E-Class (W124) 1984-1995: E 260, E 300, E 320, E 420, E 500 (Includes CE, T, TD models)

Definition by year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-08-2010, 04:48 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ocpanther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OC SoCal
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300E
Definition by year

What are the cut off points for each of the major changes to the w124? Like how far does the m103 engine go before it is replaced by the m104?

The face lift was 94-95 right?

What year was the side cladding added?

Are there any other major differences to watch out for?

I am looking into another Benz and my 89 is the one I know. I like the prefacelift, but know nothing about the m104 so I would like to be able to tell the difference before I go and look at these cars.

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by ocpanther; 03-08-2010 at 04:52 PM.
Old 03-08-2010, 04:58 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Saijin_Naib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,968
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1990 300ce 24v I6
m104 for the Sedan started with the Facelift I believe.
m104 for the Coupe started with 1990 (my car).
Old 03-08-2010, 06:05 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ocpanther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OC SoCal
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300E
So is the m104 a 3.0 L or a 3.2 L standard? There are several references to cars with a 3.2 (Sedan) in years 90 - 95. That doesn't seem right to me, but I wasn't sure if there were different options.
Old 03-08-2010, 06:41 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
2PHAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
500E Signal Rot
Originally Posted by ocpanther
So is the m104 a 3.0 L or a 3.2 L standard? There are several references to cars with a 3.2 (Sedan) in years 90 - 95. That doesn't seem right to me, but I wasn't sure if there were different options.
Let me see if I can clear this up a bit.

Coupe: M104 3.0l CIS motor in the 1990-1992. 1993+ saw the M104 3.2l HFM motor in the coupe.

Sedan: M103 motor from 86-92. 1993+ was the 3.2l M104 HFM (94-95 also)

Side cladding was new for model year 1990, on the W201 it was in 1989.

1992 was the first year for R134a coolant in the AC system.

Rear license plate filler panel added for model year 1991.

Many other updates occuring in model year 1992, although I don't remember them all, one of note is the change in the steering wheel/airbag design.

If it were me, I would consider a 1992+ model only, nothing earlier, given preference to a facelift model (94-95)
Old 03-08-2010, 08:55 PM
  #5  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ocpanther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OC SoCal
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300E
Thank you that is exactly what I was looking for. I didn't know '93 went to a 3.2. that was really messing me up when looking at the ads.

So, now I just need to find the combination with everything i want in the base so then i can go customize from there.
Old 03-16-2010, 01:52 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ocpanther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OC SoCal
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300E
Originally Posted by 2PHAST
Let me see if I can clear this up a bit.

Sedan: 1993+ was the 3.2l M104 HFM (94-95 also)

If it were me, I would consider a 1992+ model only, nothing earlier, given preference to a facelift model (94-95)
I am looking into a 93 300 with I think the 3.2 M104. Do I have to worry about the main wire harness on this year?

Is there anything else of worry that was special to the 93?

Thanks -
Old 03-16-2010, 02:49 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also depends on which particular market we are referring to.
Old 04-11-2010, 06:13 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ocpanther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OC SoCal
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300E
Bump on an older thread ...

I have a new question.

The MY 93 has a 3.2 liter and a 2.8 liter?

Is there any major difference between them? Besides the displacement? I assume they are both the M104 engines ... I came across one today that I am very interested in ... but I don't know if the power difference is major, if I need to worry about anything that is different ?

Please help with any insights.
Old 04-11-2010, 08:33 PM
  #9  
Member
 
deanyel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
400E
Yes, both 104s, 2.8 was 194hp, 3.2 was 217hp. 2.8 was tex standard/leather optional, 3.2 was leather standard, plus a few other standard features.
Old 04-11-2010, 10:03 PM
  #10  
Member
Thread Starter
 
ocpanther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OC SoCal
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1989 300E
Originally Posted by deanyel
Yes, both 104s, 2.8 was 194hp, 3.2 was 217hp. 2.8 was tex standard/leather optional, 3.2 was leather standard, plus a few other standard features.
Thanks. That was an excelent direct answer.
Old 04-13-2010, 01:13 AM
  #11  
Member
 
jrmd01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 E320 CDI
Originally Posted by 2PHAST
1992 was the first year for R134a coolant in the AC system.
Is this true for the coupes too?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Definition by year



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 PM.