C63 is the Same as the CLK63 but better?
05-12-2008, 09:17 PM
#126
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OC, SoCal
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08 S65, 06 M3 CS(stick), 02 BMW X5 4.6iS, 07 R1 Raven, 08 F-450 4x4, 08 CooperS JCW
LOL What a douchebag snob, You don't drive a ferrari getover yourself, its just a CLK63 amg with better suspension and some CF trim and no back seat...Might as well got a 997 TT and not look like a poser... because no matter how much you think it handles good for a 3900 lbs car its a freakin porker and it seems noback seats didnt help... So, before you look down on others just remind yourself you still drive a Mercedes...Not a Ferrari, so you cant put down another Mercedes...thanks poser.
05-13-2008, 12:27 AM
#127
LOL What a douchebag snob, You don't drive a ferrari getover yourself, its just a CLK63 amg with better suspension and some CF trim and no back seat...Might as well got a 997 TT and not look like a poser... because no matter how much you think it handles good for a 3900 lbs car its a freakin porker and it seems noback seats didnt help... So, before you look down on others just remind yourself you still drive a Mercedes...Not a Ferrari, so you cant put down another Mercedes...thanks poser.
AS
05-13-2008, 01:01 AM
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
2008 CLK 63 Black Series, 2013 G63, 2014 RS5 Coupe, 2013 JKUR 10A
LOL What a douchebag snob, You don't drive a ferrari getover yourself, its just a CLK63 amg with better suspension and some CF trim and no back seat...Might as well got a 997 TT and not look like a poser... because no matter how much you think it handles good for a 3900 lbs car its a freakin porker and it seems noback seats didnt help... So, before you look down on others just remind yourself you still drive a Mercedes...Not a Ferrari, so you cant put down another Mercedes...thanks poser.
05-13-2008, 01:54 AM
#129
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL What a douchebag snob, You don't drive a ferrari getover yourself, its just a CLK63 amg with better suspension and some CF trim and no back seat...Might as well got a 997 TT and not look like a poser... because no matter how much you think it handles good for a 3900 lbs car its a freakin porker and it seems noback seats didnt help... So, before you look down on others just remind yourself you still drive a Mercedes...Not a Ferrari, so you cant put down another Mercedes...thanks poser.
The BS rocks, and you could spend a lifetime learning to drive it. Take a little time to read between the lines of AS posts.
05-13-2008, 08:12 AM
#130
LOL What a douchebag snob, You don't drive a ferrari getover yourself, its just a CLK63 amg with better suspension and some CF trim and no back seat...Might as well got a 997 TT and not look like a poser... because no matter how much you think it handles good for a 3900 lbs car its a freakin porker and it seems noback seats didnt help... So, before you look down on others just remind yourself you still drive a Mercedes...Not a Ferrari, so you cant put down another Mercedes...thanks poser.
05-13-2008, 10:08 AM
#131
Out Of Control!
LOL What a douchebag snob, You don't drive a ferrari getover yourself, its just a CLK63 amg with better suspension and some CF trim and no back seat...Might as well got a 997 TT and not look like a poser... because no matter how much you think it handles good for a 3900 lbs car its a freakin porker and it seems noback seats didnt help... So, before you look down on others just remind yourself you still drive a Mercedes...Not a Ferrari, so you cant put down another Mercedes...thanks poser.
05-13-2008, 10:49 AM
#132
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Island & Hong Kong
Posts: 1,264
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
20+ to list......
I see he is on probabtion as he deserves that, I would probably ban him for life if I were one of the moderators. I didn't quite expect to see that kind of attitute appears on an MB forum board. I guess recession has finally hit him, and hard.
05-13-2008, 11:09 AM
#133
I do this for fun and don't take any of it too serious but this dude is really an angry individual. I hope life gets better for him......
05-13-2008, 08:27 PM
#134
MBWorld Fanatic!
LOL What a douchebag snob, You don't drive a ferrari getover yourself, its just a CLK63 amg with better suspension and some CF trim and no back seat...Might as well got a 997 TT and not look like a poser... because no matter how much you think it handles good for a 3900 lbs car its a freakin porker and it seems noback seats didnt help... So, before you look down on others just remind yourself you still drive a Mercedes...Not a Ferrari, so you cant put down another Mercedes...thanks poser.
LOSER!
05-13-2008, 09:08 PM
#135
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Long Island & Hong Kong
Posts: 1,264
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
20+ to list......
Maybe he can't reply because he is on probabtion? Never been warned in any of the forums in the past and now and I don't know how it works once you are on probabtion.
05-13-2008, 09:40 PM
#136
05-14-2008, 12:25 PM
#140
MBWorld Fanatic!
LOL, I'm not a loser, At least I didn't put ricer lambo doors on my 100k+car... do that to a civic... Jrcart, your a poser and I stand behind my statement, And check my sig if you want to see what I drive...I got a Z06 that weighs in at 3094 LBS with half a tank of fuel and a driver...It has lingenfelter 660 HP Package and a 150 shot of juice whenever need may arise. I got Pfadt sway bars and Moton Clubsport coilovers. along with 295/35/19 front 345/35/19 rear Hoosier R6's on Iforged's. I make 600+rwhp alone on motor and I track this car at homestead every weekend....If you are there, I'm in a blacked out Z06... and I'm ANYTHING but jealous of your waste of polished ****.
If I wanted a black series I would've gotten it.
If I wanted a black series I would've gotten it.
05-14-2008, 12:57 PM
#141
MBWorld Fanatic!
LOL, I'm not a loser, At least I didn't put ricer lambo doors on my 100k+car... do that to a civic... Jrcart, your a poser and I stand behind my statement, And check my sig if you want to see what I drive...I got a Z06 that weighs in at 3094 LBS with half a tank of fuel and a driver...It has lingenfelter 660 HP Package and a 150 shot of juice whenever need may arise. I got Pfadt sway bars and Moton Clubsport coilovers. along with 295/35/19 front 345/35/19 rear Hoosier R6's on Iforged's. I make 600+rwhp alone on motor and I track this car at homestead every weekend....If you are there, I'm in a blacked out Z06... and I'm ANYTHING but jealous of your waste of polished ****.
If I wanted a black series I would've gotten it.
If I wanted a black series I would've gotten it.
05-14-2008, 01:25 PM
#142
MBWorld Founder
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ones too fast according to CHP!
05-14-2008, 01:46 PM
#144
MBWorld Founder
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ones too fast according to CHP!
He has 3 infractions, the third is a 30 day suspension. As the infraction points roll off, he will be back. Hopefully with a better attitude.
05-14-2008, 11:31 PM
#147
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Marietta GA.
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jaguar STR
We had a good exchange from intellegent owners with first hand experience in many diffrent models going. Glad to see the mods put the children to bed so to speak so the adults can countinue there conversation.
05-15-2008, 09:51 AM
#148
MBWorld Fanatic!
This forum is what car forums are all about. Showing everyone who much "richer" they are because of a car they bought. Hilarious.
05-15-2008, 05:44 PM
#149
MBWorld Fanatic!
Ok, I do not own any of the two cars mentioned CLK63 BS or the C63, but here is where I am finding it hard
The clk bs is supposed to be the AMG Track Car and the bad *** of the 63 range...yet a few months down the line you get the c63 with
From a 1/4 mile perspective a member on this forum TRez63 went to the AMG event, where they had many 63s including the clk bs new SL63 and the C63. From what i recall the C63 was neck and neck, or edged out the clk bs sometimes in a drag race. Even our own members are getting better times in the E63 in drag racing events
The DTM CLK as others mentioned came with a monster engine, and some claim that it had to be tuned down a bit or else it would have raped the SLR. No 55k would even think of going head to head with a DTM or an SLR and stand a chance in stock form...but in the c63 vs. clk bs 63, the fear gap is much smaller.
65 is an other topic, but the striaght line performance is
and they are not cheap!
unles you go used then you open up more room to argue value & performance.
To the M3 beats c63 round the track, what you say is true, but...the thing is the C63s that are been tested are not all equipped with the P30 package (car is lower, suspension, LSD, brakes etc), where as the M comes standard with an electronic diff I think.
Second problem Tires & wheel dimensions!!!
What tires does the M3 come with?
I saw an EVO mag review, with the M3 vs. the IS F and it had pilot cup tires (slicks!!) where as the IS F had sport tires
and then they say it makes better lap times
, am sure it would any way, but giving it pilot cups is cheating, if you are comparing them on a track!
The M3 will be getting the new DSG tranny though, before the m5 so BMW does it to, but there is a power difference between the two
lastly given the choice I would probably take the CLK Blk, but it could not be easy, unless I knew that the new changes can be incorporated into the car, which I doubt the new SL tranny could with out some heavy engineering needed
The clk bs is supposed to be the AMG Track Car and the bad *** of the 63 range...yet a few months down the line you get the c63 with
- improved tranny down blip and more responsive (something you would want for the track)
- new ESP settings (on, sport ESP or completely off. needed for track use!)
- same front parts for front axe (i think not %100 sure)
- New nav & safety equipment
- fits more people & weight is not hugely different
- looks debatable both look great
- Newer car
- price (but the CLK BS is exclusive granted )
- or better yet the SL 63 new tranny MCT ( no torq converter)
- SL 63launch control (drag race & starting off toy!)
From a 1/4 mile perspective a member on this forum TRez63 went to the AMG event, where they had many 63s including the clk bs new SL63 and the C63. From what i recall the C63 was neck and neck, or edged out the clk bs sometimes in a drag race. Even our own members are getting better times in the E63 in drag racing events
The DTM CLK as others mentioned came with a monster engine, and some claim that it had to be tuned down a bit or else it would have raped the SLR. No 55k would even think of going head to head with a DTM or an SLR and stand a chance in stock form...but in the c63 vs. clk bs 63, the fear gap is much smaller.
65 is an other topic, but the striaght line performance is
and they are not cheap! unles you go used then you open up more room to argue value & performance.To the M3 beats c63 round the track, what you say is true, but...the thing is the C63s that are been tested are not all equipped with the P30 package (car is lower, suspension, LSD, brakes etc), where as the M comes standard with an electronic diff I think.
Second problem Tires & wheel dimensions!!!
What tires does the M3 come with?
I saw an EVO mag review, with the M3 vs. the IS F and it had pilot cup tires (slicks!!) where as the IS F had sport tires
and then they say it makes better lap times
, am sure it would any way, but giving it pilot cups is cheating, if you are comparing them on a track!The M3 will be getting the new DSG tranny though, before the m5 so BMW does it to, but there is a power difference between the two
lastly given the choice I would probably take the CLK Blk, but it could not be easy, unless I knew that the new changes can be incorporated into the car, which I doubt the new SL tranny could with out some heavy engineering needed
Last edited by Zod; 05-15-2008 at 05:49 PM.
05-15-2008, 07:42 PM
#150
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=Zod;2825572]Ok, I do not own any of the two cars mentioned CLK63 BS or the C63, but here is where I am finding it hard
The clk bs is supposed to be the AMG Track Car and the bad *** of the 63 range...yet a few months down the line you get the c63 with
From a 1/4 mile perspective a member on this forum TRez63 went to the AMG event, where they had many 63s including the clk bs new SL63 and the C63. From what i recall the C63 was neck and neck, or edged out the clk bs sometimes in a drag race. Even our own members are getting better times in the E63 in drag racing events
But when they went on the big track, and autocross it wasn't even close. The BS showed its prowess. the hot laps in this car to die for!
On the drag race(s), it was more about ability to anticipate the light on the start, than anything else. The SL 63 felt like it had more HP and the transmission is great, the E63 was an amazingly competent performer and the BS was the one you wanted to take home, and was tail wagging happy all throughout the event.
The C63 was good (great in fact), but it is no Black Series by any stretch of the imagination. Back to back autocrossing in each of the cars proved that over and over again.
The clk bs is supposed to be the AMG Track Car and the bad *** of the 63 range...yet a few months down the line you get the c63 with
- improved tranny down blip and more responsive (something you would want for the track)
- new ESP settings (on, sport ESP or completely off. needed for track use!)
- same front parts for front axe (i think not %100 sure)
- New nav & safety equipment
- fits more people & weight is not hugely different
- looks debatable both look great
- Newer car
- price (but the CLK BS is exclusive granted )
- or better yet the SL 63 new tranny MCT ( no torq converter)
- SL 63launch control (drag race & starting off toy!)
From a 1/4 mile perspective a member on this forum TRez63 went to the AMG event, where they had many 63s including the clk bs new SL63 and the C63. From what i recall the C63 was neck and neck, or edged out the clk bs sometimes in a drag race. Even our own members are getting better times in the E63 in drag racing events
But when they went on the big track, and autocross it wasn't even close. The BS showed its prowess. the hot laps in this car to die for!
On the drag race(s), it was more about ability to anticipate the light on the start, than anything else. The SL 63 felt like it had more HP and the transmission is great, the E63 was an amazingly competent performer and the BS was the one you wanted to take home, and was tail wagging happy all throughout the event.
The C63 was good (great in fact), but it is no Black Series by any stretch of the imagination. Back to back autocrossing in each of the cars proved that over and over again.
