CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

CLK430 vs CLK 55

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-29-2004, 04:03 AM
  #1  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
vmsturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK430 vs CLK 55

Is it really that much more worth it to get a CLK430 and just get all the N/A out there or just go with a CLK55 from the start? And if each had a Kleemann S/C.
Old 03-29-2004, 10:42 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
hinhin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MB
Re: CLK430 vs CLK 55

Originally posted by vmsturbo
Is it really that much more worth it to get a CLK430 and just get all the N/A out there or just go with a CLK55 from the start? And if each had a Kleemann S/C.
If money isn't your concern, then, get CLK55 + Kleemann supercharger. :-)
Old 03-29-2004, 07:03 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Chappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 9,731
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
AMG
You need to drive both and then decide.
Old 03-29-2004, 11:15 PM
  #4  
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
 
vmsturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm guessing with all the suspension mods its more worth it to pay the extra dollars for the CLK55
Old 03-29-2004, 11:20 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Big Terry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Arlington,Texas
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2001 CLK 430 Silver
Your going to be happy with either one, They are both GREAT

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLK430 vs CLK 55



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.