Another 2010 ML350 Bluetec engine seized
#601
Super Member
Speaking of incorrect oil, service interval is roughly 10,000 miles if you are using Synthetic oil, but half that if using non synthetic. Hyundai has the same interval specifying synthetic on the new Sonata. I caught the Hyundai dealer putting in conventional oil, then he argued, said it was the correct oil,I told him but its not synthetic, and the manual specifies the type which is synthetic, it changes the service interval significantly. It was Like talking to a brick wall.
So was the Mercedes dealer using the correct oil or putting in a cheaper oil, lower interval oil.
So was the Mercedes dealer using the correct oil or putting in a cheaper oil, lower interval oil.
The following users liked this post:
krd2023 (05-17-2019)
#602
Senior Member
My engine OM642 did seize due to sucking some water and I am not blaming Stuttgart for this
Out of curiosity I took the engine with 180,000 miles apart and beside need for cleaning intake flaps, I did not see why the engine would not make it to million miles.
That is why I tend to believe that it takes major screw -up to kill this engine, but my engine was pre-DEF version, when all those reported seized are newer models, so maybe there is a difference?
Sounds to me you don't understand that Stuttgart MB headquarters are not responsible for US Joe putting not recommended oil.
Out of curiosity I took the engine with 180,000 miles apart and beside need for cleaning intake flaps, I did not see why the engine would not make it to million miles.
That is why I tend to believe that it takes major screw -up to kill this engine, but my engine was pre-DEF version, when all those reported seized are newer models, so maybe there is a difference?
Sounds to me you don't understand that Stuttgart MB headquarters are not responsible for US Joe putting not recommended oil.
Diesel is typically dark even after changing. I found that there’s oil old up in the filter housing. I sucked it out and poured fresh oil into the filter housing. I think the oil was only partially changed, an incomplete drain.
in speaking with many service managers, they didn’t know there’s another oil for the bluetec and also the invoices are automated to have a specific oil even if it’s not used. At least viewing from the filler, engine is clean. Filter has some varnish deposits at 110,000 miles.
it seems like the norm that large companies will ignoring or has lighting the complaints from minorities in this case diesel owners. MB did have a class action on the gas engines 1990-2000 era when it when to long OCI on the gas engine.
you might have better luck on Facebook.
my flapper motor and plastic links needed to be replaced at 80000 miles due carbon build up and brittle plastic. Turbo at 85000. Rear oil seal leaking at 70,000. Transmission not engaging on very cold days (0 to 10 F) May have always been that way but moved to cold-moderate winter area. DPF and no Urea.
The following users liked this post:
krd2023 (05-17-2019)
#603
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
17 GLS450, 20 GLS450
So, I'm looking to replace my 13 X166 GL550 with a 15 GL350. After reading this thread, I'm plain scared.
What percentage of these motors have this issue (early failure). Is it like the infamous IMS bearing issue on the 996 Porsche that affected less than 5% of them?
The vehicle I am looking has has had no issues, has had regular 10k or there about oil changes with A0019893701. It was always a Texas vehicle (warm to hot weather). I had it PPI by the local MB dealership with a clean bill of health paying special attention to the oil cooler for leaks, cracks and known issues with the DEF tank, pump and heater and the DPF. Nothing found. The VMI shows no issues related to the engine, etc.
Can I reasonable expect with 5k oil changes, 229.52 or a CK-4 15w40, DEF toped off, Diesel gas treatment at all fill-ups, using 3-5% Biodiesel and engine flushes prior to each oil change (it's due for one now) and remove the bottom splash pan and cosmetic engine cover (better cooling) to not have these issues with this new purchase, Or, should I just get the GL/GLS450 and deal with the pooer fuel economy?
What, if anything, am I missing (it's quite a long thread to read).
Thanks in advance.
What percentage of these motors have this issue (early failure). Is it like the infamous IMS bearing issue on the 996 Porsche that affected less than 5% of them?
The vehicle I am looking has has had no issues, has had regular 10k or there about oil changes with A0019893701. It was always a Texas vehicle (warm to hot weather). I had it PPI by the local MB dealership with a clean bill of health paying special attention to the oil cooler for leaks, cracks and known issues with the DEF tank, pump and heater and the DPF. Nothing found. The VMI shows no issues related to the engine, etc.
Can I reasonable expect with 5k oil changes, 229.52 or a CK-4 15w40, DEF toped off, Diesel gas treatment at all fill-ups, using 3-5% Biodiesel and engine flushes prior to each oil change (it's due for one now) and remove the bottom splash pan and cosmetic engine cover (better cooling) to not have these issues with this new purchase, Or, should I just get the GL/GLS450 and deal with the pooer fuel economy?
What, if anything, am I missing (it's quite a long thread to read).
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by C63-USA; 06-18-2019 at 08:15 AM.
The following users liked this post:
krd2023 (06-18-2019)
#604
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm not trying to diminish anyone's bad experience, because these are real problems, but generally speaking this appears to be a statistically insignificant occurrence. It is also likely caused by poor practices at the dealers at which they were serviced.
With the number of these engines out there, literally millions, we have only heard of a few such occurrences. Taking into account the ones we haven't heard of, maybe there have been a couple dozen in total.
I think the problem stems from dealers using inexperienced staff/technicians to do a 'simple' oil change, and likely because of the similar nomenclature to gas models (ie the '350'), that the wrong oil was used OR the dealers cheaped-out and used Mobil 1 ESP, which does not perform as well as the MB-branded oil, in that is get about half the life before it starts to oxidize. So, I we bring our OM642s in for their 15,000Km (9,329 miles) oil change interval, as is appropriate, then we have been driving for 5,000kms on degraded Mobil 1 OR 15,000kms on an oil that does not have adequate soot-holding properties and is subject to heavy sludge build-up in the pan and passages.
On my R320 CDI, I have 220,000kms, although it's not a bluetec, it actually has heavier EGR which is worse than the bluetec. I do oil changes every 18,000 - 20,000kms and it still runs like a dream. I generally use Amsoil 5W40 but the MB-branded oil has very comparable results from oil analysis. If you're doing 5K oil changes, then the Mobil 1 ESP is just fine.
With the number of these engines out there, literally millions, we have only heard of a few such occurrences. Taking into account the ones we haven't heard of, maybe there have been a couple dozen in total.
I think the problem stems from dealers using inexperienced staff/technicians to do a 'simple' oil change, and likely because of the similar nomenclature to gas models (ie the '350'), that the wrong oil was used OR the dealers cheaped-out and used Mobil 1 ESP, which does not perform as well as the MB-branded oil, in that is get about half the life before it starts to oxidize. So, I we bring our OM642s in for their 15,000Km (9,329 miles) oil change interval, as is appropriate, then we have been driving for 5,000kms on degraded Mobil 1 OR 15,000kms on an oil that does not have adequate soot-holding properties and is subject to heavy sludge build-up in the pan and passages.
On my R320 CDI, I have 220,000kms, although it's not a bluetec, it actually has heavier EGR which is worse than the bluetec. I do oil changes every 18,000 - 20,000kms and it still runs like a dream. I generally use Amsoil 5W40 but the MB-branded oil has very comparable results from oil analysis. If you're doing 5K oil changes, then the Mobil 1 ESP is just fine.
#605
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
17 GLS450, 20 GLS450
Thanks for the reply Marc. I also have noticed that despite the new GLS350d being available in the rest of the world, it hasn't been offered in the 3 models years since the model's nomenclature change. An article penned in 2016 indicated that there were issues with the EPA compliance. Seems odd to drop the motor from the lineup just in North America.
The following users liked this post:
krd2023 (07-12-2019)
#606
What ever happened?
Status on any related class-action, recalls, or remedies please? I'm experiencing a Mercedes nightmare currently. My 2010 ML350 BLUETEC's engine just seized at 82K miles, all after regular dealer maintenance in Montana and after several major dealer repairs since 2010 (including AdBlue heater and oil cooler seal leak @ approx. 65K miles, leading to catastrophic engine failure last week). Mercedes says they'll do nothing to assist as my 50K-mile warranty has expired, so my attorney is sending MBUSA a Demand Letter. I'm happy to join forces with others of you who are experiencing, or have experienced, similar issues with Mercedes!
I bought this car new, was my first Mercedes, and I adhered to the dealer maintenance schedule and proper steps whenever a warning light came on. Ironically, not a single warning light was on prior to the engine seizing. MBUSA has denied me any assistance in writing, as has the dealer. I'm reading everywhere of similar oil leaks / pressure issues with this engine. I have a list of major dealer repairs I had done since I bought this car new. I would expect MBUSA to accept accountability and am really disappointed so far in MBUSA. For similar experiences, see also : http://www.mbca.org/forum/2015-02-11...y#comment-form and https://mbworld.org/forums/diesel-fo...ne-siezed.html
I bought this car new, was my first Mercedes, and I adhered to the dealer maintenance schedule and proper steps whenever a warning light came on. Ironically, not a single warning light was on prior to the engine seizing. MBUSA has denied me any assistance in writing, as has the dealer. I'm reading everywhere of similar oil leaks / pressure issues with this engine. I have a list of major dealer repairs I had done since I bought this car new. I would expect MBUSA to accept accountability and am really disappointed so far in MBUSA. For similar experiences, see also : http://www.mbca.org/forum/2015-02-11...y#comment-form and https://mbworld.org/forums/diesel-fo...ne-siezed.html
The following users liked this post:
JLBock (03-07-2020)
#607
Member
Thread Starter
Hi, no luck with me, unfortunately, after I explored all reasonable efforts with dealer and MBUSA. I washed my hands of the 2010 ML350 Diesel, sold it at a loss, and I don't plan to buy another Mercedes. Good luck with your efforts and please let us know if you reach a resolution.
#608
Member
Thread Starter
Hi, no luck with me, unfortunately, after I explored all reasonable efforts with dealer and MBUSA. I washed my hands of the 2010 ML350 Diesel, sold it at a loss, and I don't plan to buy another Mercedes. Good luck with your efforts and please let us know if you reach a resolution.
#609
sold my 09 gl320 because of one check engine light after another $$$$$$$, junk as far as I'm concerned so i bought a 06 4runner. i stick to old 80's mercedes when they were built like tanks
#610
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,730 Likes
on
1,380 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
Those models had real oil pressure gauge, with oil tube going to the dash gauge. That requires disconnecting when you pull the cluster and from time to time mechanic forgets to reconnect it.
Once you have driver seat and interior sprayed with diesel oil and the car is already aged- the car gets totaled.
#612
2014 ML350 Bluetec check coolant warning
Starting at about 90k miles I got a 'Check Coolant' warning. My MB dealer said that they found the coolant leak and fixed it. I got the same warning at 103k miles and was told that they would do a 'courtesy' repair because my 100k extended warranty had expired. I have now had a third 'Check Coolant' warning at 110k miles. I asked if this is a know issue and was given the following explanation: 'The check coolant level warning only indicates a lose of coolant. This could point to one or more of many different warn parts in the coolant system. The bad part/s are identified by doing a pressure test and then replaced. And now that my warranty has expired I'll need to start paying for the leaking coolant repairs. Your car is getting old and will need more repairs'
My question is this, is this a know issue with the ML350 Bluetec? And does it last about 100k miles and then start to need a lot of repairs? Your comments would be very much appreciated.
My question is this, is this a know issue with the ML350 Bluetec? And does it last about 100k miles and then start to need a lot of repairs? Your comments would be very much appreciated.
#613
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,730 Likes
on
1,380 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
OM642 don't have known coolant leaks issue, but you had 2 of them repaired, so what was it?
#614
I was told the first one was an easy "o-ring" fix. The second one was very difficult and required the engine to be removed and it took a week to do. For this most recent third visit both the coolant system and the engine were pressure tested and no leaks were found. The coolant level was noted and refilled. I've been asked to return if and when the low coolant level warning light comes on and the coolant level will be examined and a calculation will be done to determine the coolant loss rate. This will indicate whether or not its within acceptable limits. Apparently a small amount of coolant is loss during normal operation because the diesel engine runs hot. Is this the experience of others on this forum?
#615
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,610
Received 1,522 Likes
on
1,121 Posts
'21 AMG53 wDPP & ARC, 19 GLC300 - Former- 10&14 ML BlueTecs, 20 GLE450 E-ABC, 15 Cayenne D, 17 Macan
I don't think "a small amount of coolant loss is normal," or "the diesel engine runs hot" are accurate statements. I'd ask for Tech Bulletins to justify those statements. Hope you find the smoking gun.
#616
Senior Member
I was told the first one was an easy "o-ring" fix. The second one was very difficult and required the engine to be removed and it took a week to do. For this most recent third visit both the coolant system and the engine were pressure tested and no leaks were found. The coolant level was noted and refilled. I've been asked to return if and when the low coolant level warning light comes on and the coolant level will be examined and a calculation will be done to determine the coolant loss rate. This will indicate whether or not its within acceptable limits. Apparently a small amount of coolant is loss during normal operation because the diesel engine runs hot. Is this the experience of others on this forum?
Barbara Streisand
1. "required the engine to be removed and it took a week to do"
Really. Eight hours a day for five days?
2. "diesel engine runs hot"
Really. Hot as compared to what?
3. "small amount of coolant is loss during normal operation"
Really. Is that so?
#617
Senior Member
Hi, no luck with me, unfortunately, after I explored all reasonable efforts with dealer and MBUSA. I washed my hands of the 2010 ML350 Diesel, sold it at a loss, and I don't plan to buy another Mercedes. Good luck with your efforts and please let us know if you reach a resolution.
#619
Senior Member
What the reason why Mobil 1 ESP 0W40 is no longer on the approved 229.51 list? The 100C viscosity is only 12.9 for ESP 40 weight and a high 12.0 for the ESP 30 weight.
Rotella T6 30 weight is on the 228.51 list but not Rotella T6 40. Is the Rotella 40 weight too thick (uses tradition US viscosity instead of european thin 40 weight.
Rotella T6 30 weight is on the 228.51 list but not Rotella T6 40. Is the Rotella 40 weight too thick (uses tradition US viscosity instead of european thin 40 weight.
#620
My 2013 ML350 Bluetec had 137k miles on it when I drove 200+ miles to the dealer to have the recall done. The engine seized after the recall was done while the technician was test driving it. On tear down, the no 1 main bearing seized onto the crank. I have used Amzoil since buying the vehicle new, there was zero sludge. MB offered $1500 on a certified or $3000 on new. I am still wondering why it seized.
#621
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: V E G A S
Posts: 9,067
Received 1,730 Likes
on
1,380 Posts
1922 Ford Model T / no OBD
My 2013 ML350 Bluetec had 137k miles on it when I drove 200+ miles to the dealer to have the recall done. The engine seized after the recall was done while the technician was test driving it. On tear down, the no 1 main bearing seized onto the crank. I have used Amzoil since buying the vehicle new, there was zero sludge. MB offered $1500 on a certified or $3000 on new. I am still wondering why it seized.
The above reports were due to oil turning solid, what I understand is some kind of chemical phenomena, but bearing seizing on oil with no sludge?
137k miles is nothing for those engines.
Where do you have 200 miles to the dealer anyway?
Sprinter owners report that MB USA offers good pricing on new engines. I hope it will be the same for your ML.
Keep us posted?
Last edited by kajtek1; 06-30-2021 at 02:29 AM.
#623
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,685
Received 763 Likes
on
529 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
My 2013 ML350 Bluetec had 137k miles on it when I drove 200+ miles to the dealer to have the recall done. The engine seized after the recall was done while the technician was test driving it. On tear down, the no 1 main bearing seized onto the crank. I have used Amzoil since buying the vehicle new, there was zero sludge. MB offered $1500 on a certified or $3000 on new. I am still wondering why it seized.
#624
The 2013 Bluetec required MB 229.51, not 229.52. Amzoil passes the MB 229.51 spec and is regarded as a very good lubricant regardless of how it is sold. As I first wrote my engine had zero sludge and was remarkably clean. I did forget to mention in the first post that the oil level was good. Regarding the 229.52 spec, all I have found for information so far is that the 229.52 addressed foaming and fuel efficiency. I have seen in another thread where MB had retrofitted 9 liter pans with 14 liter pans, but that was in the UK.
#625
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,685
Received 763 Likes
on
529 Posts
W204 C63 Coupe, W166 ML350 BlueTEC, 928GT, C5 Z06 & IS300 race cars, EQE 4Matic+ on order
Diabolis,
The 2013 Bluetec required MB 229.51, not 229.52. Amzoil passes the MB 229.51 spec and is regarded as a very good lubricant regardless of how it is sold. As I first wrote my engine had zero sludge and was remarkably clean. I did forget to mention in the first post that the oil level was good. Regarding the 229.52 spec, all I have found for information so far is that the 229.52 addressed foaming and fuel efficiency. I have seen in another thread where MB had retrofitted 9 liter pans with 14 liter pans, but that was in the UK.
The 2013 Bluetec required MB 229.51, not 229.52. Amzoil passes the MB 229.51 spec and is regarded as a very good lubricant regardless of how it is sold. As I first wrote my engine had zero sludge and was remarkably clean. I did forget to mention in the first post that the oil level was good. Regarding the 229.52 spec, all I have found for information so far is that the 229.52 addressed foaming and fuel efficiency. I have seen in another thread where MB had retrofitted 9 liter pans with 14 liter pans, but that was in the UK.
AFAIK the primary purpose of the MB 229.52 spec was to better deal with the fuel dilution aspect as a result of the biodiesel content when the issues resulting from the same first started to manifest themselves. The fuel efficiency was a (distant) secondary concern. And, while the AMSOIL sythetics are made from very good base stocks, their additive blending generally sucks and they have only one 5W-40 oil that has MB 229.51 approval and none that have MB 229.52.