Drag Race GT3 RS vs AMG GTS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 11:28 AM
  #26  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Ya, I don't know what I am talking about......SMH my car laid down the quickest non-corrected real world stock baseline number that I have seen to date(if any of you have video proof of a stock GT-S going any quicker uncorrected I am all ears. My pass was done at nearly sea level and in great conditions and still only managed an 11.41. Most guys are laying down high 11's in stock form. Half of you probably don't even know what a corrected number is but you are on here spouting of E/T's like you guys are John Force or something.


Car and Driver 11.8 corrected to 11.5 and they also had a test where they posted a 11.2 but it was again a corrected time.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...e-drive-review

Motor Week 11.6

Road & Track 11.7 corrected to 11.3


Here is a link to my thread and baseline passes. Car was bone stock with stock tires aired down to about 22psi

https://mbworld.org/forums/amg-gt-gt...ing-video.html
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 11:28 AM
  #27  
RobbieRob's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 967
Likes: 39
From: PA
18'Porsche GT3, 16' Ram 3500 mega diesel,30' Model A Ratrod, 17' E43
Sorry, I can't find a 1/4 mile amateur driven gt3 to compare, and this is a GT3(11:21@123.69mph) and not an RS. Like I said in my previous post, the AMG GTs is typically an 11:40 car and the GT3rs is a 11:teens car(GT3 is a 11:high 20's car), driven by amateur's, not pro's or magazine testers,, just real world numbers for most owners. 1/2 mile is a different story, the GTs will definitely beat the GT3rs but it wont be as bad as in the original OP's video. In the video it doesn't show the GT3rs in front of the GTs at all, that's where the question comes to mind. And I still think the Huracan will beat a 570s. lol

Last edited by RobbieRob; Dec 21, 2016 at 12:05 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 11:38 AM
  #28  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by AMG 17GT
Ok facts then : JB C63s ran a 11:38 1/4.

.
Do you have video proof of this? A very good friend of mine owns a C63S(sedan) and he was running 11.9's-12.0's all summer in it.

Car and Driver put down a 12.1 corrected to a 12.0

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t-drive-review

All you guys' "facts" and "knowledge" are truly amazing
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 01:31 PM
  #29  
cec69's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 114
Likes: 20
2016 GTS, 2017 S550 Cabriolet, 2015 911Turbo S 2016Q5, 2008 Z06
Originally Posted by jrcart
Does the truth hurt? facts are facts, the GT3 will run consistent 11.40 in the real world and the GT-S is in the high 11's 11.9-11.9....I've run both cars down a drag strip, have you???? You're a chump bro!!!
Truth is, you just keep spouting the same old ****.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 01:53 PM
  #30  
rsalco's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 157
Likes: 7
'16 AMG GT S, '16 ML400. '11 SCCA T1 Z06
Originally Posted by Vic55
I don't know much about the C7 Z06 other than its an amazing performer but I have heard from a few local owners (who are relatively skilled at driving) that the car can literally scare them at 60 mph These are all AT8 owners.


Is this what you have encountered too?

My Z was a C6 M6; very different car to C7 A8. As far as being 'scary', the C6Z had a well-deserved reputation for snap-oversteer when applying power exiting turns. There was a very defined line you didn't want to cross. Converted to T1 specs - upper & lower control arms, springs, sway-bars, shocks, bushings - the limit is much increased with great stability, but it is still possible to induce snap-oversteer. Which certainly can get one's heart-rate up. I've stared at the turn 9 exit guardrail a time or two getting a little too exuberant with the power coming onto the West Tunnel chute. Quick hands being exceedingly important at that juncture......
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 01:57 PM
  #31  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Originally Posted by jrcart
Do you have video proof of this? A very good friend of mine owns a C63S(sedan) and he was running 11.9's-12.0's all summer in it.

Car and Driver put down a 12.1 corrected to a 12.0

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t-drive-review

All you guys' "facts" and "knowledge" are truly amazing
Can't compare a mct c class....

Having a Senior moment ? You even commented on it in other drag thread

Drag Race GT3 RS vs AMG GTS-img_1086.jpg
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 02:24 PM
  #32  
Petegtsv10's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 148
Likes: 9
AMG GTS , AMG C43
Originally Posted by Vic55
I don't know much about the C7 Z06 other than its an amazing performer but I have heard from a few local owners (who are relatively skilled at driving) that the car can literally scare them at 60 mph These are all AT8 owners.


Is this what you have encountered too?
Pretty much. 650-700 hp is past the limit for a red car. You need to be aware and do most of your playing on warm roads with warm tires.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 02:34 PM
  #33  
Vic55's Avatar
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador

20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 12,263
Likes: 901
From: THE Orange County, California
2024 C8 Z06- 2025 BMW CS- 2022 Porsche 992 GTS
Originally Posted by AMG 17GT
Can't compare a mct c class....

Having a Senior moment ? You even commented on it in other drag thread

Attachment 345446


Was this 100% stock? Trap speed seems very high...
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 02:54 PM
  #34  
AMG 17GT's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,005
Likes: 711
From: ATLANTA
R Nine T
Originally Posted by Vic55
Was this 100% stock? Trap speed seems very high...
Yeah it was a great run by John that he posted in his other drag thread. Hopefully he can chime in.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2016 | 09:03 PM
  #35  
emericr's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 170
From: Naples FL
2021 Porsche TTS
Jrcrat: not trying to discredit what you are saying but MT had 11.4 for the GT-S on the 2016 world greatest drag race and 11.6 for 2015. It did not seem like a "pro" set up on a professional drag strip but just a crude airport one.
Are the MT numbers corrected corrected or real in the video?
Dragtimes also shows 2 stock GTS at 11.3X.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2016 | 10:04 AM
  #36  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by emericr
Jrcrat: not trying to discredit what you are saying but MT had 11.4 for the GT-S on the 2016 world greatest drag race and 11.6 for 2015. It did not seem like a "pro" set up on a professional drag strip but just a crude airport one.
Are the MT numbers corrected corrected or real in the video?
Dragtimes also shows 2 stock GTS at 11.3X.
No way they ran a 11.40(uncorrected)on an unprepped runway. I have competed in over a dozen 1/2 mile and 1 mile runway shootouts and I can tell you that there is absolutely ZERO traction, that is why most airstrip events are rolling starts and not from a dig. I will bet the title of every vehicle I own and the deeds on the 3 houses I own and a night in bed with my wife if anyone can put down a GPS or V-Box verified 11.4 in a bone stock GT-S on a runway. I would honestly be very surprised if anyone could even lay down a 12.4 on an unprepped runway in a GT-S. Some of you guys seem to forget this is all I do, I actually race my cars at drag strips, airstrip events and road course events, I am not some noob with no clue and I learned years ago not to believe most of the stuff magazines publish.

Last edited by jrcart; Dec 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2016 | 10:25 AM
  #37  
RobbieRob's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 967
Likes: 39
From: PA
18'Porsche GT3, 16' Ram 3500 mega diesel,30' Model A Ratrod, 17' E43
Originally Posted by jrcart
No way they ran a 11.40(uncorrected)on an unprepped runway. I have competed in over a dozen 1/2 mile and 1 mile runway shootouts and I can tell you that there is absolutely ZERO traction, that is why most airstrip events are rolling starts and not from a dig. I will bet the title of every vehicle I own and the deeds on the 3 houses I own and a night in bed with my wife if anyone can put down a GPS or V-Box verified 11.4 in a bone stock GT-S on a runway. I would honestly be very surprised if anyone could even lay down a 12.4 on an unprepped runway in a GT-S. Some of you guys seem to forget this is all I do, I actually race my cars at drag strips, airstrip events and road course events, I am not some noob with no clue and I learned years ago not to believe most of the stuff magazines publish.



So true, real world vs magazine times are so far off. I've been around guys at the drag strip with their brand new cars(many different brand/models) and when they race their car, they can't figure out why it is going .5 -.8 seconds slower than what a magazine says. Then these people think right away that there is something wrong with their car..lol. Also, no one ever thinks about Temps, track surface temp, DA,, etc. Many things go into getting a fast or slow time at the drag strip and airway events, its never an identical condition.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 02:30 PM
  #38  
MBWorld Editor's Avatar
IB Staff
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 664
Likes: 30
Front page news!

Front page news indeed!
https://mbworld.org/articles/mercede...he-911-gt3-rs/
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 08:20 AM
  #39  
rsalco's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 157
Likes: 7
'16 AMG GT S, '16 ML400. '11 SCCA T1 Z06
Silly stuff. Absolutely pointless given the design brief for any of these cars. Especially if you understand there are '32 Fords running around out there that can kill all of these super-cars in a 1/4-1/2 mile drag. Road-course shoot-outs are the measure of our cars' performance; it's what they are engineered to excel at.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 10:55 AM
  #40  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by RobbieRob
So true, real world vs magazine times are so far off. I've been around guys at the drag strip with their brand new cars(many different brand/models) and when they race their car, they can't figure out why it is going .5 -.8 seconds slower than what a magazine says. Then these people think right away that there is something wrong with their car..lol. Also, no one ever thinks about Temps, track surface temp, DA,, etc. Many things go into getting a fast or slow time at the drag strip and airway events, its never an identical condition.
Yes, 100% agree and have seen the very same thing that's why I am not even going to comment on this thread any longer. Sometimes dealing with all these "experts" is like banging my head on a brick wall. I've got more track miles in my AMG's than some of these clowns have total miles on theirs but they will beat you down with all the "proof and facts" they find on places like You Tube, Facebook and Motor Trend TV....because everything you see on the internet is true, right lol? You mention DA, half these guys probably don't even know what that is. I've had my car strapped to the very same dyno for two days in a row and it has made nearly 10 less HP simply due to atmospheric and weather changes that occurred over night. Those very same +/- 10 hp on a real track with a real head wind, tail wind or cross wind can result in +/- 2/10th's of a second ET on a track. You only need to look as far as an NHRA top fuel event, one weekend the top guys are running 330+ mph passes and the next weekend the same guys on the same teams in the very same cars might be only(only lol) running 315mph, and we are talking about professionals, the best of the best... conditions play a huge roll in performance.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 11:06 AM
  #41  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by rsalco
Silly stuff. Absolutely pointless given the design brief for any of these cars. Especially if you understand there are '32 Fords running around out there that can kill all of these super-cars in a 1/4-1/2 mile drag. Road-course shoot-outs are the measure of our cars' performance; it's what they are engineered to excel at.
Very true, the GT/GT-R is not a drag car. What is impressive about modern cars is how they get down the track. I have lined up at the drag strip against 9 second muscle cars that rip the front wheels off the ground and jump out to a 5 car lead and then I just reel them in and pass them, sometimes before the 1/8 mile point. I raced a 68 Camaro once and we finished in almost a tie, I think I won by under a tenth but afterwards watching the video I was amazed at the differences in the two cars moving down the track, they each had a very different launch, the Camaro jumped out to a huge lead, each car had much different shifting, the Camaro looked almost out of control and loose and my CLK looked planted, so planted it looked slow, yet we both crossed the beam at nearly the same time. My trap speed was a good 20 mph faster but two 9 second cars can be very very different. Technology truly is amazing, suspension technology, traction control, launch control, aero. 20 years ago a 13 second car was fast, these days we have stock production cars capable of running 10 second passes.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 03:58 PM
  #42  
JB C63S's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 186
Likes: 10
2016 GTS, 2016 GLE, 2013 SLK55, 2015 GLA, 2015 GLK, 2014 E350, 2013 GLK
Hi guys,
Glad to see my Drag Times thread being referenced! And still waiting for more timeslips from others!!

My GTS totally stock ran 11.38 and repeated 11.4s all night. Uncorrected. Stock tires, airfilters, everything. Normal fuel.

Then I got it tuned by Weistec. Still ran 11.4s. Lots of traction issues. Track prep was nothing special. Speed was 129.6mph, indicating lots of power. Plenty to get into 10s. Able to run down a well- driven C7 Z06. Bad 60' times.

I've pondered getting a set of drag radials just to log a good 10.7 or 10.8 and have an official ten second car, but my ego and my thriftiness are still debating this plan.

Despite my username I never owned a C63S. Sorry for any confusion.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 04:14 PM
  #43  
JB C63S's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 186
Likes: 10
2016 GTS, 2016 GLE, 2013 SLK55, 2015 GLA, 2015 GLK, 2014 E350, 2013 GLK


Im actually quite surprised at how consisten these cars are and how accurate the magazines are. Motor trend says it does 11.4 at 124. Stock mine did 11.35 at 125.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 04:15 PM
  #44  
JB C63S's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 186
Likes: 10
2016 GTS, 2016 GLE, 2013 SLK55, 2015 GLA, 2015 GLK, 2014 E350, 2013 GLK
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 04:22 PM
  #45  
JB C63S's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 186
Likes: 10
2016 GTS, 2016 GLE, 2013 SLK55, 2015 GLA, 2015 GLK, 2014 E350, 2013 GLK


I talked to Weistec about how they ran 10.9 with a slower speed than mine and they said they had a private track with excellent prep. They did a rolling burnout to the 60' mark, then had a great driver stage it on the fresh burnout. He used launch mode. Thats all fair to my mind. They also had a hotter day than I did, likely explaining most of the mph difference.

Good fresh tires and the right pressure. Thats whatcha need for tens.

And a 1.70 60'
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 04:29 PM
  #46  
JB C63S's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 186
Likes: 10
2016 GTS, 2016 GLE, 2013 SLK55, 2015 GLA, 2015 GLK, 2014 E350, 2013 GLK
Weistec and I both ran 3.88 in the second 1/8th, indicating its all in the launch.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2017 | 09:39 AM
  #47  
emericr's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 170
From: Naples FL
2021 Porsche TTS
JBC63S: thanks for tuning in and giving us real world data.
Too bad you did an 11.3X and not an 11.4X cause jrcrat would have to transfer deeds to his homes and titles to his cars
Great driving by the way and I also have seen the GT-S do those times but there is little point trying to argue with jrcart as he knows best...
I can't wait to get mine tuned and I am no pro on the dragstrip so will probably be thrilled with low 11s
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2017 | 10:03 AM
  #48  
jrcart's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 55
From: Naperville, IL/Chicago
2008 CLK63 Black Series 2012 C63 Black Series 2014 SLS Black Series
Originally Posted by JB C63S


I talked to Weistec about how they ran 10.9 with a slower speed than mine and they said they had a private track with excellent prep. They did a rolling burnout to the 60' mark, then had a great driver stage it on the fresh burnout. He used launch mode. Thats all fair to my mind. They also had a hotter day than I did, likely explaining most of the mph difference.

Good fresh tires and the right pressure. Thats whatcha need for tens.

And a 1.70 60'
A lower E/T will almost always result in a lower trap speed. You need to look at the 60ft time to figure out the trap speed, a higher 60ft means more wheel spin and will always result in a higher trap speed.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:20 AM.

story-0
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-1
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-4
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE