so was it with RS? is it the same as the first renntech tune or added mods? Thanks for sharing
2012 CLS63 Drag video - 11.21 @ 126 MPH!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2006 CL65
2012 CLS63 Drag video - 11.21 @ 126 MPH!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2006 CL65
RS was not used.
Sport + mode.
Tune only (same tune/different car). Its a non PP CLS63 without LSD.
Tricky getting both wheels to spin without LSD.
Last edited by SGC; Dec 2, 2011 at 05:17 PM.
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping
Verdad Gallardo
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 17
From: Toronto
2016 C63 S
Monster!!!!
You only lost a 10th in the 60 foot (1.6 vs 1.7)and held it all the way down....and had a bigger MPH....
A stronger 60 foot and you woulda fed it to him
Great job!
Definitely worth dropping the extra $2500 for the LSD
You only lost a 10th in the 60 foot (1.6 vs 1.7)and held it all the way down....and had a bigger MPH....
A stronger 60 foot and you woulda fed it to him
Great job!
Definitely worth dropping the extra $2500 for the LSD
Last edited by callmiro; Dec 2, 2011 at 08:30 PM.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2006 CL65
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Florida
2006 CL65
Yep. You're right on.
If you look at the splits, its clear what is going on.
At the 60 foot mark, the GTR has a .073 of a second advantage (1.678 vs 1.751);
By the 330 foot mark, the GTR stretches its time advantage to .183 of a second (4.635 vs 4.818).
By the 1/8th (660 feet), the GTR is losing ground as it is only .171 quicker, and the CLS is .55 mph faster (7.126 vs. 7.297) (98.43 vs 99.08 mph).
At 1000 feet, the time margin is down to .138 (9.287 vs 9.425).
By the end of the quarter mile (1320 feet), the CLS has closed the time gap to .099 and is travelling 2.22 mph faster (11.114 vs 11.213) (124.08 vs 126.30 mph).
Somebody check my math, my head hurts
.In essence the lighter AWD GTR has the advantage for the first half of the track, and starts losing ground during the last 1/8 mile.
From a roll, the 2012 GTR would have its hands full with a tuned CLS.
Last edited by SGC; Dec 3, 2011 at 10:39 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 19
From: Kuwait
CLS55 2006, CLS 63S 2015
Yep. You're right on.
If you look at the splits, its clear what is going on.
At the 60 foot mark, the GTR has a .073 of a second advantage (1.678 vs 1.751);
By the 330 foot mark, the GTR stretches its time advantage to .183 of a second (4.635 vs 4.818).
By the 1/8th (660 feet), the GTR is losing ground as it is only .171 quicker, and the CLS is .55 mph faster (7.126 vs. 7.297) (98.43 vs 99.08 mph).
At 1000 feet, the time margin is down to .138 (9.287 vs 9.425).
By the end of the quarter mile (1320 feet), the CLS has closed the time gap to .099 and is travelling 2.22 mph faster (11.114 vs 11.213) (124.08 vs 126.30 mph).
Somebody check my math, my head hurts.
In essence the lighter AWD GTR has the advantage for the first half of the track, and starts losing ground during the last 1/8 mile.
From a roll, the 2012 GTR would have its hands full with a tuned CLS.
If you look at the splits, its clear what is going on.
At the 60 foot mark, the GTR has a .073 of a second advantage (1.678 vs 1.751);
By the 330 foot mark, the GTR stretches its time advantage to .183 of a second (4.635 vs 4.818).
By the 1/8th (660 feet), the GTR is losing ground as it is only .171 quicker, and the CLS is .55 mph faster (7.126 vs. 7.297) (98.43 vs 99.08 mph).
At 1000 feet, the time margin is down to .138 (9.287 vs 9.425).
By the end of the quarter mile (1320 feet), the CLS has closed the time gap to .099 and is travelling 2.22 mph faster (11.114 vs 11.213) (124.08 vs 126.30 mph).
Somebody check my math, my head hurts
.In essence the lighter AWD GTR has the advantage for the first half of the track, and starts losing ground during the last 1/8 mile.
From a roll, the 2012 GTR would have its hands full with a tuned CLS.
I mean a Tuned cls63 could barely pass a stock 2012 GTR
on paper the power levels of the GTR and PP cls63 tip towards the cls.
Just shows how much of a beast the 2012 GTR is stock ....this is not counting the additional power bump they are getting in 2013 i.e this JAN
Lets not even bother comparing tuned vs tuned
Thing is I keep hearing about the gear box going boom
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 17
From: Toronto
2016 C63 S
This is cool and scary at the same time...
I mean a Tuned cls63 could barely pass a stock 2012 GTR
on paper the power levels of the GTR and PP cls63 tip towards the cls.
Just shows how much of a beast the 2012 GTR is stock ....this is not counting the additional power bump they are getting in 2013 i.e this JAN
Lets not even bother comparing tuned vs tuned
Thing is I keep hearing about the gear box going boom
I mean a Tuned cls63 could barely pass a stock 2012 GTR
on paper the power levels of the GTR and PP cls63 tip towards the cls.
Just shows how much of a beast the 2012 GTR is stock ....this is not counting the additional power bump they are getting in 2013 i.e this JAN
Lets not even bother comparing tuned vs tuned
Thing is I keep hearing about the gear box going boom
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
Interesting. I'm assuming you're referring to the GTR.
I just spoke with a GTR owner last night who described how Nissan is being very strict about their warranty on the transmission.
It seems Nissan is not happy with the aftermarket community and overuse of the launch control.
I just spoke with a GTR owner last night who described how Nissan is being very strict about their warranty on the transmission.
It seems Nissan is not happy with the aftermarket community and overuse of the launch control.
Super Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
a car that gets very poor gas mileage.
