Coupe/Roadster
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ground Clearance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-21-2017, 12:07 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
guynamedsean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
2017 AMG GT
Originally Posted by boosting1bar
My GT struggles with the underground garage I have to park in at home. If I get the approach and departure angle perfect the center of the car won't touch on entry/exit at the top side. If I get it wrong the center cross member rubs, haven't actually touched the side skirts but I'm always afraid it will. At the bottom there is no angle I can come in that it doesn't rub. I cut it as sharp as I can at the bottom but it always rubs. The part that rubs is the part of the lip that points downwards and the front portion of the lip sticks out far enough that you can't see the rubbed area.
I would move or lease second residence to keep GTS and other woman maybe.
Old 03-21-2017, 12:44 PM
  #27  
Member
 
boosting1bar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 105
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
cars and stuff
Originally Posted by guynamedsean
I would move or lease second residence to keep GTS and other woman maybe.
I've rented out a couple spots in the parking garage a block down so I don't have to lol
Old 06-08-2017, 07:52 PM
  #28  
Member
 
06032's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 162
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
2016 AMG GTS Edition 1, 2007 Alpina B7, 1987 560SL, 2011 E350 Wagon, Ural Patrol
Very helpful to see the effect of a 1.5" drop and level. Looks just about perfect.
Old 06-08-2017, 09:16 PM
  #29  
Member
 
descartesfool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 222
Received 144 Likes on 75 Posts
AMG GT-S, AMG C43, GLK350, Nissan GT-R, 718 Cayman
Originally Posted by California John
An interesting point is that with the Dynamic Plus Suspension package (P71) additional negative camber is added to the front wheels. How much is not public information I don't believe. Part of the "secret sauce"
No secret. It's part of the factory alignment procedure from the manual, which was posted by Alexfor8 in his maintenance thread.

https://mbworld.org/forums/amg-gt-gt...ml#post7134700


Front camber for the regular model is 1 degree 42 minutes

Front camber with P71 Dynamic Pack is 2 degrees 6 minutes

Rear camber is the same for both at 1 degree 51 minutes.

And by the way, dropping the car 1.5" is going to really screw up the suspension geometry, in terms of camber curves as the suspension moves up and down, and also toe variation, bump steer, etc. Might be OK for cruising on the street, but I would surely not do that for a car run on a race track.

Last edited by descartesfool; 06-08-2017 at 09:19 PM.
The following users liked this post:
06032 (06-09-2017)
Old 06-08-2017, 09:24 PM
  #30  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AMG 17GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATLANTA
Posts: 3,974
Received 701 Likes on 534 Posts
R Nine T
Originally Posted by descartesfool
No secret. It's part of the factory alignment procedure from the manual, which was posted by Alexfor8 in his maintenance thread.

https://mbworld.org/forums/amg-gt-gt...ml#post7134700


Front camber for the regular model is 1 degree 42 minutes

Front camber with P71 Dynamic Pack is 2 degrees 6 minutes

Rear camber is the same for both at 1 degree 51 minutes.

And by the way, dropping the car 1.5" is going to really screw up the suspension geometry, in terms of camber curves as the suspension moves up and down, and also toe variation, bump steer, etc. Might be OK for cruising on the street, but I would surely not do that for a car run on a race track.
This man runs on tracks. I would follow that advice.
Old 06-09-2017, 08:21 AM
  #31  
Member
 
06032's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 162
Received 26 Likes on 23 Posts
2016 AMG GTS Edition 1, 2007 Alpina B7, 1987 560SL, 2011 E350 Wagon, Ural Patrol
Great insight. Aside from aesthetics, sounds like it's counterproductive to lower this car. Suspension 'as is' (with DPP, anyway) is already '98%' with the benefit of not needing to worry excessively about uneven driveway approaches or potentially insurmountable alignment issues.
Old 06-09-2017, 10:18 AM
  #32  
Member
 
larrymz3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
AMG GTS Edition 1
Agreed!
Old 06-09-2017, 05:18 PM
  #33  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Case1906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,147
Received 127 Likes on 76 Posts
AMG GTBS, AMG GTR Pro, AMG GT, C63 AMG, Porsche Panamera 4S, RX-7 FC Turbo II
Originally Posted by 06032
Great insight. Aside from aesthetics, sounds like it's counterproductive to lower this car. Suspension 'as is' (with DPP, anyway) is already '98%' with the benefit of not needing to worry excessively about uneven driveway approaches or potentially insurmountable alignment issues.

Except that our OEM cars look like they are on stilts. To Descartes post, at least RennTech, KW and Weistech coilovers are adjustable, unlike H&R. I wonder if these guys would like to comment on the suspension geometry issue??

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.