Lowering the CE
#1
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1988 300CE
Lowering the CE
I have Bilstein Hd's with H&R Springs up front with stock pads, but i'm disappointed with the drop. It sits higher in the front than in the back and i'm looking to get it lower.
currrently the gap is about 1.5 -2 inches or 3 fingers. I want it to sit right at the fender like the picture of the white CE.
Would swapping to Bilstein Sport & removing spring pad get a decent drop?
currrently the gap is about 1.5 -2 inches or 3 fingers. I want it to sit right at the fender like the picture of the white CE.
Would swapping to Bilstein Sport & removing spring pad get a decent drop?
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Long Beach, Ca
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
lots of cars
I know what you mean, I have the same setup. I'm looking for different front springs because i do like how it sit on the back. I'm going to try to remove the bump pads too but let me know your progress. I think the height is perfect for 19s but i don't like the front height.
#4
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1988 300CE
Any other comments? I see a lot of views and no comments. I have searched but a lot of links with pics are broken & not many have switched from HD to Sport or gave a comment on the difference from experience.
#5
why don't you try to remove the front spring pads and see what it looks like?
It will only go down very slightly, i know, but it will give you a better idea of how much you need to go down by.
i had the opposite issue (front springs were too low) so now have cut OEM springs in front and vogtlands in the back with no pads
It will only go down very slightly, i know, but it will give you a better idea of how much you need to go down by.
i had the opposite issue (front springs were too low) so now have cut OEM springs in front and vogtlands in the back with no pads
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
744 C36 AMG,040 C43 AMG, CLK55 208, CLS55 IWC, CLK500 Rocketbunny widebody
Either go to smaller spring pad front or cut a half coil to a coil off the front spring. chaging the shock wont do anything
#7
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: REHOBOTH BEACH DE
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
88-300CE TWIN TURBO, 99-C43, 05-G55K, 71-280SL, 94-E320 CAB, 08 CLK63 BLACK SERIES
I have Bilstein Hd's with H&R Springs up front with stock pads, but i'm disappointed with the drop. It sits higher in the front than in the back and i'm looking to get it lower.
currrently the gap is about 1.5 -2 inches or 3 fingers. I want it to sit right at the fender like the picture of the white CE.
Would swapping to Bilstein Sport & removing spring pad get a decent drop?
currrently the gap is about 1.5 -2 inches or 3 fingers. I want it to sit right at the fender like the picture of the white CE.
Would swapping to Bilstein Sport & removing spring pad get a decent drop?
The coupe by design has a "natural" rake with the rear always higher then the front.
You slam it too much and your car will not handle
Trending Topics
#8
Prior to the widebody conversion, I had Vogtland springs all round & I loved how the car sat at the front - nice & low with no rubbing issues at all.
When we put the 500e front fenders on we realized that the arch sat lower, so I had to go with a set of sportline springs to even it out...
I think the Vogtland fronts are still up at Mototrwerks - let me know if you are interested.
Here's a couple of older shots:
When we put the 500e front fenders on we realized that the arch sat lower, so I had to go with a set of sportline springs to even it out...
I think the Vogtland fronts are still up at Mototrwerks - let me know if you are interested.
Here's a couple of older shots:
#9
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1988 300CE
The white coupe in the first post is how i would like it to sit.
#10
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1988 300CE
Prior to the widebody conversion, I had Vogtland springs all round & I loved how the car sat at the front - nice & low with no rubbing issues at all.
When we put the 500e front fenders on we realized that the arch sat lower, so I had to go with a set of sportline springs to even it out...
I think the Vogtland fronts are still up at Mototrwerks - let me know if you are interested.
Here's a couple of older shots:
When we put the 500e front fenders on we realized that the arch sat lower, so I had to go with a set of sportline springs to even it out...
I think the Vogtland fronts are still up at Mototrwerks - let me know if you are interested.
Here's a couple of older shots:
Wow, i think thats a perfect drop. If you have those springs i'm interested
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Forethill, Ca Northcal
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
85 euro w124 300d non turbo black on black......coming soon hx35 turbo intercooler
I have heard of many people going without pads at all. or maybe just pads in back? Ive done lots of research just cut your stock springs. I know its a sore subject but I know lots of guys who cut them and love the ride. And its easy to doand you get the ride height you want. Use a small cutting wheel and do it slow dont let it get glowing hot!! And you can get a cheap pare at junk yard.
#13
ascates - check your PM...
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Denver,CO USA
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
"88 300CE- First Year Production
Yes I've done and seen this in person on my 300ce and what about you?
#17
Member
wow thats sits really high....I have Bilstein sport (shorter piston) with 1 bump pad and HR sport springs (1.3F 1.3R spec) and I can barely get one finger under the front fender.....its perfect
#18
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: REHOBOTH BEACH DE
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
88-300CE TWIN TURBO, 99-C43, 05-G55K, 71-280SL, 94-E320 CAB, 08 CLK63 BLACK SERIES
The HD and the Sport bottom at the same point, so when the weight of the car is on them they both compress to the same point.
The valving and internal parts are identical and shared between the HD and Sport with the only difference being the location of the upper internal stop.
The Sport internal stop is set lower which limits the travel by about one inch compared to the HD.
The reason the travel is limited on the sport is so that cars with an extreme lowering spring will not pull the springs off the pad under full extension.
I run HD's with H&R sport springs...why?
Because it is not a track only car and I want a bit more of a compliant handling which will prevent my suspension from slamming against the stops on a harsh road surface.
Don't want to bounce around a curve as I need to put a lot of power to the ground so maintaining control by keeping the tires with as much road contact at all times is imperative.
Too stiff of a suspension with limited travel hampers weight transfer which is an important part of handling !
Last edited by RBYCC; 04-10-2009 at 07:41 AM.
#19
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1988 300CE
Well the specific spec ifor HD uncompressed= 635mm, compressed = 466mm. For the sport its uncompressed = 605mm, compressed = 458mm. Compressed height difference is so smail its negligible. But the uncompressed height has a difference of 30mm = 1.18". The overall stroke difference is 22mm = .87".
So to me it may change the height slightly, as the 2 previous posters have notice dfrom their actual experience of about .50 inches. So it seems understandable that although the shocks don't dictate ride height, it may help slightly in supporting a little weight of the car especially when brand new.
Hopefully the official numbers i posted will help others in their choice.
So to me it may change the height slightly, as the 2 previous posters have notice dfrom their actual experience of about .50 inches. So it seems understandable that although the shocks don't dictate ride height, it may help slightly in supporting a little weight of the car especially when brand new.
Hopefully the official numbers i posted will help others in their choice.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Long Beach, Ca
Posts: 2,849
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
lots of cars
^^ He's right... All springs and shocks will eventually settle with use. Even on Sports and H&R set up expect to go down about .25 more. My fastest way to solve the gap problem is just to buy one size up on the tires. I liked the way it looked on 235/40/18 and 245/40/18 because it had no gap.
#21
Almost a Member!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1988 300CE
The Results
Hey guys well after a lot of thought, I had one coil cut off, & i went to the #1 dot spring pad & achieved the perfect stance and ride quality is unchanged & seems better actually.
But remember these were brand new springs, not old or used ones.
But remember these were brand new springs, not old or used ones.