94 E500 thoughts?
Over past 15 years I have owned 3 Porche's, 5 BMW's, 3 Merc's as well as several others. My 1992 500E is the only keeper. It has been virtually flawless, (power steering pump & motor mounts) and is still fun to drive.
Over past 15 years I have owned 3 Porche's, 5 BMW's, 3 Merc's as well as several others. My 1992 500E is the only keeper. It has been virtually flawless, (power steering pump & motor mounts) and is still fun to drive.
I wanted to replace my pristine E420 (W124) with a 500E but I just could NOT find a nice one.
I gave up and settled for a CLK55. No doubt a quicker, better handling, better equipped car... but.. it's no 500E.
Someday I have money for a toy/collectible car, I'd have one next to whatever E-class AMG can offer.
i think part of the charm of the 500E is the nostalgia...probably for the same reason why i still have a soft spot for my old porsche 928. i can' remember the name, but i recall when AMG first made a custom 300E w/ a V8 and upgraded suspension/brakes/wheels, it was about $200k USD back in the late 80's/early 90's. so when the 500E came out in 1992 for about $80k, it was almost the same performance for less than 1/2 the price. in addition, the power was very similar to what porsches and ferrari's did in the late 80's.
when i test drove the 500E, it felt like a nice car but unless it was pushed, it probably drove very similar to a 400 or 420E, imho. in fact, i think it started in 2nd gear also. therefore, i'm not surprised to hear comments like that.
btw, i still think it's a great car and will be a classic. who wouldn't mind having a parked in the garage in pristine condition? as a daily driver, however, i think i'm still very happy that i have my 01 E55

The car you are thinking about was the Hammer. and it was on the 300/400 body which is much different than the 500 body.
Having owned and driven both the E55 and my two 500E's I can pretty much assure you that unless you prefer a more "camry like" drive, the 500E is the one to drive as the daily [or cross country] driver.
There is no comparison between the E500E and the E55 AMG other than it's genes. If you prefer the old body style with questionable Porsche heritage (built in the same plant)then the E500 is for you. If you prefer a car that is better equiped, better balanced, and more reliable, get the E55.
The AMG has every feature/option you could want from ventilated seats, sun shade. dimming lights,dual chrome exhaus, etc. The E500E is spartan in comparison.
Each AMG is a very unique and special car, each engine is hand built and tested to perform prior to leaving the factory. The E500E is an ordinary 300E with flares and a very inefficient engine at todays gas prices. The AMG is averaging 21 MPG with 25 more HP. The E500E averaged 15 MPG a 30% decrease in mileage. Lastly the E55 AMG is faster than the E500E.
Just my two cents. I don't want to start a war, I'm just speaking from experience.
And I am not sure how you drive but having owned both, I find the mileage to be just about equal. Now at over 50, with a bunch of years of racing, I know how to run a car hard or light but the 500E is a much tighter car than the E55. It was one of the reasons I dumped the E55 [that plus the many electrical gremlins that the W210 enjoys]. The E55 is a very nice car but it lacks character of a "special". There were only 1504 500E's brought into the US over 4 years. You don't see 20 of them at every meet. That is a good thing.
And as for the dubious Porsche connection, read up. The car had both Porsche design help in suspension and electronics and the car was built on the 959 line. It moved between the Porsche and Benz plant 18 times from start to finish.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Only buy 1992 and early 1993 production cars as those were the ones truely built by Porsche. These cars also have the "closed deck" motor which is much stronger than the open deck version. This is more important if you want to bore the motor out but why not go with the stronger design in the first place.
Porsche built 1992 and early 1993 cars because MB had production capacity issues and need to out source production to Porsche (who had excess capacity). After MB fixed their issues with production capacity, they quietly moved production back over to MB and ended the joint venture aspect of the vehicle.
For a collector, the 1992 cars are the most impressive and valuable even though the 1994 looks more modern. I personally like the older style as it was more "old school MB"
Fantastic car. Will likely always be the best 4 door sports MB made.
what do you think of this 94 E500 w/ 142k miles for $15k?
similar miles E420 for that year clean would be around $7k and have lower prices for repairs/parts...and i just paid less than $20k for a 2001 E55 w/ 87k miles...just curious everyone's thoughts.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/car/243976810.html
p.s. i think those BBS wheels were very "in" during the late 80's and early 90's than today, and i'd prefer the stock AMGs.
Also, including the E 60 AMG a total of 10,479 E500E's were built Vs. only 500 AMG's per year.
Lastly, Is there any "lore" with a Chevy Cavilier because it's built at the same plant as a Corvette or a Ford Focus because it's built at the same plant as the GT40? If anything the E500E is a bit of a poser, because it was built at Porsche in Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen. If you want a Porsche buy a Porsche. There is nothing similar between a 959 and a E500E other than the dirt they drove on. My Summer car is in the garage.
Last edited by fireice; Dec 16, 2006 at 12:16 AM.
Also, including the E 60 AMG a total of 10,479 E500E's were built Vs. only 500 AMG's per year.
Lastly, Is there any "lore" with a Chevy Cavilier because it's built at the same plant as a Corvette or a Ford Focus because it's built at the same plant as the GT40? If anything the E500E is a bit of a poser, because it was built at Porsche in Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen. If you want a Porsche buy a Porsche. There is nothing similar between a 959 and a E500E other than the dirt they drove on. My Summer car is in the garage.
when you tire of the "non-specialness" of your E500, give me a call and I'll take it off your hands!!!
You obviously are so mis-informed on so many fronts that perhaps you shouldn't comment on ANY cars anymore. BTW, 500Es were built in the Rossle Bau (the Witch Kitchen bldg.) at Porsche and thru the limited build contracts with MB and Audi, practically saved Porsche back then.
Show some respect for the last true 100% coach-built car by the ur-Mercedes...that you yourself were foolish enough to shell out 80gs for a new one.
...and then proceeded to give to a 16 year old to total...
I do agree w/ you that if you want a Porsche, buy a Porsche.....nice collection by the way
Last edited by FLYNAVY; Dec 19, 2006 at 02:50 PM.
what do you think of this 94 E500 w/ 142k miles for $15k?
similar miles E420 for that year clean would be around $7k and have lower prices for repairs/parts...and i just paid less than $20k for a 2001 E55 w/ 87k miles...just curious everyone's thoughts.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/car/243976810.html
p.s. i think those BBS wheels were very "in" during the late 80's and early 90's than today, and i'd prefer the stock AMGs.
al unser's green 8k one w/o prices and in new mexico, and another one in CT but he's asking around $35k. not that it's not worth it, but for that price there are many cars i'd rather own that i can drive regularly. after all, it's not like living in SF i can have a 5-car garage and can just keep a spare car inside for show/nice sunny days.
al unser's green 8k one w/o prices and in new mexico, and another one in CT but he's asking around $35k. not that it's not worth it, but for that price there are many cars i'd rather own that i can drive regularly. after all, it's not like living in SF i can have a 5-car garage and can just keep a spare car inside for show/nice sunny days.
BTW I had a '94 500e, the last model year back in the day; it was a great road car and for its time very powerful and fast. Traded it in on '99 E55 when they first came out.
I cant go 5 minutes i bet without seeing an AMG I bet.
Also, including the E 60 AMG a total of 10,479 E500E's were built Vs. only 500 AMG's per year.
Lastly, Is there any "lore" with a Chevy Cavilier because it's built at the same plant as a Corvette or a Ford Focus because it's built at the same plant as the GT40? If anything the E500E is a bit of a poser, because it was built at Porsche in Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen. If you want a Porsche buy a Porsche. There is nothing similar between a 959 and a E500E other than the dirt they drove on. My Summer car is in the garage.
M
Last edited by Germancar1; Dec 20, 2006 at 02:47 AM.




I cant go 5 minutes i bet without seeing an AMG I bet.
I cant go 5 minutes i bet without seeing an AMG I bet.





......