E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

E550 or CLS550, Pros and Cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-31-2006, 04:18 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
jdr1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E550 or CLS550, Pros and Cons

I am about to take the plunge into any of these two and thought of starting a discussion on pros and cons for these choices.

My head is spinning to fast to make any choice today so lets have a debate while I calm down.

For me the Pro for the CLS550 is that it is basically a new model and I am planning to have the car for 10 years more or less. The Con is the backseat space but I can not rememeber when someone sat in the rear seat of my car for the past 2 years.

E550 is more spacious but the new models will come in the next 3 years so value will go down and in 10 years parts will be harder to look for (the last one is just speculation)

Engines are the same, 7G Trans on both (same problems or wonders).

Prices CLS is about 9-10 % more than the E probably a little more.

What are your thoughts.

J
Old 05-31-2006, 04:58 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jagata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S6 LP640 E500
If you have the means than get the cls, the e (what I have) just looks dated next to the Cls.
Old 05-31-2006, 05:03 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kar don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GMT -8 hours
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
E is getting a facelift and will look great imo.
Old 05-31-2006, 05:07 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
JimPurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
11 ML350W2 / 17 GLC300
The glass area of the CLS is smaller and makes me feel like I am looking out through a tunnel. I wouldn't trade even my 2000 wagon for a new CLS let alone my 2003 E320 sedan.
Old 05-31-2006, 05:22 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Double Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E-500
I don't like the CLS because of poor side and rear visibility and the rather low driver seat position. I would not enjoy driving this car on a long trip; however, would be OK for most of my city driving.

I'd definitely prefer the E550 over the CLS but will wait until the "brand new" E-550 comes out in 09 before I'd buy it at this time.

The CLS probably has more close up curb appeal than the S; however, that is not what sells me on a car. I'm sure you'd probably enjoy either one as they are both quite nice, but many subtle differences.
Old 05-31-2006, 05:47 PM
  #6  
Member
 
ajm0824's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E320
Thats a tough one....

me thinks pros/cons on differences

CLS PROS
---------
Newer Styling
less likely for near-term major change

CLS CONS
-----------
poor side and rear visibility
poor driver seat conditions
don't like the back (IMHO)
more expensive
not exactly proven (may not be around anymore to compare in 10 years)


E PROS
-----------
beautiful regardless of design date
proven.
more spacious and wide viewing areas
less expensive


E CONS
-----------
Will be dated style in 09 (not even sure I would wait and get an 09/first year either)


If milage allows, it sounds to me like you'd be best to find a good lease deal on either and then decide to buy it off in 3 years (slight premium but imo worth it) or get a next generation E
Old 05-31-2006, 05:53 PM
  #7  
Out Of Control!!
 
konigstiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 15,903
Received 4,415 Likes on 3,145 Posts
'71 Pinto
But it’s all right now, I learned my lesson well. You see, you can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself!
The following users liked this post:
vich3 (02-13-2023)
Old 05-31-2006, 06:33 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Parts for a E-Class especially a regular one like the E550 will never be hard to find, that is crazy. The E is as mass produced as some really cheaper cars. If you're going to keep either car for 10 years they'll both suffer the same fate regarding the next generation models. The CLS may be "new", but it won't have the normal 7 year cycle either. The CLS is marketed as a Coupe and Mercedes coupes like the CLK only have about a 5 year lifespan. I'd say that they'll be a new E for the 2010 model year and a CLS would likely follow in 18 months after that. The CLS isn't going to 2013 (normal 7 year cycle) without a total re-design.

M
Old 05-31-2006, 07:35 PM
  #9  
Member
 
jameson75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles / Orange County
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 E500 / 1993 MR2 Turbo
Originally Posted by jta00r1
If you have the means than get the cls, the e (what I have) just looks dated next to the Cls.

I would have disagree. I believe the E class (w211) has a classic look to it that will never look "dated". The cls, although a beautiful car, has a unique shape...true, but its not a classic design. Its too dramatic or for lack of a better word drastic. The novelty will wear out really fast.
Old 05-31-2006, 07:40 PM
  #10  
ON PROBATION
 
ClayJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E is roomier and has better visibility -- I looked at the CLS...and then bought an E.
Old 05-31-2006, 07:41 PM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jagata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S6 LP640 E500
I'm sure the same topic on the cls section will get differant answers than this section.
Old 05-31-2006, 07:57 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
jdr1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will post on the CLS forum and see what happens.

Thks

J
Old 05-31-2006, 08:00 PM
  #13  
DWP
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
DWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'08 AM Vantage V8 - '03 E500
If you compare the two cars using Consumer Reports criteria, the E is the clear winner. It costs less, has the same underpinnings as the CLS and doesn't have the compromises with practicality (visibility, rear-seat space, etc.) dictated by the styling of the CLS. Thing is, paying $70,000 or $80,000 for a car isn't particularly rational in the first place. It's not like you're trying to decide between an Accord and a Camry; emotion is at least as important as comparing the specs of the two cars on edmunds.com. Like the man said, decide which one suits your personal style better and buy it.
Old 05-31-2006, 08:07 PM
  #14  
Out Of Control!!
 
55fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 14,212
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
00 MB ML55, 91 Toyota Supra Turbo(sold), 06 E500(gone), 03 BMW M3
how old are you? while you want to keep the car for the next 10 years make sure you keep in mind EVERYTHING that will happen in the next 10 years... children or possibly grand children? Wife?

I know friends who in there mid 20s never carried passengers in there rear of there cars for many years... but if they were to get married or some that were married were to have kids, your going to need back seats... CLS would not work out unless your and your family are a small asian family(no disrespect to asians)
Old 05-31-2006, 09:01 PM
  #15  
Super Member
 
sklasse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my opinion,

the CLS is a more refined version of an already very refined Base ( the w211)...
, I saw this one dude drive up to our local stores parking store with his CLS55 with its roaring AMG engine..,

the entire parking lot just stared at it, with mouths ape.

after that, I AM definetly PRO CLS

Last edited by sklasse; 05-31-2006 at 11:14 PM.
Old 06-01-2006, 07:53 AM
  #16  
Newbie
 
durbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Germancar1
The CLS may be "new", but it won't have the normal 7 year cycle either. The CLS is marketed as a Coupe and Mercedes coupes like the CLK only have about a 5 year lifespan. I'd say that they'll be a new E for the 2010 model year and a CLS would likely follow in 18 months after that. The CLS isn't going to 2013 (normal 7 year cycle) without a total re-design.

M
Urrr...where are you getting this dodgy-*** info from?

The current CL class has been on sale since 1999. And the new one will be a 2007 model at earliest. I'm not mathematician, but 2007 minus 1999 doesn't equal 5 to me.

The previous CL class (W140) was sold from 1991-1999. And the one before that (W126) from 1972-1991.

The 1st gen SLK was sold from 1997-2004.

The current SL has been around since 2001, with only a recent facelift.

It's only the previous generation CLK that seems to have had a shortened life-span.

I can't think of any other Mercedes coupes, so how are you able to make a generalisation that 'all Mercedes coupes have a lifespan of around 5 years'?

And don't bother using the years on the forum main page as a guide - we're talking actual physical years in which the cars were produced, not dodgy year models which Mercedes decides to introduce at variable times.

Last edited by durbrain; 06-01-2006 at 07:59 AM.
Old 06-01-2006, 10:35 AM
  #17  
Member
 
edspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs, USA
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic, 2012 Kia Soul+
I was in the same boat and chose the E. Like many posters to this thread, the CLS looks better, but it feels odd behind the wheel. It felt cramped to me and the back seat was a cruel joke. But if you feel comfortable driving and sitting in the CLS, buy it. I would not worry about parts, only the sheet metal is different. The engine and electronics are the same as the E.
Old 06-01-2006, 10:56 AM
  #18  
ATS
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
ATS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E500 / 2001 C240
The exterior of the CLS is great and interior of the E is great. I care more about the inside of my car then the outside really. So the E would be my pick.

With the CLS, some colors do not look good - I like black, white and silver. Some of the other colors do not look good on that car for some reason.. (IMO).
Old 06-01-2006, 12:28 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 289 Likes on 202 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by durbrain
Urrr...where are you getting this dodgy-*** info from?

The current CL class has been on sale since 1999. And the new one will be a 2007 model at earliest. I'm not mathematician, but 2007 minus 1999 doesn't equal 5 to me.

The previous CL class (W140) was sold from 1991-1999. And the one before that (W126) from 1972-1991.

The 1st gen SLK was sold from 1997-2004.

The current SL has been around since 2001, with only a recent facelift.

It's only the previous generation CLK that seems to have had a shortened life-span.

I can't think of any other Mercedes coupes, so how are you able to make a generalisation that 'all Mercedes coupes have a lifespan of around 5 years'?

And don't bother using the years on the forum main page as a guide - we're talking actual physical years in which the cars were produced, not dodgy year models which Mercedes decides to introduce at variable times.

Dodgy *** info?? Looks like someone needs to find a timeout room. The CLS is based on the E-Class and it will be replaced soon after the E thats common sense. Mercedes isn't going to continue building the CLS on an old platform for long after the E is replaced, that was my point. Sorry if you didn't grasp that. You're right about the CL, but SLK and SL are roadsters not "coupes" in the traditional sense. Common sense also says a car as highly styled as the CLS isn't going to be "in" for 7 years either. Its a different car for Mercedes, IMO.

Lastly if you had read the post slowly you would have seen where I stated "I'd say" as in what I think will happen, not fact.

M

Last edited by Germancar1; 06-01-2006 at 12:30 PM.
Old 06-01-2006, 06:36 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Brav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
07 M6, 05 Noble, 01 S4, Smart ForTwo
Personally, the CLS is kindof a gimmick. Not a legitimate car. Trendy styling which will get old just like the VW beatle. Doesnt even really have any MB traditional styling. Back seat might as well be a Porsche. The E if spec'd right is a much nicer looking car. The interior is nicer as well as you actually get wood on the door. CLS is more of a look-at-me car while the E has utility. I considered the CLS, but once the novelty wore off, the rediculous back seat, poor visibility, lack of headroom, japanese headlights really got to me. Get a new E.
Old 06-01-2006, 09:57 PM
  #21  
Super Member
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Warren, NJ
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 E320 CDI;'04 S2k;'94 Supra TT;'10 QX56;'38 Buick;98 Port City Offset Late Model
You have to think of the CLS as a 2-door. My biggest issue with it is the limited rear seat room. If getting it, I would only get it with Parktronic. Then, I would only get any MB with Parktronic.
Old 06-02-2006, 12:32 AM
  #22  
Almost a Member!
 
BzzzBom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E-500, 2005 Mini Cooper S
IMO the CLS is the "Pimp my Ride" of the Mercedes models. It will look dated soon. Stick with the classic - buy the E550
Old 06-05-2006, 04:57 PM
  #23  
Member
Thread Starter
 
jdr1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its an E

After hours of discusion with my concience (AKA Wife), I (as in my wife) decided for an E550.

Thank you all for your time and opinions.

It is a great car and we were comparing two beautifull machines.

What decided at the end was comfort, I am a big guy and I felt a little claustrophobic inside the CLS.

Thanks again

J
Old 06-05-2006, 05:07 PM
  #24  
Member
 
edspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago Suburbs, USA
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2014 E350 4Matic, 2012 Kia Soul+
You (aka Wife) made the right choice. Both of you will be very pleased.
Old 06-05-2006, 06:52 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Double Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Clemente, CA
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 E-500
Hope you have many pleasant miles in your new E-550, and glad the comments from this forum were helpful to you in making your decision.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: E550 or CLS550, Pros and Cons



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 PM.