CLK-Class (W208) 1998-2002: CLK 200, CLK 230K, CLK 320, CLK 430 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Grass is always greener eh?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-12-2005 | 04:17 PM
  #1  
Bouncer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
2001 CLK 320
Grass is always greener eh?

So... I am the happy owner of a 2001 CLK 320. Car is fine, upgraded the wheels from those crappy wagon wheel stock ones to AMG's (no I didn't rebadge or anything) and car works fine and so on and so forth.

Sigh.. how do I explain this. I want to upgrade. For about the same money (39k) I can get either a 2002 CLK 430 with all the options and 12K miles, OR a 2000 CL 500 with much higher mileage (closer to 60K).

Help me out here fellas. I know this is the w208 forum, but if you had that choice to make, which would you choose and why?

Please keep in mind that I have to be budget conscious, I make decent money but how some of you guys afford as much as you do at 20 something I'll never know.

Regards,
-Bouncer-
Old 02-12-2005 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
King320's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
03 C32 AMG
umm....no question here... go with the CL. Just make sure that you get good service records and make sure that the paint isnt all screwed up.
Old 02-12-2005 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
MeNmyCLK430's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
CLK 430
CL -- search long and hard, be patient and you'll find the right one.
Old 02-12-2005 | 08:33 PM
  #4  
brianw430's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
'11 S550 4Matic, '12 SL63 AMG, '13 ML350, '16 AMG GT-S Ed. 1,'03 Ford F-250
I feel the same way Bouncer. I have been looking for some time and am torn between the roomier CL and a CLK55. I have always liked the larger 2 door and looks/styling of the CL, but I also considered the maintenance costs. I believe the CLK would be lower, I could be wrong. Drive the CL and it will sell itself, I love that car. I also love the CLK, both incredible cars just different animals. You have a great opportunity to two very great/classy cars most will never realize.

The other consideration, which you may have already considered, is passengers. I am alone most of the time, so passenger roominess is not a concern.

My vote is certainly with the CL, beautiful car! Keep us posted on what you decide! I may wait another year for them to drop more in price.
Old 02-15-2005 | 05:02 AM
  #5  
3199cc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: NY
CLK320
Stay away from the CL. Even if you do have a warranty the car will spend many days in service due to the naturally complex nature of the CL class. I would say stay away from the earlier CL's especially and save your moeny for the next generation of cars.
Old 02-15-2005 | 06:44 PM
  #6  
rajah996's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,276
Likes: 14
From: Windermere, Sunny FLA
CLK55, CL500, Q45
I thought I was the only one thinking this. I am seriously considering
"upgrading" to an 01-02 CL500 with around 30-40k miles.
Old 02-15-2005 | 07:04 PM
  #7  
Chappy's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 9,731
Likes: 63
From: Hotlanta
AMG
Originally Posted by rajah996
I thought I was the only one thinking this. I am seriously considering
"upgrading" to an 01-02 CL500 with around 30-40k miles.
I've driven the CL500 many times. WONDERFUL car.....but you will miss the power if coming from an AMG.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Grass is always greener eh?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 AM.