KBB value for CLK wrong?
11-14-2006, 10:33 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'00 CLK430 & '08 Lexus RX 350
VERY INTERESTING....& HE's RIGHT!
I just gave identical options and mileage and sure enough across the board (Excellent, Good & Fair conditions) the '99 CLK 430 Private Party value lists higher.
Private Party
1999 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $19,890
Good - $18,850
Fair - $17,365
2000 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $18,270
Good - $17,220
Fair - $15,810
Sug. Retail
1999 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $23,525
2000 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $21,590
What gives KBB?
Private Party
1999 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $19,890
Good - $18,850
Fair - $17,365
2000 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $18,270
Good - $17,220
Fair - $15,810
Sug. Retail
1999 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $23,525
2000 - CLK430 (w/63,xxx)
Excellent - $21,590
What gives KBB?
Last edited by MMM430; 11-14-2006 at 10:36 PM.
11-14-2006, 11:11 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'00 CLK430 & '08 Lexus RX 350
Edmunds.com
seems to think along more traditional lines of common sence and depreciated value than does KBB.
Wonder how many people have sold their vehicles far lower than KBB b/c of a possible error?! Just goes to show...DO YOUR HOMEWORK!!
2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK430 Coupe
Trade-In / Private Party / Dealer Retail
National Base Price - $15,013 / $16,741 / $18,435
Loaded (options/mileage) - $17,099 / $19,034 / $21,139
VS.
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK430 Coupe
Trade-In / Private Party / Dealer Retail
National Base Price - $12,470 / $14,105 / $15,806
Loaded (options/mileage) - $14,376 / $16,184 / $18,215
Wonder how many people have sold their vehicles far lower than KBB b/c of a possible error?! Just goes to show...DO YOUR HOMEWORK!!2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK430 Coupe
Trade-In / Private Party / Dealer Retail
National Base Price - $15,013 / $16,741 / $18,435
Loaded (options/mileage) - $17,099 / $19,034 / $21,139
VS.
1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK-Class 2 Dr CLK430 Coupe
Trade-In / Private Party / Dealer Retail
National Base Price - $12,470 / $14,105 / $15,806
Loaded (options/mileage) - $14,376 / $16,184 / $18,215
11-14-2006, 11:56 PM
#5
Super Member
Yes KBB is correct. There were several changes in the 2000 model like the touch shift tranny, and other changes that dropped the value. (Ironic, I know) However by 2001, the two year gap was too hard to ignore and the '01's became more valuable. The Black Book says the same. (99 over 00)
Edmunds couldn't price a bag of fruit.
Edmunds couldn't price a bag of fruit.
Trending Topics
11-15-2006, 01:38 PM
#8
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2016 C450 AMG
I definately think something is wrong with KBB. Why would touchshift decrease value? If anything it would add value...as far as I know there were no new options added to a 2000 CLK that would reduce value (its not like they have I-drive).... 2000 CLK has the blue tint glass, turn indicators on the side mirrors, touchshift, black walnut wood, steering wheel controls...etc. Whats so freakin bad??
11-15-2006, 02:20 PM
#10
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK 430 Coupe
I don't know how true it is or if it would be relevant or not, but one of my mechanics had told me that there seemed to be more issues with the '00 models from his experience.
