Consumer Reports......
If I was an average consumer watching that segment with the E320 hitting the cones during emergency manuevers, I would have thought there were problems with the handling and would have been scared off purchasing the W211.
Here is the link: http://abclocal.go.com/wls/news/spec...luxurycar.html
These are the same ones that put that huge outrigger on a small SUV and then marveled at how it rolled over! I saw the preview for the segment but forgot to watch. Good thing, guess.
Bruce
Nevertheless, they are good for their other reviews, and for the reliability data (to a point, of course).
Assuming MB has addressed the major reliability problems for the 2004 model year and beyond, the next survey should show an improvement (I'm keeping my fingers crossed,) But MB is going to have to live with its black eye until new survey data is available.
The CU roundup did not compare all 13 models head-to-head. The only models newly tested for this review was the E320, BMW 530i, Jaguar S-Type, and Volvo S80. The E320 came out best among these four. All of the other cars in the
roundup was tested previously.
I love my 04 E320: look, ride, gadget, and the overall feeling. I would recommend it to anyone, but I would lie to myself if I state that the car is reliable. I've owned it for 30 days, out of which the car spent 18 days at the dealer (they have to replace the entire ECU & gateway module).
I know that mine is a rare case, but I've meet quite a few people at dealer who complain about the same: Benz is not as reliable as it used to be.
Most current Benz owners are also owners of previous models, and when they compare its reliability, it's against the older model, and that explains the drop.
Old Benz (E300, 420/560SEL) built like a tank, and run til, ....well, forever .....
The June issue of Consumer Reports (Magazine and Website) rated the E320 as part of a 13 vehicle luxury sedan roundup. CU basically liked the E320 -- it came ranked 4th overall, behind the Lexus LS430, MB S430, and Acura TL, -- but the E-class reliability was a show-stopper. CU's philosophy is that a car must have at least average reliability and acceptable crash-worthiness, in addition to whatever merits it possesses, for CU to recommend it. CU could not recommend the E320 because of the 2003 E-class's dismal reliability performance in CU's annual member survey.
Assuming MB has addressed the major reliability problems for the 2004 model year and beyond, the next survey should show an improvement (I'm keeping my fingers crossed,) But MB is going to have to live with its black eye until new survey data is available.
The CU roundup did not compare all 13 models head-to-head. The only models newly tested for this review was the E320, BMW 530i, Jaguar S-Type, and Volvo S80. The E320 came out best among these four. All of the other cars in the
roundup was tested previously.



