I just got the warning signal that I need brakes, the dealer has been bugging me for a while saying that the pads are too thin. One question I got is it neccesary to replace the rotors as well? The dealer doesn't seem to want to turn them. Are they trying to rip me off or is there a benefit to put new rotors in as well as pads, my clk has only 35,XXX miles on it. Any feedback appreciated.

 

Your car with 35K miles should not need rotors unless you have let the pads wear to the metal and have gouged the rotor. This is an easy do it yourself job....CAR 101 material.

 

Hi, Lupo.

You only need to replace the rotors if they are warped or otherwise damaged. If your car stops smoothly, no need to worry about them. Your dealer is being honest about not turning them: MBZ does not approve turning rotors, if they're warped, they spec replacement.

I did a step-by-step pictorial post re: the 210 and it's almost identical on the 208, the link is: https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w210/107227-okay-brake-job.html.

If you've done disc brakes on other cars, you won't find anything particularly challenging about the benz discs. Just don't forget to get new sensors -- especially once you've gotten the warning and they are very cheap -- and MBZ brake paste, one packet for each wheelset.

Take care and enjoy the ride,
Greg

 

Greg's stuff is the best of the web! Follow his link...it's an easy job...

 

Most (all?) MB dealers won't turn rotors. The rotors on CLK's and most newer Benz's are soft by design to improve "grab" and thus wear out faster. I went through this same thing at 35K and replaced mine with Brembo cross drilled rotors and Axxis Deluxe pads. I also took the opportunity to cadmium coat my rotors so they don't rust. Cost an extra $150 bucks but keeps 'em looking sweet since you can seem them through the wheels. Good luck.