CLK-Class (W209) 2003 on: CLK 270 CDI, CLK 200K, CLK 200 CGI, CLK 240, CLK 320, CLK 350, CLK 500, CLK 550 [Coupes & Cabriolets]

Tires Size vs Performance value

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 10:07 PM
  #1  
bheng's Avatar
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 3
From: SF
2003 CLK 320
Tires Size vs Performance value

http://www.caranddriver.com/features...d-tires-tested

Although this article is old, not about the mercedes, (and a given) but nonetheless a good read for those who want are/have considered a tire upgrade.

Question to those "plus sized wheels": do you notice a difference in actual mpg?

seems like when I was on my stock 16s, the extra 2mpg per tank would really add up but those wheels though...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 11:47 PM
  #2  
Rudeney's Avatar
MBworld Guru
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 10,782
Likes: 1,011
NO LONGER ACTIVE
Another thing to consider is that wider tires have less straight-line grip. Based on the overall outer diameter of the tire and the weight of the vehicle, there will be a uniformly sized contact patch. As the tire gets wider, the width of the contact patch increases so the longitudinal (i.e. front to rear) size of the contact patch gets smaller. This is good cor cornering grip, but bad for straight-line traction.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 AM.