CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Anybody remove their resonator only on CLK430?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #1  
blaCLK430's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
2002 CLK430, Black/Ash
Anybody remove their resonator only on CLK430?

If anybody has removed the resonator from their CLK 430, what is the sound like with the stock rear muffler only? Is their any loud resonance or noie at a certain RPM? Is the sound louder?
Thanks for any imput I am considering doing this to get a little better sound from the V8 that seems very quiet and muted. I am reluctant to spend on an aftermarket exhaust knowing that the HP gain will be miniml if at all.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #2  
E55AMG99's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 3
From: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
1951 Caterpiller D6
Makes the car louder under heavy throttle. I put mine back after a few months becasue it didn't sound "right" for the car/performance. Maybe I'm just getting too old
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2005 | 10:13 PM
  #3  
Bagher's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
1999 CLK430
i took mine out and put the clk55 amg exhaust in. not sure how different the two exhausts are but the car is defenitly deeper and rumble-ier. it is not loud and obnoxious especially if you are just cruising with your foot off the gas. It sounds almost like a refined muscle car.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 08:58 AM
  #4  
str8ridin's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,880
Likes: 9
From: Seattle
05 E55
I removed mine and the sound was not noticebly louder, however when cruising around slowly and when the car upshifts, you can notice a small rumble.

However, I might put it back on because my dyno numbers were kinda low...but it could be someting else.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 01:38 PM
  #5  
blaCLK430's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
2002 CLK430, Black/Ash
Thanks for the input

I guss I am still out on the fence on this, but I may just try it since it is so inexpensive. How can you lose HP by reducing backpressure? I guess you could lose some mid range torque, but top end should be better no?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 04:49 PM
  #6  
E55AMG99's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 3
From: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
1951 Caterpiller D6
HP drops CAN happen when reducing BP. Usually on lower to mid HP engines. The exhaust can be tuned like the intake by changing length, diameter, etc.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #7  
blaCLK430's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
2002 CLK430, Black/Ash
Did you notice a drop in HP or Torqu when you had the resonator out?
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #8  
E55AMG99's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 3
From: WOT somewhere in the Bay Area
1951 Caterpiller D6
My highly calibrated butt dyno couldn't feel the difference but my mind was saying it was quicker. Might have been because I was on he gas harder all the time to hear the sound. My guess is that if there is a gain, it is negligible. The benefit would be for the sound IMO
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #9  
blaCLK430's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
2002 CLK430, Black/Ash
Thanks, like I said I think I will try it, since it is easy and cheap to do it and if I don't like it to go back to the resonator.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:53 AM.