Dyno'd my car today...
04-20-2009, 12:43 AM
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Dyno'd my car today...
My car is bone stock minus AMG mufflers... best run was:
235.6hp @ 4846rpm
297.80tq @ 3067rpm
I had some issues at first completely forgetting about putting the car in dyno mode. Once I got it figured out it was 3 runs on the Dynapack. Horsepower seems a tad bit low and torque seems 20 lbs too high.
All in all a good day and nice to meet some fellow Vancouver MBZ enthusiasts
I'll post my graph tomorrow at work (no scanner at home)
Has anyone dyno'd with a Dynapack? If so, how do they compare with Mustang/Dynojet?
235.6hp @ 4846rpm
297.80tq @ 3067rpm
I had some issues at first completely forgetting about putting the car in dyno mode. Once I got it figured out it was 3 runs on the Dynapack. Horsepower seems a tad bit low and torque seems 20 lbs too high.
All in all a good day and nice to meet some fellow Vancouver MBZ enthusiasts
I'll post my graph tomorrow at work (no scanner at home)
Has anyone dyno'd with a Dynapack? If so, how do they compare with Mustang/Dynojet?
Last edited by 155; 04-20-2009 at 01:03 AM.
04-20-2009, 08:20 AM
#2
MBWorld Fanatic!
my W211 E350 4Matic did 191 whp w/ a cat-back exhaust I'd love to get it up to your stock 500 hp that'd be great, not that far off either. Good work thanks for the info.
04-20-2009, 08:24 AM
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
14 Posts
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
My car is bone stock minus AMG mufflers... best run was:
235.6hp @ 4846rpm
297.80tq @ 3067rpm
I had some issues at first completely forgetting about putting the car in dyno mode. Once I got it figured out it was 3 runs on the Dynapack. Horsepower seems a tad bit low and torque seems 20 lbs too high.
All in all a good day and nice to meet some fellow Vancouver MBZ enthusiasts
I'll post my graph tomorrow at work (no scanner at home)
Has anyone dyno'd with a Dynapack? If so, how do they compare with Mustang/Dynojet?
235.6hp @ 4846rpm
297.80tq @ 3067rpm
I had some issues at first completely forgetting about putting the car in dyno mode. Once I got it figured out it was 3 runs on the Dynapack. Horsepower seems a tad bit low and torque seems 20 lbs too high.
All in all a good day and nice to meet some fellow Vancouver MBZ enthusiasts
I'll post my graph tomorrow at work (no scanner at home)
Has anyone dyno'd with a Dynapack? If so, how do they compare with Mustang/Dynojet?
Numbers do seem off. Did you dyno in 5th gear? That's the final drive gear on our 7sp cars. Also, area these SAE corrected numbers?
**EDIT**
Forgot you had the 2003 with a 5speed. What gear did you dyno in?
04-20-2009, 12:46 PM
#4
Super Member
Thread Starter
They dynoed in 4th...
I'm not sure if it's SAE corrected numbers but i'll try to find out. To be honest I was a little skeptical of the Dynapack which requires the removal of the rear wheels. This isn't your typical drive on, strap down and run it setup.
Does my graph look normal?
**EDIT**
Actually I wonder if 277-278 tq is the right number? According to factory specs we achieve 339 crank torque at 2700 RPM...
I'm not sure if it's SAE corrected numbers but i'll try to find out. To be honest I was a little skeptical of the Dynapack which requires the removal of the rear wheels. This isn't your typical drive on, strap down and run it setup.
Does my graph look normal?
**EDIT**
Actually I wonder if 277-278 tq is the right number? According to factory specs we achieve 339 crank torque at 2700 RPM...
Last edited by 155; 04-20-2009 at 12:52 PM.
04-20-2009, 02:09 PM
#5
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
a car
04-20-2009, 04:55 PM
#7
Super Member
Thread Starter
LOL I was say not so nice. Jikjak dynoed at 455 +/- HP at the wheels with his CLS55 that same day. It became pretty obvious that i should stick with all show no go ;-)
Trending Topics
04-20-2009, 08:47 PM
#8
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8,137
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
14 Posts
Eurocharged 2004 E500, Eurocharged ECU/TCU 2005 SL600, 2010 Caddy SwaggerWagon
Yeah, I get the same inferiority complex when I go to dyno days and track events. I try to make myself feel better by telling everyone that I have the the quickest N/A E500 in the country. That is, until someone proves me wrong.
04-21-2009, 04:34 AM
#11
Out Of Control!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
That does seem like major drivetrain loss in the HP area. IMO it would make sense to get those numbers if your car was a 4-Matic? 
Also those torque numbers do seem abnormally high. Some Dyno's just work differently than others and show different results.
Has anyone Dynoe'd a non 4-Matic E350? A 268 HP car should be dynoing at over 225 HP to the wheels.
Also those torque numbers do seem abnormally high. Some Dyno's just work differently than others and show different results.
Has anyone Dynoe'd a non 4-Matic E350? A 268 HP car should be dynoing at over 225 HP to the wheels.
