will be faster" are not real life, real danger which almost all could have on road.
To conclude this is not a only way to judge but tells a something to consider and rethink how it could happen
I blame tires ( got Bridgestone Turanza ER300 on previous car [ Seat Leon 5F } and they were awful... ) but i dont think this is all about tires
Freaking Skoda Scala is way way better...but it does have better tires which do not justify his good results
And yes moose test is real life test where there are different weight distribution on sudden change of lane than on tracks where ride is predictive, Those tests like "Oh lets put skoda on nurburgring and see who will be faster" are not real life, real danger which almost all could have on road.
To conclude this is not a only way to judge but tells a something to consider and rethink how it could happen
