E-Class (W211) 2003-2009

Is the paint and body better than other cars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-09-2008, 02:35 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Nickelmania-Dal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the paint and body better than other cars?

It seems that, in the old days, a purchaser of a Cadillac could be assured of having better paint on their cars. Maybe it even had a lacquer finish or extra coats of lacquer. My question: Is the paint and body work on an MB any better than a new Buick? Everyone always speaks about MBs interiors being much better than American or Japan cars but what about the exteriors. I dont notice much difference in the quality. They all seem to have plastic grills. Is the MB plastic grills better? Dont get me wrong I love my MB. Just curious on thoughts from the board.
Nickel
Old 08-09-2008, 03:03 PM
  #2  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Musikmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2001 E320 RWD - Brilliant Silver/Ash: 100,000+
The paint job on your MB, even though applied by robots, is about as good as it gets. So is the new ceramiclear clear coat developed from nanotechnology. I know nothing about the plastic grills or body panels, but I suspect those are first rate too.

Last edited by Musikmann; 08-09-2008 at 03:04 PM. Reason: addition
Old 08-09-2008, 03:20 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Diesel Benz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 6,378
Received 295 Likes on 247 Posts
223.168 & 213.012 & 906.633 & 214.005
I guess it is as good as it can be with the environmental standards MB follows. If they were not using water soluble stuff etc. it could of course be even stronger. I'm not sure if some other manufacturers make a different compromise here.
Old 08-09-2008, 03:45 PM
  #4  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
I gotta say, although the Nano looks fabulous, I think it's weak and fragile. My S500 with the older paint seemed thicker, with this nano stuff everytime I accidentally rub the car to strong I get freaked because I thought I scratched it, it just seems thinner.
Old 08-09-2008, 04:39 PM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
451/443=EW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
C350 4Matic
Do a search and you will find post about the paint on MB.
I personaly cant remember much but I can tell you based on what iv learnt here on MB. The paint is a harder base and does not scrach as easliy on MB.
So the finish looks better longer. The down side of harder paint is it may chip faster.

Soft paint scratches faster but harder paint chips easier. I dont believe there is technology at least cheap enough to fix both problems.

like I said do a search and yo cna find threads on this topic.
Old 08-09-2008, 04:55 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Barry45RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale Area, USA
Posts: 5,017
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
2015 ML 350
Didin't somebody point out some time ago that the sheet metal on an MB is thicker due to some German standard?

The rock solid feel of our cars doesn't come from tightening the nuts & bolts any harder than everybody else. It has to come from each component NOT being made to the thinnest and lightest dimensions possible to meet the minimum standards necessary. If it could be done with lesser weight materials and still achieve the rock solidness, wouldn't every manufacturer reverse engineer the MB to achieve similar feel with lesser quality materials?

So the answer is: An MB is built of better materials, with extra reinforcing materials/dimensions thruout.
Old 08-09-2008, 07:10 PM
  #7  
Out Of Control!!
 
55fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 14,212
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
00 MB ML55, 91 Toyota Supra Turbo(sold), 06 E500(gone), 03 BMW M3
Paint is by far the easiest to answer... MB nano technology paint is the best... It is almost a ceramic paint, its VERY hard and can take amazing abuse... my E was in an accident where the whole right side of my car was replaced and painted... the paint was in PERFECT shape even on the destroyed panels... the paint bonds to the metal on a molecular level and will not chip or peel like other manufacturers.

Body work... MB uses more metal, more welds(vs bolting stuff together) and if something needs to be somewhat removable, instead of bolting, they are rivited in place...

These cars are very solid...
Old 08-09-2008, 07:30 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Polar Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,691
Received 139 Likes on 94 Posts
W221 S600, W220 S55 AMG Kompressor, W124 300E, W140 S320, W210 E3204M W164 ML320 Bluetec
Only comment I can make is my W210 E55 had MANY MANY more paint chips than my 2005 W211. I am not sure if the paint technology is different, but there sure is a difference in the number of chips on the front and hood.
Old 08-09-2008, 07:51 PM
  #9  
Member
 
EclassFetish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
e class
benzo's definitely do seem to have higher quality paint and thicker metal.

this is evident when trying to "roll your fenders" for clearance issues with lowered cars.

this I'd give props to benz.
Old 08-10-2008, 10:27 AM
  #10  
Out Of Control!!
 
55fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 14,212
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
00 MB ML55, 91 Toyota Supra Turbo(sold), 06 E500(gone), 03 BMW M3
new paint for E's came with the 211
Old 08-10-2008, 11:18 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
 
enr1co's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Northern CA, SF East Bay
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E320
Originally Posted by EclassFetish
benzo's definitely do seem to have higher quality paint and thicker metal.
Not knowledgeable on paint quality but appearance wise mbz paint looks thicker and deeper than comparable japanese cars in their class.

As far as sheet metal, it is definitely thicker on mbz,bmw, vw, mini owned.

The high quality of Japanese makes speak for themselves but the thin
sheet metal used factors into the buying decision for myself. I once gently leaned a door on a honda owned and it produced a ding/impression. In showrooms, I'll put pressure on parts of body panels and doors and you can literally feel the metal pushing in like a soda can.
Old 08-10-2008, 06:06 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Nickelmania-Dal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by enr1co
Not knowledgeable on paint quality but appearance wise mbz paint looks thicker and deeper than comparable japanese cars in their class.

As far as sheet metal, it is definitely thicker on mbz,bmw, vw, mini owned.

The high quality of Japanese makes speak for themselves but the thin
sheet metal used factors into the buying decision for myself. I once gently leaned a door on a honda owned and it produced a ding/impression. In showrooms, I'll put pressure on parts of body panels and doors and you can literally feel the metal pushing in like a soda can.
Is funny you should mention metal thickness. I once had an Audi A6 and Ford Expedtion sitting in front of my house during a hail storm. The damage on the Audi A6 was around 4K the Expedtion was over 6K. The Expedtion looked horrible with deep hail dents. The Audi damage was so light that I didnt even repair it. I guess that answers my question in regards to German cars exteriors. I had forgotton about this nasty hail storm fro a few years ago.
Old 08-10-2008, 06:26 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
dreamcatchr23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 W211
My other household car is an Infiniti, and I can tell you firsthand that the difference is night and day... The difference is particularly noticeable when doing any type of paint correction for swirls/scratches (i.e compounding, polishing)... Even my previous 5-series BMW didnt have paint of MB's quality...
Old 08-10-2008, 06:37 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
sosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Philadelphia area
Posts: 4,260
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2010 ML550, 2010 E350 4M, 1966 Corvette Convt C2
As far as the body goes the steel is better and a higher tensile strength than most manufacturers use, The fit and finish is excellent and quite durable. The engineering is the big difference as it is I believe the vehicle is much more resistant to personal injury in an accident.
Old 08-11-2008, 04:27 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lkchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 6,069
Received 205 Likes on 182 Posts
'07 GL320CDI, '10 CL550
Spent about 15 minutes in a severe hailstorm on I-40 in our W124/300E which started with us doing 75 and maybe then slowing to 55.

Never found a dent but sure expected the worst.
Old 08-17-2008, 04:52 PM
  #16  
Super Member
 
aceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
E500 4matic, 2014 GL320, 2013 C300, 2015 Stingray
All i can tell you...

After 63K of relatively trouble free miles, the nose/hood of my E is full of chips. some are quite large. Frankly, it may look "deeper" but i'm not a believer in the "nano" hype. I turn cars over quite often, and this car has been the most chip prone car i've ever owned (and i am **** about staying clear of trucks). It could be the geometry of the hood as well, but some of the chips that came off my car are large. Maybe the nano makes it look better for longer, but i don't think it does a darn thing to prevent or reduce chipping - At least in my experience.

Just my opinion!

Aceman
Old 08-17-2008, 06:43 PM
  #17  
Super Member
 
BRABUS_E500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 E500 with 'some' BRABUS upgrades
I left my car at a friends house last year in November while I was out of town on vacation. He had parked it in his driveway but next to a sprinkler head a gardener had later broken. My car got sprayed every night for 31 days straight and got rained on for about 8-9 days collectively AAAND was under a tree the whole time. The days there wasn't any rain it was of course nice and sunny with the rays beating down on my paint and sealing in those water spots.

I got back my car was hooooorrible. Tree sap every where hard hard hard water spots. My detailer went to work on the car that weekend (this point 34 days of weather) and 4 hours later it didn't even look like anything had happen.

My detailer is a middle aged gentlemen that details only high end cars (Ferrari's, Lambo's, BMW's, MB's etc etc) I hired him through a friend that used him for about 5 years and he has been doing my car(s) now for the last 3. So I trust what he does and his opinion very much.

I was shocked that he got all that out because I seriously thought I might have to get the car re clear coated or something major. He said to me: "No matter what the weather and how long the cars been out in it as long as its a semi-newer model Mercedes I never have a problem tackling those jobs."

He went on talking about how MB paint and their process and paint quality is of the highest if not the highest he has seen in his detailing career. Very tough and easy to work with I love MB
Old 08-18-2008, 12:14 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
SPNJHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Exit 16E
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
07 E350 4Matic / Sport with P1
Originally Posted by aceman
After 63K of relatively trouble free miles, the nose/hood of my E is full of chips. some are quite large. ...I turn cars over quite often, and this car has been the most chip prone car i've ever owned (and i am **** about staying clear of trucks). It could be the geometry of the hood as well, but some of the chips that came off my car are large. Maybe the nano makes it look better for longer, but i don't think it does a darn thing to prevent or reduce chipping - At least in my experience.
Just my opinion!
Aceman
I'm with you on this one. Detailed this weekend, and my front is a mess...including the grill. Looks like it was sandblasted. Have never had a car look like this after 14 months!
Old 08-18-2008, 09:41 AM
  #19  
Super Member
 
LaicepsYdobon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Essex County, NJ
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2011 E350 Sport 4Matic - P2 & Drivers Assist / 2010 C300 Sport 4Matic - P2 / 2013 Porsche Cayenne S
Originally Posted by dreamcatchr23
My other household car is an Infiniti, and I can tell you firsthand that the difference is night and day... The difference is particularly noticeable when doing any type of paint correction for swirls/scratches (i.e compounding, polishing)... Even my previous 5-series BMW didnt have paint of MB's quality...
BMW uses what is called 'soft paint' on their cars while MB and Audi uses 'hard paint'. Soft paint is cheaper to put onto cars but as a result it is more susceptible to chipping, flaking and scratches. The hard paint is more durable to weather and normal abuse. The new C-Class took the hard paint idea further by mixing in microscopic particles of ceramics into the paint to make it even more scratch resistant. Rumor has it that the new E-Class will have this kind of paint also. If you hop on over to E90 Post there is a whole discussion about the poor quality of the BMW paint and more and more of their cars have the 'Orange Peel' effect that's their annoying owners.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Is the paint and body better than other cars?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 PM.