CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

CLK350 vs. C350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-24-2010, 07:01 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
supacrazykev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLE 450 2021, SLK 350 2013, Honda Civc Type R 2019, Suzuki GSXR 750 2014, Ducati Diavel 2018
CLK350 vs. C350

I have a CLK350 '06 w/ 43k miles and C350 '09 w/ 6k miles. I was driving the cars both pretty hard today, and I noticed something interesting. Both cars have K&N air filters. I felt that CLK350 pulls faster. I was just wondering if anyone raced their CLK350 with a C350 before?
Old 04-24-2010, 12:17 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Supafly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I drive the racism out of BadDebt. ;)
CLK350----3560 lbs
C350 -----3527 lbs

Im going to say it has to do with the tuning....CLK is more sportive and the C350 is tuned for a more comfort ??
Old 04-24-2010, 05:44 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
supacrazykev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLE 450 2021, SLK 350 2013, Honda Civc Type R 2019, Suzuki GSXR 750 2014, Ducati Diavel 2018
Originally Posted by Supafly
CLK350----3560 lbs
C350 -----3527 lbs

Im going to say it has to do with the tuning....CLK is more sportive and the C350 is tuned for a more comfort ??
LoL i don't know either, but it's C350 sport package.
Old 04-27-2010, 07:38 AM
  #4  
Newbie
 
paulkris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 c350 2008 clk350
I'm interested in this thread. My wife has a 2008 C350. I recently bought a new, untitled, never sold CLK350. The CLK350 had 2000 miles on it when I bought it.
There is a huge difference in the cars. Her car is quicker off the mark and the brakes engage with very light pressure. The CLK is quick but you really need to put your foot in it to get it going. The brakes seem very mushy to me after her car. It stops okay but not on a dime. I've talked to the dealer about this and he assures me that they should be different. Both cars were compared in both the C and S modes.
Anyone have a similar experience?
Old 04-27-2010, 11:32 AM
  #5  
Member
 
michaelnovikov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLK
Originally Posted by paulkris
I'm interested in this thread. My wife has a 2008 C350. I recently bought a new, untitled, never sold CLK350. The CLK350 had 2000 miles on it when I bought it.
There is a huge difference in the cars. Her car is quicker off the mark and the brakes engage with very light pressure. The CLK is quick but you really need to put your foot in it to get it going. The brakes seem very mushy to me after her car. It stops okay but not on a dime. I've talked to the dealer about this and he assures me that they should be different. Both cars were compared in both the C and S modes.
Anyone have a similar experience?
The CLK original brakes are mushy and react slow compared to the C350 unfortunately. If you upgrade to Sports or AMG brakes, you will see a faster response and more stopping power.
Old 04-27-2010, 12:24 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
eddieo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Milton, MA USA
Posts: 2,960
Received 177 Likes on 147 Posts
me: 2015 SL400 & 2015 ML400; wife: 2022 GLC Coupe kid: 2017 GLC SUV
Originally Posted by Supafly
CLK350----3560 lbs
C350 -----3527 lbs

Im going to say it has to do with the tuning....CLK is more sportive and the C350 is tuned for a more comfort ??
Originally Posted by paulkris
....[wife's 2008 C350] is quicker off the mark and the brakes engage with very light pressure. The CLK350 is quick but you really need to put your foot in it to get it going. The brakes seem very mushy to me after her car. It stops okay but not on a dime. I've talked to the dealer about this and he assures me that they should be different. Both cars were compared in both the C and S modes.
Anyone have a similar experience?
I don't race at all but I agree with Paul, and not Supafly, with all due respect. I find my wife's C320 Sport far more sporty than my CLK, which seems more geared to comfort/luxury. Same with multiple W204 loaners I've had: all sportier than my CLK.
Old 04-27-2010, 08:27 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
supacrazykev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GLE 450 2021, SLK 350 2013, Honda Civc Type R 2019, Suzuki GSXR 750 2014, Ducati Diavel 2018
I can see what you guys are saying. The C350's pedal feel more responsive than the CLK350, but when manually shift the gears for both cars, It seems that my CLK has more torque pulling faster. Maybe it's because the C350 w/ 6k miles isn't really broken in yet. Maybe it's because I drive harder on the CLK more frequently than the C350, which the throttle response is adapted to my hard driving, but I reset the throttle response with both cars. In the end, I feel that my CLK feels faster than my C350. I'm pretty sure the two cars in general are darn close when it comes to a drag race w/ same engines and 40lb difference. When it comes to comparison other than speed, I like the styling of the exterior and interior of the CLK way more than the C. I only like C's headlights and the multimedia navi screen that pops up when car is on and pops down when car is off.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: CLK350 vs. C350



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:51 PM.