Your Oppinion about an 300 CE-24 '90 (W124)
I'm new here and want to ask for your oppinion as I'm a BMW Specialist but never had a close look at a Merc. I've the chance to buy following car here in Spain:
MB 300 CE-24 '90, (220HP) black, leather, Wheels, Automatic + Tempo, Elect+heated Seats, Elecr Roof, Electr Curtain, Alarm, Wood, Second Horn, Automatic Climate, 240.000km , and as u see in the pictures the condition is very good. The seller wants 4900eur for it.
What do you thing about that Engine (220HP) as I've read many things about and mostly negative.
Best regards from Spain and thank u for your Answers...




Last edited by klobuznik; Aug 1, 2007 at 03:12 PM.
Set aside money for regular maintenance though. There are wear parts that will go out at a regular basis. Engine mounts, brake pads, bushings, struts.
The weaknesses are well known. The one that shows is when the rear screen delaminates and produces a milky fringe. That's an expensive repair (up to 1000 euro?), but there are some wise ones about who recommend living with it, as it's not that unsightly (and it is possible to conceal it). From my observations and direct experience, all the M103 and M104 engines are prone to head-gasket leakage at the rear of the block (LHS as you view from the front) and at the front via the timing-chain cover. Many tolerate these dribbles for many thousands of miles, as they rarely seem to get spectacular. A car with 240k km on it may well have had both done (and the rear screen would have weakened many km ago). I guess the one you're looking at pre-dates the era of failing wiring harnesses, so that shouldn't be a worry (it hit a wider range of cars than the W124 and affects years 1991 through 1996, I think).
I've seen people expressing a preference for the early 24-valve engine. Its main characteristic seems to be that it needs to be pushed to release the torque sitting high up the rev range (maxing at 4600, compared with 3750 for the later 3200 engine), which suits a pushy driving style.







