Test drove CLK 430 and M3 back to back
06-25-2003, 09:38 PM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: FLUSHING, NY
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2006 E350
I'm not sure if you'd like them but the Carlsson 2/5 looks great on the CLK or any Mercedes for that matter. I'm attaching a pic below.
I really love the Monoblock look on the CLK. I am looking for a set of 18" Chrome for my 430.
If you decide to sell yours after you purchase rims, post them in the classified section.
I really love the Monoblock look on the CLK. I am looking for a set of 18" Chrome for my 430.
If you decide to sell yours after you purchase rims, post them in the classified section.
06-25-2003, 09:57 PM
#27
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK 55
Thanks Eleni
Those are right up the alley of what I am looking for. I am going to research the price etc.
BTW: I will be taking pictures this weekend. I will be sure to post some.
I welcome any other recommendations. I want to have as many options as possible.
BTW: I will be taking pictures this weekend. I will be sure to post some.
I welcome any other recommendations. I want to have as many options as possible.
07-01-2003, 12:54 AM
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston, MA and Hong Kong
Posts: 4,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E350, S320, Mini Cooper S
Re: Thanks Eleni
Originally posted by Dely
Those are right up the alley of what I am looking for. I am going to research the price etc.
BTW: I will be taking pictures this weekend. I will be sure to post some.
I welcome any other recommendations. I want to have as many options as possible.
Those are right up the alley of what I am looking for. I am going to research the price etc.
BTW: I will be taking pictures this weekend. I will be sure to post some.
I welcome any other recommendations. I want to have as many options as possible.
07-01-2003, 07:46 PM
#29
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Read sig
Re: Test drove CLK 430 and M3 back to back
Originally posted by Dely
Hello again folks,
I had a E-36 M3 for 6 years which I loved. I have also been driving BMW for 10 years. To say I am biased would be an understatement. I only decided to look at the CLK 430 after the M3 engine troubles.
Now for the good stuff.
A salesperson I have been working with at my local Mercedes dealership called me to let me know he had a 2001 CLK 430 that just came in. I informed him that I had changed my mind and I was going to get another M3. I decided to check the car out anyway out of courtesy.
I went down and saw the car. BEAUTIFUL! It was black with gray leather interior and a slight light blue tint that accentuates the interior. Love the performance. Took it up to 120 and thought I was doing 80.
We got back to the dealership and I told him I loved the car, but I can't get over the non-stick factor and I was going to go with the M.
This dealership has a BMW branch across the street. He suggested since I just drove the CLK why don't I go across the street and drive the M3 and see how I feel after. Prior to this I have never driven the E-46 M3.
WELL I DID and I like the CLK better.
Speed
M3 wins. The car is faster, but you have to WIND that engine to get the optimal torque range of 5-8 RPMS
Engine Sound
CLK all the way. The 8 cylinder sounds a smooth as butter. So sweeeeeeet. The M has a high winding sound that can be annoying at times.
Torque
CLK wins and in some ways the car feels faster than the M3 because of this. I know the M is faster, but the torque makes the CLK feel like a contender.
Interior.
CLK hands down. The car just looks classy inside and feels rich. The M has a nice interior, but the CLK will make the ladies go OOOOOH.
Exterior
CLK wins. I know this purely personal opinion, but the w208 CLK is one of the best looking cars out there. The M is nice looking, but the commonality of the 3 series minimizes the looks somewhat. The W208 CLK still maintains that Mystique even after 7 years on the market.
Stereo
If you need to ask then you have never heard the stereo in both cars. People complain about the Bose in the CLK, but the HK system SUCKS.
Appeal factor
The dealerships are on a street where they had a concert tonight and I had to drive both cars by a crowd of people. The CLK wins hand down. There was a lot more people drooling over the CLK. It didn't hurt that I saw much more ladies drooling over the CLK. The M drew some looks, but mostly after some guys saw the quad exhaust (distinguishing factor).
You now have a new convert. I WILL be buying a CLK for my next car. Bye bye M.
I am going to sleep on it because I am still trying to decide between the CLK430 and the CLK55. I have never driven a CLK55, but if it is much faster, DAMN DAMN DAMN
Is the 5-7K difference worth it?
Sorry for the ranting. I am just excited.
Hello again folks,
I had a E-36 M3 for 6 years which I loved. I have also been driving BMW for 10 years. To say I am biased would be an understatement. I only decided to look at the CLK 430 after the M3 engine troubles.
Now for the good stuff.
A salesperson I have been working with at my local Mercedes dealership called me to let me know he had a 2001 CLK 430 that just came in. I informed him that I had changed my mind and I was going to get another M3. I decided to check the car out anyway out of courtesy.
I went down and saw the car. BEAUTIFUL! It was black with gray leather interior and a slight light blue tint that accentuates the interior. Love the performance. Took it up to 120 and thought I was doing 80.
We got back to the dealership and I told him I loved the car, but I can't get over the non-stick factor and I was going to go with the M.
This dealership has a BMW branch across the street. He suggested since I just drove the CLK why don't I go across the street and drive the M3 and see how I feel after. Prior to this I have never driven the E-46 M3.
WELL I DID and I like the CLK better.
Speed
M3 wins. The car is faster, but you have to WIND that engine to get the optimal torque range of 5-8 RPMS
Engine Sound
CLK all the way. The 8 cylinder sounds a smooth as butter. So sweeeeeeet. The M has a high winding sound that can be annoying at times.
Torque
CLK wins and in some ways the car feels faster than the M3 because of this. I know the M is faster, but the torque makes the CLK feel like a contender.
Interior.
CLK hands down. The car just looks classy inside and feels rich. The M has a nice interior, but the CLK will make the ladies go OOOOOH.
Exterior
CLK wins. I know this purely personal opinion, but the w208 CLK is one of the best looking cars out there. The M is nice looking, but the commonality of the 3 series minimizes the looks somewhat. The W208 CLK still maintains that Mystique even after 7 years on the market.
Stereo
If you need to ask then you have never heard the stereo in both cars. People complain about the Bose in the CLK, but the HK system SUCKS.
Appeal factor
The dealerships are on a street where they had a concert tonight and I had to drive both cars by a crowd of people. The CLK wins hand down. There was a lot more people drooling over the CLK. It didn't hurt that I saw much more ladies drooling over the CLK. The M drew some looks, but mostly after some guys saw the quad exhaust (distinguishing factor).
You now have a new convert. I WILL be buying a CLK for my next car. Bye bye M.
I am going to sleep on it because I am still trying to decide between the CLK430 and the CLK55. I have never driven a CLK55, but if it is much faster, DAMN DAMN DAMN
Is the 5-7K difference worth it?
Sorry for the ranting. I am just excited.
07-01-2003, 08:23 PM
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Re: Test drove CLK 430 and M3 back to back
Originally posted by PiNoYBaLLeR
of course the MB wins because it was posted here on mbworld.some of you guys hate bimmers so of course you'll put them down.....
of course the MB wins because it was posted here on mbworld.some of you guys hate bimmers so of course you'll put them down.....
-Bruce
07-03-2003, 02:04 AM
#31
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Read sig
Re: Re: Re: Test drove CLK 430 and M3 back to back
Originally posted by LowRydeR
That's very true, if the same question was posted on BMW forums the replies would favorite the M3. Personally I would take the M3, its fast and the price is very reasonable, a little too many of them on the street in Cali though.
-Bruce
That's very true, if the same question was posted on BMW forums the replies would favorite the M3. Personally I would take the M3, its fast and the price is very reasonable, a little too many of them on the street in Cali though.
-Bruce
07-03-2003, 02:26 AM
#32
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston, MA and Hong Kong
Posts: 4,842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E350, S320, Mini Cooper S
Re: Re: Re: Test drove CLK 430 and M3 back to back
Originally posted by LowRydeR
That's very true, if the same question was posted on BMW forums the replies would favorite the M3. Personally I would take the M3, its fast and the price is very reasonable, a little too many of them on the street in Cali though.
-Bruce
That's very true, if the same question was posted on BMW forums the replies would favorite the M3. Personally I would take the M3, its fast and the price is very reasonable, a little too many of them on the street in Cali though.
-Bruce
07-03-2003, 03:06 AM
#33
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Re: Re: Re: Test drove CLK 430 and M3 back to back
Originally posted by LowRydeR
That's very true, if the same question was posted on BMW forums the replies would favorite the M3. Personally I would take the M3, its fast and the price is very reasonable, a little too many of them on the street in Cali though.
-Bruce
That's very true, if the same question was posted on BMW forums the replies would favorite the M3. Personally I would take the M3, its fast and the price is very reasonable, a little too many of them on the street in Cali though.
-Bruce
07-03-2003, 09:35 AM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: FLUSHING, NY
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2006 E350
I definitely have to agree with FrankW on the S4. It is definitely the most reasonably priced German car for its power. We had an S4 that we just sold and while I wasn't too crazy on how similar the body was to an A4 the power was up there and it was a fun car to drive. And I must say the style of the interior and console beat the Mercedes and BMW unless you have the command and navigation system in your benz.
But given all of that, I still would never trade my CLK for an S4 or an M3 for that matter.
But given all of that, I still would never trade my CLK for an S4 or an M3 for that matter.
07-03-2003, 11:53 AM
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
As a previous S4 Owner...
I had a 2001 S4 that I bought in Sept 2000. I drove it for over 50,000 miles and modded it with the basics (Oettinger Exhaust, ABT Filter, Eibach suspension kit and 18" BBS RXII wheels). It was a 6-speed.
The car was great, had all the cool technical features, but lacked character and guts. The CLK 430 has much more character is more well-balanced and has MUCH BETTER Top-end pull.
The small turbos on the S4 seemed to ALWAYS run out of steam at 80 mph, 5K RPM. The V8 430 has a lot more top-end pull and I love it!
I don't miss my S4. It was a great car, I got it when there weren't as many punks driving Audis and VWs and it was very unique. However, Mercedes is just in a different league. I don't get jack@sses in A4s and GTIs revving me all the time and I have access to tuners such as Lorinser, Brabus, Kleemann and Carlsson to name a few.
Just my $.02
The car was great, had all the cool technical features, but lacked character and guts. The CLK 430 has much more character is more well-balanced and has MUCH BETTER Top-end pull.
The small turbos on the S4 seemed to ALWAYS run out of steam at 80 mph, 5K RPM. The V8 430 has a lot more top-end pull and I love it!
I don't miss my S4. It was a great car, I got it when there weren't as many punks driving Audis and VWs and it was very unique. However, Mercedes is just in a different league. I don't get jack@sses in A4s and GTIs revving me all the time and I have access to tuners such as Lorinser, Brabus, Kleemann and Carlsson to name a few.
Just my $.02
07-03-2003, 09:45 PM
#36
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by ELENI
I definitely have to agree with FrankW on the S4. It is definitely the most reasonably priced German car for its power. We had an S4 that we just sold and while I wasn't too crazy on how similar the body was to an A4 the power was up there and it was a fun car to drive. And I must say the style of the interior and console beat the Mercedes and BMW unless you have the command and navigation system in your benz.
But given all of that, I still would never trade my CLK for an S4 or an M3 for that matter.
I definitely have to agree with FrankW on the S4. It is definitely the most reasonably priced German car for its power. We had an S4 that we just sold and while I wasn't too crazy on how similar the body was to an A4 the power was up there and it was a fun car to drive. And I must say the style of the interior and console beat the Mercedes and BMW unless you have the command and navigation system in your benz.
But given all of that, I still would never trade my CLK for an S4 or an M3 for that matter.
07-03-2003, 10:49 PM
#37
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2001 CLK430
My last car was an 01 S4, 6 speed with an APR chip. With the chip that car was VERY fast, but IMO lacked character. I agree with ELENI that it looks just too much like the A4. The interior was very nice, but I still prefer the 430's.
The ONLY thing I miss about the S4 is the Audi community. My neighbor has a K04 modded S4 and we attended Audi GTG's often. There are also lots more tuners and the prices are more reasonable....
The ONLY thing I miss about the S4 is the Audi community. My neighbor has a K04 modded S4 and we attended Audi GTG's often. There are also lots more tuners and the prices are more reasonable....
07-04-2003, 04:29 AM
#38
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No longer car shopping...
Dely - If your still in the market mine is avail
Dely - Noticed you may be looking for a CLK55 for around what I am willing to sell mine for. I've PM'd you so take a look and give me a call if your interested.
07-17-2004, 06:38 PM
#39
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK, all the way!
I've owned an M3 and a CLK and here's my two cents...
I've always felt like the quality of Mercedes' was better than the BMW's... that said, sadly, I don't know if that is the case any more.
The reason I like the CLK more is that it is a more comfortable, less punishing car to live with. The M3 is an amazing car, but, it lacks the "grand touring" nature of the CLK which seems to me to be the perfect combination of sport and comfort.
I've always felt like the quality of Mercedes' was better than the BMW's... that said, sadly, I don't know if that is the case any more.
The reason I like the CLK more is that it is a more comfortable, less punishing car to live with. The M3 is an amazing car, but, it lacks the "grand touring" nature of the CLK which seems to me to be the perfect combination of sport and comfort.
07-19-2004, 01:32 PM
#40
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EFF YOU JACKIE
Quick question, what did you think about the handling of both? Body lean / roll, hard braking, etc., since you drove them back to back. I totally agree that the MBZ (208) is a classy, desireable design compared to the E46. No doubt it is a looker.
BTW - Well put Joesclk430cab. Well put.
BTW - Well put Joesclk430cab. Well put.
Last edited by ldangeli; 07-19-2004 at 01:41 PM.
07-19-2004, 01:38 PM
#41
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EFF YOU JACKIE
Originally Posted by ELENI
I definitely have to agree with FrankW on the S4. It is definitely the most reasonably priced German car for its power. We had an S4 that we just sold and while I wasn't too crazy on how similar the body was to an A4 the power was up there and it was a fun car to drive. And I must say the style of the interior and console beat the Mercedes and BMW unless you have the command and navigation system in your benz.
But given all of that, I still would never trade my CLK for an S4 or an M3 for that matter.
But given all of that, I still would never trade my CLK for an S4 or an M3 for that matter.
07-19-2004, 08:33 PM
#42
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Handling Comparison-
To me, the CLK dosen't feel really "balanced" when pushed hard. It feels front heavy to me. Almost like a "plowing" sensation. The M3 feels more balanced when pushed. That said, the CLK has an enormous amount of grip and very little body roll. It'll get you there when you are on it, but at nine-tenths for me is is way less satisfying to drive.
The reason I drive a CLK is that it is way more enjoyable to me to drive at one-tenths, two-tenths, three-tenths, etc.
Also, the CLK 430 (I'm a sucker for the body work on the 430) cabriolet is absolutely one of the most beautiful automobiles on earth. Especially in black!
The reason I drive a CLK is that it is way more enjoyable to me to drive at one-tenths, two-tenths, three-tenths, etc.
Also, the CLK 430 (I'm a sucker for the body work on the 430) cabriolet is absolutely one of the most beautiful automobiles on earth. Especially in black!
07-19-2004, 10:23 PM
#43
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EFF YOU JACKIE
It's funny you say that. I feel the same way. But that is a matter of opinion I guess. I have argued this point many a times, and all I can say is I drive everyone of my cars as hard as I can and the MBZ is the only one that has gone through 3 sets of front's and 1 set of rears. Strange to me.. Granted you can't rotate the tires like other cars, but I haven't been able to do that since I started driving higher end german cars. It has always felt like the MBZ slides or pushes through the turns. Great example is it was once asked on this forum why at slow speeds the front end of the clk tends to hop or vibrate through turns. I have always wondered that myself.
:p
:p
11-29-2004, 01:05 AM
#44
Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLK 430
I donno, I like both. As long as they look good and perform to my satisfaction, I'll do either. (get your minds out of the gutter, I was talking about the cars) (haHa)
-Manyoohoo
-Manyoohoo
05-16-2008, 08:51 PM
#45
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
99 CLK 430
CLK 430 higher mileage
I have a higher mile 99 clk 430 and it has been a real headturner. I love the way it looks and its aggresive yet classy stance never gets old to me. My dilema is the miles on it.. I too was thinking of getting a 05 clk 500 or maybe a 04 m3. I can only afford one nice car in my family so since my wife will be driving it too I have to get an auto.....That's ok to me. My problem is I like the body style of the older clk and I really dont want to part with it, however do you all feel it would be the most logical thing to do because of the mileage/headaches that will certainly begin to happen any day. I don't like driving like a grandma just because Im afraid of something major happening to the car.....
05-17-2008, 10:04 AM
#48
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 CLK 350 Fog City, CA, USA
even 6 yrs old and counting....
... and what all has been said above is still TRUE today....
The Bimmer is like a quick roll in the Hay, a one night stand .. like a Hooke!!
The Mercedes is classy, the one you take home to Mom!
Also all the girls I've talked to said they prefer the Mercedes...
Don't know if it is true or not but heard that about 60% of BMW's are leased, which is maybe why there is so many of them running around... while the Mercedes are generally bought and owned.
The Bimmer is like a quick roll in the Hay, a one night stand .. like a Hooke!!
The Mercedes is classy, the one you take home to Mom!
Also all the girls I've talked to said they prefer the Mercedes...
Don't know if it is true or not but heard that about 60% of BMW's are leased, which is maybe why there is so many of them running around... while the Mercedes are generally bought and owned.
05-22-2008, 10:14 PM
#49
MBWorld Fanatic!
yeah i love my BENZ two of my good friends drive M3's and yeah there fun for the day driving hard, but as a daily they really suck try flooring it in the wrong gear on the highway and you go nowhere fast. i love my car but should have held for a 55! wow this is an old tread
