Its quiet on here.
Oh and congrats on the purchase!
Power- the E55 is much more powerful. There is no way they make the 469hp mercedes claims, it must be closer to 500hp stock, there are plenty of 390-440whp dynos of stock cars, many in the 400-420 range. Torque is great in both, it is much greater in the E. It comes on slightly later in the E55 as the supercharger is not very efficient at very low rpm ie 1000rpm but by 1400rpm you are moving very quickly (same as with the old C32).
Cruising- in town the CLK55 is better for low rpm responsiveness which I put down entirely to the final gear ratio. 3.06 vs 2.82 for the E55 (if memory serves correctly). I found in the CLK55 you can gently put your foot down and go from 50km/hr to 60 with no gear change, no effort. The rpm is slightly too low to have the same response with the E55, at higher speeds and rpm it is not an issue any longer. The E55 purchase was an accident, I actually went to drive a 2010 E63 at a car yard but it was so harsh (much harsher than the KW coilovers), it bunny hops like learning to drive a manual with the cold MCT operation and it is gutless at cruising revs, you have to drop a gear to do what the other two cars can do otherwise the speed is only creeping up. I wrote off the E55 as being too old but I saw this one in the corner and asked for a test drive, only 21,000 miles and forgot about the E63 immediately.
Trending Topics
So true, if I had a garage I would start a Project for some fun.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG








