E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

210 vs 211

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-27-2007, 01:04 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
AcftEngr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
210 vs 211

I have learned a lot about the W210 Airbag system. Had a recent accident with a W210....see link ( https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w210/189570-crash-w-o-airbag.html ). Looking for previous W210 owners that have gone to the W211.

Considering replacing my 210 with a 211 but will be limited by funds. Is one larger than the other on the interior? The rear seat looks smaller (width). What actual fuel mileage? Are the early W211 plagued with reliability problems? Would a late 210 be better than a 211? I have some info from the 210 forum but wanted all angles!!
Old 04-27-2007, 01:28 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Barry45RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
2015 ML 350
The later the better with the 211's.

I've found over the years, that when I get the same model car again, even if it is a different color, it doesn't feel like a "new car" and that I'm "missing something" of the thrill even though I have the new car payments. Whenever possible I think its better to get something different.
Old 04-27-2007, 04:32 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Clinton Horn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2003 E320
I may not be qualified to comment on the 210 but I think the truth needs to be told on the 211. This body has less rear legroom than many comparable size cars. I have another (Japanese) mid size car that is so close in overall length that it is a dead heat when they are side by side. I can tell you without any hesitation that the 211 is not even close in rear leg room. I love the 211 and I do not often complain about it's faults but if you ever spend any time in the back seat, you better pray the front seat occupants are under 5'-10". I would give up some trunk space for another 1-1/2 to 2" of legroom. I disagree about the 1/2". I guarantee your knees can tell the difference. The trunk is Sopranos size.
Old 04-27-2007, 11:22 PM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Untertürkheim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The W211 is definately adequate with rear legroom, and feels larger because of the improved cabin ergonomics. I would just buy one starmarked and extend the warranty to cover everything until the car reached 100k. Then, anytime you have a problem you can simply slip into a loaner and not pay for a thing.
Old 04-27-2007, 11:51 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Originally Posted by AcftEngr
I have learned a lot about the W210 Airbag system. Had a recent accident with a W210....see link ( https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=189570 ). Looking for previous W210 owners that have gone to the W211.

Considering replacing my 210 with a 211 but will be limited by funds. Is one larger than the other on the interior? The rear seat looks smaller (width). What actual fuel mileage? Are the early W211 plagued with reliability problems? Would a late 210 be better than a 211? I have some info from the 210 forum but wanted all angles!!
AcftEngr,

Sorry to hear of your accident, glad everyone is OK.
You may not remember me but, I helped you on the A/C questions.
I currently own a W210 and W211 in my case to compare the two is impossible as the W211 is a E55 and so far from a normal car it is unreal.

So I'll use a 210 point of view. The rear leg room is a little bigger, fuel tank is larger, trunk is smaller, gas mileage (430 engine) 20 city W/AC 26.5@72mph W/AC. All 210s are out of original warranty, Headlights illuminate the road better. Bose sound is better, Mono blade wiper is superior, (Florida rain)

It is too bad that in todays world, newer may not mean better. Seems newer is more complicated and more dealer dependent. what ever you do get a warranty.
Old 04-28-2007, 12:20 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lkchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 6,081
Received 209 Likes on 186 Posts
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550
If you can find a diesel W211, you won't like anything about W210s!
Old 04-28-2007, 12:25 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
you're safe with any W211 built in late 2004 or newer with all the recalls done on it.. especially the SBC.. I've got a late build 2005 Diesel and it's been 100% flawless in all respects.
Old 04-30-2007, 08:58 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Mr.Gearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta suburbs
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 Aspen, 1970 Corvette, 2000 Corvette and 2009 Legacy Limited
Having been an original owner of a 2002 E320 SE and just stepping into a 2006 E350 new last year. There are big differences.

W210:
Solid car and feels like a Mercedes should. Good shoulder and head room. (I'm 5'11 @ 190lbs). Rear seats are comfortable and provide ample leg room. A little loose in the turns and lacks a little horsepower for it's size. Stock suspension feels as the marque states it should, luxury not sport. Unless of course your car comes with the AMG badge or Sport attached...

W211:
Feels more like a high end Camry than an evolution of the tried and true W210. Cabin seems a bit tighter and rear seems to have less head room. Body style looks more sleek and has a boy racer look. The engine does get a noticeable bump in the E350 base and it can be felt when loud pedal kisses the floor. The brakes are probably going to be the biggest complaint. The SBC is by far the biggest thorn in the W211's side. You will need to drive it to understand the abrupt braking experience. Suspension is tighter than previous base model and handles well, especially with plus sizing. When I first drove, it was great but after a mere 8 months I find myself looking for a replacement already. After 4 years in the W210, I was still loving the car...


In my opinion, the W211 feels like a reinvention of the w210 instead of expansion on a great car for the money. I miss my E320 SE, its almost square body, heavy doors and solid Mercedes feel. When I see the W210 body style I think class and old world Mercedes. When I see the new W211, I think... I really need to get out of my 06 and find a clean W210. Maybe I can find mine and maybe there will only be 29,000 miles still showing....
Old 04-30-2007, 10:06 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Barry45RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
2015 ML 350
Dads 2001 E320 210: Old. Old. Old. Nothing to differentiate it from an '84 era S Class except that the steering wheel is not as large as a covered wagon's wheel. All about form following function, a hedious sound system. Front seats that are sprung like an interstate bus's. Underpowered and noisy. No Style at all (in the fashion sense, but it IS a Mercedes so it has stature or class). 3 box design. Was held over too long, like an aging film star no longer getting parts.

211- Had an '04 w/ SBC Brakes. Never minded them. Drove them like I would any other car. A good idea ahead of the manufacturers ability to bring it to market. 320 still underpowered, so I bought a 500. Nice! The 350 engine took care of the underpower problem in the car, though. HK7 is a great sounding Audio system... not what an Audio Snob would call fabulous, but for a car? Excellent. Blows away the 210's system so that anyone could hear the difference. I personally had far too many problems with every item in the '04. Its gone. My '07 E550 is perfect. This car is amazing. Style, Looks, Features...

You want a safe and plain girl next door? A 210 is what you want. Wanna date a Model? A 211.
Old 04-30-2007, 10:57 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CE750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
My only complaint on the W211 vs the W210 is the seats... I think MB skimped on some of the interior trim, especially the seats and cheapish headrests.
Old 05-02-2007, 01:49 PM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
AcftEngr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all your comments. I look for a while and see what I can find within my budget.

Yacht Master,
Thanks for the A/C help. The day before the trip I put in a can of freon....it worked great on the left and right vent!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 210 vs 211



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 AM.