E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

Why are MB vehicles so (too??) expensive? And, no, this is not a "troll" post. (more)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-25-2005, 05:01 PM
  #26  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
HELL ONA HARLEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: THE NAPA VALLEY, CA
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Build date 2-04 E500
Originally Posted by lig
Reality check here:

The fact remains that many of us have not had the same experience.
Guess this is the reason for different attitudes here...
Old 11-25-2005, 05:08 PM
  #27  
lig
Super Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
Originally Posted by HELL ONA HARLEY
Guess this is the reason for different attitudes here...

Agreed. I'm certainly not denying that M-B has made a bunch of trouble free cars. It's just that they happened to make some not-so-troublefree ones and probably made more of them than in the past.
Old 11-25-2005, 05:08 PM
  #28  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nevada Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by lig
Reality check here:

My early '03 E320 was an electrical nightmare. It sounds like the great majority of those problems seem to be worked out by now.

It did suck being a $53,000+ guinea pig though.

My service advisior was very helpful and understanding (and I usually got a C class loaner) but those multiple trips for service shouldn't have been necessary in the first place.

Those of you in denial about M-Bs drop in quality - I am glad you guys in particular have had trouble free cars.

The fact remains that many of us have not had the same experience.

As proof why on earth would M-B make quality improvements their stated goal if there were no problems to begin with? It doesn't make sense.

"Mercedes, Quality Dropping, Loses Market Share to BMW, Lexus
Bloomberg February 8, 2005 Jeremy Van Loon in Frankfurt jvanloon@bloomberg.net.
Dan Stets at dstets@bloomberg.net.
Dominik Wendel got fed up with his Mercedes SLK 350 sports car. First, the convertible roof leaked. Then it wouldn't open properly, sending him back to the garage at least five times. The car also whistled on the autobahn.
“I was not very satisfied with the quality,'' said Wendel, 40, a lawyer with the Frankfurt-based firm Noerr Stiefenhofer Lutz. Last year he bought a Lexus SC 430 from Toyota Motor Corp.
Mercedes has plunged in customer satisfaction surveys in Germany and the U.S., partly because of technical flaws. The world's largest luxury carmaker has lost sales to Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Toyota, and profit is falling. Tomorrow, Mercedes's parent, DaimlerChrysler AG, probably will say fourth- quarter net income more than halved to 634 million euros ($821 million), according to 14 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.
Eckhard Cordes, who took over in October as chief executive officer of Stuttgart, Germany-based Mercedes Car Group, has pledged to reverse the slide. A 29-year DaimlerChrysler veteran, Cordes, 54, says he plans to cut costs to counter the impact of the U.S. dollar's 16 percent decline against the euro in the past two years. Mercedes already negotiated 500 million euros in savings with German workers in 2004. Cordes also says he'll make sure cars produced now meet the company's quality standards.
``Each customer lost is very difficult to win back,'' says Michael Schneider, a fund manager at Frankfurt-based Deka Investment GmbH, which oversees about $144 billion in assets and owns DaimlerChrysler shares. ``It will take time to improve their image.''

Electronic Failures - DaimlerChrysler shares fell 4.7 percent last year, compared with a 15 percent stock gain by Toyota, which is based in central Japan's Aichi prefecture. They closed at 36.16 euros yesterday.
Mercedes-Benz, which makes the S-Class luxury sedan and the A- Class compact hatchback, ranked 29th out of 37 brands in a June reliability study of 3-year-old cars by Westlake Village, California-based J.D. Power & Associates. It logged 327 defects per 100 vehicles, worse than the U.S. industry average. Four years earlier, Mercedes scored seventh out of 38 brands, with 308 defects per 100 vehicles

At home, Mercedes-Benz had the most electronic failures of all brands sold in Germany, Michelstadt, Germany-based automotive consulting firm 3hm Automotive said in July. It was also last among 33 brands in a March study gauging customer satisfaction by the ADAC German Automobile Club. Car owners were most satisfied with Toyota. Munich-based BMW ranked ninth.
Quality deteriorated at Mercedes, known for its star symbol, as DaimlerChrysler focused on reorganizing Chrysler Group in the U.S. and expanding in Asia with its unprofitable affiliate, Mitsubishi Motors Corp., says Michael Raab, an analyst at Sal Oppenheim in Frankfurt."
What is this stuff about denial...more misinterpretation. I and other "true believers" have on many occasions acknowledged the quality control problems and I know I have indicated I felt bad for those who have experienced them. But because I have not does not mean other have been so fortunate. MB has an obligation to fix those vehicles to like new. However, the quality problems in the early 2003 models have been addressed and in the 2004 and 2005 and the 2006 models. All the trashing of MB continues to harp on earlier comments and JD Power reports which I have already provided my comments on.

It is about time people started talking about what MB has done in the past couple of years to oversee a failure in their high standards of quality control. Herr Diesche has indicated in a recent interview that returning MB to their prior status is not "rocket science" but concentration on doing it right the first time. I am convinced he knows where he is going and how he is going to get there.

Again my concern is not about what Lexus has or what Toyota stock is worth. My concerns and the reason I participate in this forum is to talk about MB, have problems solved, get hints on TSB's, etc. Also keep in mind, many people here complain about certain features the Japanese have but MB doesn't...they are usually about seat softness, NAV images, and other minor conveniences or just "why can't MB do that." If you want those features, buy the competition or wait for the MB version.

If I have a problem you will hear about it but it will not change my mind about the car. I will have my SA take care of it and drive on, not cry the sky is falling.
Old 11-25-2005, 05:16 PM
  #29  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benzmodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
W203 slightly modified
Originally Posted by JWS3
OK, guys-- Serious question from an enthusiast and not troll bait. But first, a bit of background...........

4) Anything else to be added? Discuss?
*wishes you to move to Singapore*
Old 11-25-2005, 05:24 PM
  #30  
lig
Super Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
Originally Posted by Nevada Jack

Where do these Chrysler stories start and where the hell are all these electrical problems and MB's falling apart by the 100's.

Perhaps I misunderstood your meaning here, Jack. In reference to electrical problems it sounded to me suspiciously like a river that flows through Egypt.

Last edited by lig; 11-25-2005 at 05:40 PM.
Old 11-25-2005, 05:56 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JWS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
I am sorry, but I do not follow what you are trying to say.

Originally Posted by benzmodz
*wishes you to move to Singapore*
What does this mean, exactly?

Hey, I am not trying to be difficult, but was sufficiently surprised after driving recent and much lower priced makes that I felt the urge to post. My memory of the magnitude of difference was much greater than the unpleasant reality I could not deny after driving, of all things, a SUBARU!!! If anyone is in denial here, it should be me!!
Old 11-25-2005, 06:09 PM
  #32  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nevada Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by lig
Perhaps I misunderstood your meaning here, Jack. In reference to electrical problems it sounded to me suspiciously like a river that flows through Egypt.
I would consider it "de-nile" if these were prevalent today and were not fixed in subsequent model updates. We are still talking about the 2003 which no one has said was a trouble free model.

Took me a minute to figure out your reference...:-)
Old 11-25-2005, 06:19 PM
  #33  
lig
Super Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
If the board is any indication - it does seem that the newer W211s are much better now than my ill fated '03.

Best of luck on that beautiful S Class. I'm so glad you chose that over the R.
Old 11-25-2005, 06:25 PM
  #34  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Nevada Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 5,517
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
2011 E350 Cabriolet..White and Almond Mocha
Originally Posted by lig
If the board is any indication - it does seem that the newer W211s are much better now than my ill fated '03.

Best of luck on that beautiful S Class. I'm so glad you chose that over the R.
Me too...but I am still a fan of the R Class. Just was not right for me at the time the deal came to delivery time.

Hope to see you posting a pic of your new MB sometime soon...:-)
Old 11-25-2005, 06:34 PM
  #35  
lig
Super Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
Never say never. The wifey will be needing a new car in a year or two.

I think she would look hot in an SLK55. She got tired of my *****ing about my E though (kind of like you guys) :p
Old 11-25-2005, 06:44 PM
  #36  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Originally Posted by gsrthomas
Once chrylser bought out MB reliabiliy of the electrical components went down the tube.
Check your CNBC Squakbox Tivo.... MB bough out Chrysler..

And there is NO chrysler engineering at MB.. I will say that Chrysler drained $$ from MB, but there was no parts,technology, or anything sent over from Detroit to Stuttgart.

As for prices..

a 1981 300D cost $35K, and a 2006 E320CDI costs $51K

Adjusting for inflation the new CDI is a bargain compared to the D..

I agree MB has gone backwards from their glory days, but they're still by far the best auto marker that I can afford to buy from!
Old 11-25-2005, 07:50 PM
  #37  
Super Member
 
ruykava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Earth
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mercedes all the way!
realised i'm repeating what i've said in other threads, but....
my 2003 E-class is the most reliable car i've ever bought. period. better than the W124 220E i had for the previous 13 years (skipped the W210). ok, so the W124 did more than 200k miles, but still, when it was about 5 years old it started to act up badly - stalling on intersections, very rough gearshifts, meters failing everywhere, rattling. and it is nothing as luxurious as the W211. this experience is similar to most others i know personally, too - none of my friends ever had problems on their W211(besides trying to navigate COMAND for the first time, lol).

so i think lots of ppl here are looking at old times a little too romantically. then again, the W124 WAS hugely better than anything else on the market at the time of its introduction...

as someone mentioned above, other cars are rapidly getting better and better. you can hardly find a "bad" car nowadays, if at all! i'm eagerly waiting to get my sweaty palms on a W221 to see if THAT will really blow the competition away. after all i've driven the W220, 7-series, and A8 now. time to see what Merc can really do when they try doubly hard...
Old 11-25-2005, 07:53 PM
  #38  
rjm
Senior Member
 
rjm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Multiple
Originally Posted by CE750
Check your CNBC Squakbox Tivo.... MB bough out Chrysler..

And there is NO chrysler engineering at MB.. I will say that Chrysler drained $$ from MB, but there was no parts,technology, or anything sent over from Detroit to Stuttgart.

Better rewind the tape on your VCR and check again. It was a MARKETING MERGER....nobody bought anybody:

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/americas/9...hrysler.merger/
http://www.roadfly.com/magazine/11/m..._problems.html
http://www.theautochannel.com/news/p...ess012154.html



You are now seeing Mercedes suspensions and parts in Chrysler products (witness the 300C advertising), and judging from the current quality of Mercedes cars, there are no doubt Chrysler parts and technology (cost-cutting by using cheaper parts and electronics) in Mercedes products. They are also sharing markets.......more Chryslers sold in Europe, and hopefully more MB sold in the U.S.
Old 11-25-2005, 08:08 PM
  #39  
IllCDI
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hyundai? Subaru? show me a rear wheel drive car that has a diesel motor thats sold in the states? there is no comparison.. I admit though if other manufacturers came out with a RWD Diesel Car I probably would have looked elsewhere. Only reason I chose this car was cause of the diesel motor.
Old 11-25-2005, 08:47 PM
  #40  
Super Member
 
guitarplayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio/Florida
Posts: 517
Received 123 Likes on 67 Posts
2023 GLC 300 4MATIC
My 98 Accord which I gave to my son, while very very reliable, now rides like a truck. My friends 1987 260E still rides like new. Perhaps this is a difference.
Old 11-25-2005, 09:03 PM
  #41  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benzmodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
W203 slightly modified
Originally Posted by JWS3
What does this mean, exactly?

Hey, I am not trying to be difficult, but was sufficiently surprised after driving recent and much lower priced makes that I felt the urge to post. My memory of the magnitude of difference was much greater than the unpleasant reality I could not deny after driving, of all things, a SUBARU!!! If anyone is in denial here, it should be me!!
If you lived in Singapore you would be lucky to own a car. Certainly there would be about 100x less ownership than there is in the USA in the 20-35 demographic. What I paid for my C180 would have bought me a C320 USA with money left over for Sunman mods maybe even a C32.

Australians generally look at posts like this and think that your next $5000 invest should be on travel outside the USA so that when you get home you will have the overwhelming urge to kiss the tarmac at the airport when you get out of the plane. You have it easy and these apparent differences you refer to are so incredibly small that it doesnt even raise an eyebrow here.
Old 11-25-2005, 09:15 PM
  #42  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Originally Posted by rjm
Better rewind the tape on your VCR and check again. It was a MARKETING MERGER....nobody bought anybody:

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/americas/9...hrysler.merger/
http://www.roadfly.com/magazine/11/m..._problems.html
http://www.theautochannel.com/news/p...ess012154.html



You are now seeing Mercedes suspensions and parts in Chrysler products (witness the 300C advertising), and judging from the current quality of Mercedes cars, there are no doubt Chrysler parts and technology (cost-cutting by using cheaper parts and electronics) in Mercedes products. They are also sharing markets.......more Chryslers sold in Europe, and hopefully more MB sold in the U.S.

IT was called and masked as a "merger" for political reasons.. the Capital Transaction was "Diamler" buy "Chrysler" thus the leadership structure today.. All German.
Old 11-25-2005, 10:07 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
JWS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500
Sounds like you guys are the victims of an oppressive government (more)

Originally Posted by benzmodz
If you lived in Singapore you would be lucky to own a car. Certainly there would be about 100x less ownership than there is in the USA in the 20-35 demographic. What I paid for my C180 would have bought me a C320 USA with money left over for Sunman mods maybe even a C32.

Australians generally look at posts like this and think that your next $5000 invest should be on travel outside the USA so that when you get home you will have the overwhelming urge to kiss the tarmac at the airport when you get out of the plane. You have it easy and these apparent differences you refer to are so incredibly small that it doesnt even raise an eyebrow here.
Are you really taxed that heavily? If yes, why havn't you thrown the government out on its collective butt?
You are right- we Americans do have it good. We value our freedom and have fought many a war to keep it. I personally would never stand for the complete socialist bullsh*t you describe. Any government that would inflict such utter garbage on its citizens needs to be cleaned out and fast. There are a few reasons the US is the last remaining superpower and personal freedom is fairly high on the list. We are hardly a perfect society, but one thing is for sure--a heavily taxed people seldom prospers.
Old 11-26-2005, 03:18 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
marcos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ML 320 CDI
My E just had its 3rd birthday and has hit 50,000 miles. Not many miles for an MB but it rides and looks as new. Everyone who gets in is amazed by the ride quality etc. Now show me a japanese car that after 3yrs still looks and feels this good. They age badly in the fact that the interiors are boring to start off with, the styling is boring to start off with and after 3yrs the whole damn car looks like a 1970's styling nightmare.
Old 11-26-2005, 04:59 AM
  #45  
lig
Super Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
After 3 years - my S2000 still looks good (at least to me) and after 13 years our Lexus still runs beautifully and the leather is still very supple.

My S2000 has seen numerous track days and is the 2004 & 2005 WWSCC Auto-X Championship winning car in Improved A. It's three years old (and the design debuted in MY2000) and IMO it still looks great.

Come to think of it 76,000 of your fellow Brits just voted the S2000 the #1 car in the Top Gear poll for the 2nd time.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/survey/top_10.shtml
Attached Thumbnails Why are MB vehicles so (too??) expensive? And, no, this is not a "troll" post. (more)-index-1.jpeg  

Last edited by lig; 11-26-2005 at 05:02 AM.
Old 11-26-2005, 08:15 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
marcos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ML 320 CDI
Originally Posted by lig
After 3 years - my S2000 still looks good (at least to me) and after 13 years our Lexus still runs beautifully and the leather is still very supple.

My S2000 has seen numerous track days and is the 2004 & 2005 WWSCC Auto-X Championship winning car in Improved A. It's three years old (and the design debuted in MY2000) and IMO it still looks great.

Come to think of it 76,000 of your fellow Brits just voted the S2000 the #1 car in the Top Gear poll for the 2nd time.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/survey/top_10.shtml
I have to agree with you on the S2000, it's kept it's youthfull looks and is agreat design. However most Japanese cars age very badly in the styling department, lexus cars always look like a dated design 6 months after coming out, they have absolutely no style I'm afraid.

With regard to the S2000 coming top in the Top Gear poll, it's a joke, no one with a brain ever votes on this crap so it's fairly pointless really. I don't mean to offend you dude as I like the S2000 but the poll is utter rubbish.
Old 11-26-2005, 12:11 PM
  #47  
lig
Super Member
 
lig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was '03 E320 - now - '04 S4
Originally Posted by marcos

With regard to the S2000 coming top in the Top Gear poll, it's a joke, no one with a brain ever votes on this crap so it's fairly pointless really. I don't mean to offend you dude as I like the S2000 but the poll is utter rubbish.
No offense taken. I had no idea the poll was a sham. I love the S2000 regardless. It seems that Clarkson likes it too.

As far as Lexus design goes... I think the only one that really looked good was the 1st Gen. SC400/300. For a fifteen year old design it has held up really nicely IMO. There really isn't another Lexus model that really struck me as being a paragon of style.

I do like the new IS though.

As far as other Japanese designs that I think have been successful...

I like the last generation RX-7. I think the 1990 era 300ZXs held up well. The current Inifinti G35 coupe is a very handsome car IMO as well.

Last edited by lig; 11-26-2005 at 12:20 PM.
Old 11-26-2005, 08:12 PM
  #48  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Originally Posted by lig
I like the last generation RX-7. I think the 1990 era 300ZXs held up well. The current Inifinti G35 coupe is a very handsome car IMO as well.
Japanese do very well when they don't try to copy the Germans... they're good at making cars, as the Z can attest.. but they are no got at making German substitutes IMHO.
Old 11-27-2005, 02:37 AM
  #49  
Super Member
 
sprink49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 788
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
2004 S500
OK... I'll stick mine in this for a bit. I am a Mechanical Engineer and am familiar with structural isuues such as dynamic torsional and tensile strength as well as torsional geometric force. Over time, these forces are acting upon all parts and systems in an automobile. The failure of automobiles with inferior design and engineering in these areas will inevetably fail prematurely.

At the end of the day only MB, BMW, Audi, Volvo and a few of the Bentlys and VW products excell in these engineering areas. Go to a salvage yard and look at cars that have been in total loss accidents and look at the "bones" of the cars. Toyotas/Lexus and Nissan/Infinity don't have the fundamental engineering that the German cars do.

The German cars have structural superiority in these areas of engineering that don't allow these aforementioned forces to act upon them as readily or have as much long term negative effect as others do.

Believe me...we get what we pay for in a better all around piece of equipment.

Drive a Honda Accord or Lexus/Toyota whatever for a week then get back in your E Class or S Class...then you will know.
Old 11-27-2005, 06:56 AM
  #50  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
benzmodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
W203 slightly modified
Originally Posted by JWS3
Are you really taxed that heavily? If yes, why havn't you thrown the government out on its collective butt?
You are right- we Americans do have it good. We value our freedom and have fought many a war to keep it. I personally would never stand for the complete socialist bullsh*t you describe. Any government that would inflict such utter garbage on its citizens needs to be cleaned out and fast. There are a few reasons the US is the last remaining superpower and personal freedom is fairly high on the list. We are hardly a perfect society, but one thing is for sure--a heavily taxed people seldom prospers.
It seems we can get into Canada much more easily than we can into the USA. I will have to settle for Banff or something like that.

We have a country that is bigger than the USA has 10x less people and is 20,000 miles further from Germany than you are. The problem is with inefficient staffing and useless corporate policy. We get to pay so much for cars because there are too many tiers in pricing.

As a stunt, I tried to apply for work as a technical advisor in Mercedes Benz Australia. The woman that spoke to me on the phone had no idea what I was talking about, didnt ask me one relevant question and wasnt the least bit interested in telling me who the technical #1 was or what the minimum requirements are for being considered.

Ok so if experience, knowledge and passion cant get you a job in Mercedes Australia then exactly what incentive is there to improve the pricing ? The more they charge the more of these "talented" scouts they can hire. I told one of my mentors who is a respected engineer and he couldnt speak for about 15 seconds.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.

Quick Reply: Why are MB vehicles so (too??) expensive? And, no, this is not a "troll" post. (more)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 PM.