CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Sufficient the 200 kompressor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 25, 2003 | 05:02 PM
  #1  
Backroll's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Spain
chrysler Vision
Question Sufficient the 200 kompressor?

Are sufficient the 200 kompressor? I´m 23 years old and my budget does not arrive me for the 320 and I ask myself if 163 will be sufficient or be few for this car.

Thank you very much.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 09:22 PM
  #2  
MikeL's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
From: LA
Uber 202
i have a C230K.. its not a slouch.. but its not the best performer.. it meets all my need for a daily driver..
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2003 | 11:10 PM
  #3  
Mike T.'s Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
CLK 200

If I lived in Europe I'd get the CLK 200 CGI. It has more power and torque than the CLK 200 and far better fuel economy too.

Even 163 HP is adequate for that car I'd say. It's more than enough to accelerate to 100 in under 10 seconds and hit high speeds on the motorways...
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2003 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
CLK03's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
'73 LADA
200 CGI

Ive read a couple of test and evey test says the same.
the 200 cgi engine is better.



it'll cost around 40.000$
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 05:33 AM
  #5  
deslee's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: singapore
you won't regret buying one. gooooooooooooo for it. im happy with mine...........
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM.