2001 CLK55 Wheel and Tires Question
I switched to the 18' Mono II's as well. I was told that you can use the factory lugs but Luke at Tire Rack offered me a new set for free anyways. I compared the threads and they are of exactly equal length. The head portion of the new bolts were longer which was the only difference.
I switch to 235front and 265rear with abosolutely no rubbing problems at all.
I am very pleased with my switch to 18' Mono as the rims have much more of a lip and the ride quality has not diminished.
I'm unloading some spares at the moment, but should have the setup installed soon.
Also, trying to decide between 255/35-18 and 265-35-18 for the rear. Any rubbing issues? Which should I go with?

I actually went even wider, with the 275/35's on the rear of mine (had previously done 265's)....no rubbing issues except one time, when I hit a really, really bad dip and got a small rub, but in every day driving, none.
Now, having said that, I must add a few caveats: I almost never have rear (or front, for that matter) passengers in my car, or heavy stuff in my trunk. So, ymmv...
I definitely wouldn't go with the 255's...even with the 275's, traction is still a serious issue, thanks in no small part to the FARGIN' ARSEHOLES at Mercedes Benz who were TOO CHEAP to put a limited slip on the car! And mark my words: I won't be buying another AMG until or unless they start putting those on there, standard, period.
I actually went even wider, with the 275/35's on the rear of mine (had previously done 265's)....no rubbing issues except one time, when I hit a really, really bad dip and got a small rub, but in every day driving, none.
Now, having said that, I must add a few caveats: I almost never have rear (or front, for that matter) passengers in my car, or heavy stuff in my trunk. So, ymmv...
I definitely wouldn't go with the 255's...even with the 275's, traction is still a serious issue, thanks in no small part to the FARGIN' ARSEHOLES at Mercedes Benz who were TOO CHEAP to put a limited slip on the car! And mark my words: I won't be buying another AMG until or unless they start putting those on there, standard, period.
My only concern is that with running one bump pads in the rear with euro-spec springs, I may not have as much clearance as you. Any pics of the beast with the meaty 275s in the rear?
My only concern is that with running one bump pads in the rear with euro-spec springs, I may not have as much clearance as you. Any pics of the beast with the meaty 275s in the rear?
Me might likey the look. Got any pics of that set up?
I was thinking of 265/35/18 on the rear and 235/40/17s up front. Like the original Mustang, the 208 is practically begging for a hot rod set up.
But Luke the Tireman said DON'T DO THIS since the taller rears would throw the traction control system a loop. eek:
Has anyone tried this ? If it's good enough for the CLK DTM why can't it work on a 55 AMG?
Rear has 210 E55 wheels bearing 275/35-18's, the same size as the 210 E55....here's a side shot:
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
You have to look closely to see that the wheels are not the same size. Subtle yet powerful. Modern Corvettes also have an inch more rim on the rear axle. I like the way the AMG front rotors stuff in behind the 17 inch wheel. IMHO it's hard to justify going to 18s in front unless you want to put in bigger rotors. And that starts getting expensive ....
I understand that you have no problems with traction control, etc., keeping in mind that the larger rear wheel and lower profile tire combo is no more than about half an inch larger diameter than stock. How has the change affected ride and handling?
The photo is wider than my computer screen! How could you fit it in past the server? I'm also wondering how you managed to fit in 275s. I would love to see another photo, taken from the back to show the wide stance of those meats.
And hey, thanks to you too, Chappy!! Been awhile....hope all's well in hot 'lanta!
But back to neilbo75's stuff:
Last edited by Improviz; May 17, 2006 at 01:05 AM.








