CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

320 to a 430/55. Differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-10-2007, 11:51 PM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
DENNIStheMENACE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Torrance
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99 CLK320
320 to a 430/55. Differences?

I have a 99 clk320 and I was thinking of trading up to a w208 430/55. What effects will this have on my insurance as im still a student trying to scrape by lol. Also is gas mileage really different between a 430 to a 55. What about gas mileage between a 320 to a 430/55. Is it lower or dramatically lower?
Old 06-11-2007, 12:07 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
The Jury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TN
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 c240
You likely cannot afford the insurance on the 55, the 430 is not too bad. Each step is a pretty good step. The 430 is a nice piece of power compared to the 320, the 55 is that much better.
Old 06-11-2007, 07:50 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts
AMG
Your insurance rate will differ greatly based on your location, age and driving record. Mine runs $1100/year for 300/300 and a 500 ded.

Fuel mileage EPA estimates for the 55 are 17/24 and I usually see 20/27.

Last edited by Chappy; 06-11-2007 at 07:52 AM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 320 to a 430/55. Differences?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.