Dealer says 2012 E550 will NOT have new turbo engine...
and he seemed pretty confident about his information.
Anyone else hear this?
Aceman

"Anyway, on with the good news. The new V8 is a direct-injected twin-turbo unit of 4663 cc displacement. According to Mercedes, the engine, which will appear first in the CL-Class coupe and S-Class sedan this fall, will pump out a healthy 435 hp and 516 pound-feet of torque, up 12 percent and 32 percent respectively. Thanks to the direct injection system, Mercedes can run the engine at 10.5:1 compression ratio."
550 4matic that gets between 25-30 mpg on hwy!
Aceman
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Last edited by RJC; Feb 1, 2011 at 11:01 PM.
As i said, i hope you guys are right!
Aceman
As i said, i hope you guys are right!
Aceman
http://www2.mercedes-benz.co.uk/cont...?isflipfocus=1
http://www2.mercedes-benz.co.uk/cont...?isflipfocus=1
http://www2.mercedes-benz.co.uk/cont...ical_data.html
I'm not looking to start a arguement here - we all know the engine is out, all i am saying is i was told its coming out into the CLS & S first (2012), followed by the E stateside in 2013.
Lets all hope my info is incorrect.
Aceman
http://www2.mercedes-benz.co.uk/cont...ical_data.html
The current M273 V8 has a stellar reputation and there really isn't that much difference in fuel economy. Some of the estimated fuel savings come from the start/stop feature and some from changes to the ancillaries. The numbers for the new CL with the M278 engine are 15 and 22, that's no better than the current E550 which is lighter but has better numbers too.
In general, will we really notice a 1-2 mpg gain in money savings and environmentally, what's the point increasing mpg on low volume/high-end cars, especially like creating a Ferrari hybrid? How will 300 extra hybrid cars in the world decrease our reliance on fossil fuels. How about low cost hybrid or smaller/lighter full-size pick-up trucks (have you seen the size of a new F-150 compared to one 25 years ago?) and leave the exotics alone.
My wanting the turbo was from what i've read on its fuel consumption. I've seen various reports as low as 10% and as high as 20% (and a couple in between).
My wanting the newer engine is primarily for the added power (i've driven the 5er with the turbo 8, power is available very early in the torque curve primarily due to turbos). The fuel savings is an added benefit - i drive a lot, 25000 miles per year. If (when) gas goes to 4-5.00/gallon, something tells me i will appreciate having a car giving me 25-27 hwy vs. the 19-20 i'm currently getting as it will help offset some of the increase in cost. Also big plus for me is added range to a tank of gas.
I would be all over the diesel w/ the huge torque but no 4matic so that's out.
I've looked at Audi A8 as well - i do want something bigger but at the end of the day I still like my E and figured this would be worth waiting for.
Aceman
From what I'd been able to discover, the current 5.5 liter V8 is one of the smoothest running engines on the planet and it's bullet proof.
I had planned to buy a 2012 but I don't know when I can order one, how much it will cost, what V8 engine will be available and if there are going to be problems with things like the new oil pump, new alternator, new fuel pump and other new technology. There is also the concern that the engine must have low sulfur fuel. I buy name brand fuel but I don't know if I'm going to get fuel from a South American source. The current M273 won't have a problem with bad fuel.
I can get a 2011 E550 at least three months earlier than a 2012 and I'll be able to get more for my '08 E350 because it will still be under warranty.



