CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

320 to a 430/55. Differences?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2007 | 11:51 PM
  #1  
DENNIStheMENACE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Torrance
99 CLK320
320 to a 430/55. Differences?

I have a 99 clk320 and I was thinking of trading up to a w208 430/55. What effects will this have on my insurance as im still a student trying to scrape by lol. Also is gas mileage really different between a 430 to a 55. What about gas mileage between a 320 to a 430/55. Is it lower or dramatically lower?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 12:07 AM
  #2  
The Jury's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 5
From: TN
2002 c240
You likely cannot afford the insurance on the 55, the 430 is not too bad. Each step is a pretty good step. The 430 is a nice piece of power compared to the 320, the 55 is that much better.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2007 | 07:50 AM
  #3  
Chappy's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,734
Likes: 65
From: Hotlanta
AMG
Your insurance rate will differ greatly based on your location, age and driving record. Mine runs $1100/year for 300/300 and a 500 ded.

Fuel mileage EPA estimates for the 55 are 17/24 and I usually see 20/27.

Last edited by Chappy; Jun 11, 2007 at 07:52 AM.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 PM.